Showing posts with label Holder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Holder. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

VIDEO: Everybody Was Colluding With The Russians Except Trump: Mark Steyn on Fox


VIDEO: The Uranium One Scandal: At Least $145 Million In Kickbacks: Peter Schweizer on Fox




Democrats' Russia Narrative Is Spiraling Out of Control

dailycaller


Democrat politicians and pundits are quickly losing control of the story surrounding Russian influence efforts within the United States.

The Washington Post reported Tuesday that Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias hired Fusion GPS on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee. New York Times reporter Ken Vogel said Tuesday that Elias had “vigorously” denied being involved with the dossier, which is said to have relied upon Russian sources. Another NYT reporter, Maggie Haberman, similarly indicated that Democrats had repeatedly lied to reporters about their involvement with the dossier.

Prominent Democrats are now scrambling to distance themselves from the revelations. The DNC released a carefully-worded statement meant to distance current party leader from the dossier. The “new leadership” of the DNC, the statement said, was not involved with the dossier. Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who resigned as DNC chair last year amidst allegations that the DNC favored Clinton over Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, has denied that she knew about the DNC’s involvement with the dossier.

The DNC and Clinton campaign previously faced ethical questions about their campaign activities when it was revealed that then-DNC vice chair Donna Brazile repeatedly fed Clinton debate questions in order to give her a leg up over Sanders in the Democratic primary. Brazile abused her position as a CNN contributor by acquiring challenging debate questions ahead of time and then passing the questions along to the Clinton campaign.

Former Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon, who is now a CNN contributor, said on Wednesday that Hillary Clinton “may” have known about the campaign’s involvement with opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which paid British ex-spy Michael Steele to craft the dossier. Steele reportedly relied on foreign sources, including some in Russia, to craft the dossier.

The dossier is only one part of Democrats’ Russia problem.

On Tuesday morning, two House chairmen announced a probe into new reports about Russian efforts to influence the Uranium One nuclear purchase, which gave Russia control of roughly 20 percent of America’s uranium.

The Republican chairmen of two House committees announced Tuesday that they’re launching a probe into the Uranium One deal and the Obama-era Department of Justice’s investigation of the deal.

When Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state, Russia routed millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation, and Bill Clinton collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in Russian speaking fees as part of Russian efforts to influence the U.S. government to approve the deal, reports The Hill.

The Obama-era Department of Justice soft-pedaled their original probe into the Uranium One deal, according to that same report. The FBI was also aware of Russian intelligence efforts meant to influence Hillary’s decisions as secretary of state, according to another report.

On Tuesday night, Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley called on the Department of Justice to appoint a special counsel to investigate the Uranium One deal. (RELATED: Grassley Calls For Special Counsel In Uranium One Deal)

The Trump campaign still has uncomfortable questions to answer in regard to Russian influence operations during the 2016 election.

New reporting Wednesday morning revealed that the head of Cambridge Analytica, a data-analytics firm used by the Trump campaign, reached out to WikiLeaks to ask about Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 missing emails. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange reportedly rebuffed the request for collaboration. The president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., has faced scrutiny over a meeting he took with a Russian lawyer, who claimed to have damaging information on Clinton from the Kremlin. The discussions reportedly stopped short of actual collusion and the meeting is said to have been fruitless for the Trump campaign.

To date, the public still has seen no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, even though prominent Democrats have used the unproven accusations to attack Trump and call for his impeachment. Democrats may now have to answer their uncomfortable questions of their own about Russian influence operations.

The special counsel overseeing the Russia investigation, Robert Mueller, is reportedly probing the Podesta Group, a Democratic lobbying firm co-founded by Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. Tony Podesta, John’s brother, is reported to be in the “crosshairs” of Mueller’s investigation into Russian influence operations in the United States.

Mueller is examining whether Russia used Tony Podesta and Paul Manafort, who briefly served as Trump’s campaign manager, were part of Russia’s attempts to exert influence over the Obama administration, one source told Fox News host Tucker Carlson.

Russian influence operations on social media, new reporting shows, promoted divisive political messaging in favor of causes on both sides of the aisle. Left-wing movements like Black Lives Matter and the Standing Rock protests were amplified by Russian operatives as part of a general campaign meant to encourage political division within the United States. (RELATED: America Is Obsessed With Identity Politics — So Russia Exploited It)

 
Tags: Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Russia Scandal, Trump Dossier, Uranium One


Thank You Mr Hasson and DC.



Emails: Obama DOJ Sought To Route 'Slush Fund' Cash To Orgs of Their Choosing

freebeacon
Joe Schoffstall
October 24, 2017 5:25 pm

Emails also show effort to exclude conservative causes

Former President Obama's Department of Justice sought to route settlement money to organizations of their "choosing" while seeking to exclude conservative groups, documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show.

The practice in question began in August 2014 when the Justice Department entered into a $17-billion settlement with Bank of America for selling residential mortgage-backed securities leading up to the 2008 financial collapse. Similar arrangements were made with J.P Morgan Chase and Citigroup that brought the total amount to $36.65 billion.

The DOJ settlement program has come under fire by a number of critics who refer to it as a "slush fund" that allows money to be funneled to third-party activist groups.

In some cases during settlement, the companies agreed to pay financial penalties that consisted of "donations" to nonprofits instead of giving the money directly to the Treasury. The Bank of America and Citigroup settlement included a provision that required $150 million in donations to groups that help people who have been harmed by corporate actions, with the donations counting for twice as much as money that is paid towards the settlement total.

Approved nonprofits included groups such as UnidosUS (formerly the National Council of La Raza), NeighborWorks America, and the National Urban League, which gives grants to left-leaning community organizing groups.

The documents obtained by the Free Beacon show that individuals in the Justice Department sought to route money to allied groups while excluding conservative groups.

"I'm sorry to be a pest. We keep tinkering with the settlement agreement and I want to make sure we are doing it right," Elizabeth Taylor, then the principal deputy associate attorney general, wrote in a November 6, 2013 email. "Can you explain to Tony the best way to allocate some money to an organization of our choosing?" she later added, referring to Associate Attorney General Tony West. (Emails are below)

Another message from a redacted email address shows that West's group had made it a point to make sure conservative groups are not a part of the process:

Got it. Ok, this will hopefully address the concerns we'd like to avert:

Donations to state-based Interest on Lawyers' Trust Account (IOLTA) organizations (or other statewide bar-association affiliated intermediaries) that provide funds to legal aid organizations, to be used for foreclosure prevention legal assistance and community development legal assistance.

Concerns include: a.) not allowing Citi to pick a statewide intermediary like the Pacific Legal Foundation (does conservative property-rights free legal services) or a statewide pro bono entity (will conflict out of most meaningful legal aid) we are more likely to get the right result from a state bar association affiliated entity; b.) making sure that it's legal assistance provided, not a scenario where the bank can direct IOLTA or other intermediary to give to even a legal aid organization but to do only housing counseling, for example, under the umbrella "foreclosure prevention assistance." This get you closer?

(Emphasis added.) 



Ed; use the link to view embedded scribd content.

Documents Show Obama DOJ's ‘Slush Fund' Sought to Route Money To Organizations of Their ‘Choosing' by Joe Schoffstall on Scribd

Leaders from outside groups also spoke to Peter Kadzik, the former assistant attorney general for legislative affairs, in March 2014 to push for making donations "mandatory in all future settlements," the documents show.

Months later, the Justice Department announced the bank settlements would include mandatory donations to community groups. This would additionally offer enhanced credit for the donations.

Additional emails showed some of the organizations showering praise on West for his efforts.

"I would be willing to build a statue [of West] and then we could bow down to this statue each day after we get out $200,000+," wrote one activist.

Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R., Va.), who has expressed concern for some time now over these actions, spoke on the House floor Tuesday on the issue.

The DOJ did not immediately return a request for comment regarding the documents. 


This entry was posted in Politics and tagged Democratic Donors, Justice Department, Obama Administration. Bookmark the permalink. 



Thank You Mr Schoffstall and FreeBeacon.


And here's Jack Crowe's report at the dailycaller.


With Guess Who, again, right smack in the middle of this stink, right under the banner?



Wednesday, March 1, 2017

GOP Wants To Eliminate Shadowy DOJ Slush Fund Bankrolling Leftist Groups




Further proof that the Obama regime used taxpayer funds to politicize government agencies and used those agencies against the American people.

Via Fox News:

The Obama administration funneled billions of dollars to activist organizations through a Department of Justice slush fund scheme, according to congressional investigators.

“It’s clear partisan politics played a role in the illicit actions that were made,” Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, told Fox News. “The DOJ is the last place this should have occurred.”

Findings spearheaded by the House Judiciary Committee point to a process shrouded in secrecy whereby monies were distributed to a labyrinth of nonprofit organizations involved with grass-roots activism.

“Advocates for big government and progressive power are using the Justice Department to extort money from corporations,” Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton told Fox News. “It’s a shakedown. It’s corrupt, pure and simple.”

There is a recent effort by Republicans to eliminate the practice, which many believe was widely abused during the Obama administration.

When big banks are sued by the government for discrimination or mortgage abuse, they can settle the cases by donating to third-party non-victims. The settlements do not specify how these third-party groups could use the windfall.

So far, investigators have accounted for $3 billion paid to “non-victim entities.”

Critics say banks are incentivized to donate the funds to non-profits rather than giving it to consumers.

“The underlying problem with the slush funds is we don’t know exactly where the money is going,” Ted Franks, director of The Competitive Enterprise Institute Center for Class Action Fairness, told Fox News. “Using enforcement authority to go after corporate defendants, DOJ bureaucrats are taking billions away from taxpayers to fund their pet projects overriding congressional preferences.”

Keep reading…

Thank You Fox and Huck Funn

Friday, January 13, 2017

Not So Fast! California Republican Says Hiring Holder To Fight Trump Violates State Constitution

weaselzippers


Update to this story. 

It also violates common sense that the Democratic California legislature would hire an outside law firm at $25,000 per month when the Democratic California AG has almost 1,600 lawyers on staff. But hey… we’re talking about Cronyfornia.

Via Washington Times:
A California GOP lawmaker is challenging the hiring of former U.S. Attorney Eric Holder to fight the Trump administration, saying it may violate the California Constitution.
Assemblyman Kevin Kiley has asked the California Attorney General’s office to investigate whether legislative Democrats ran afoul of the law by retaining Mr. Holder and his law firm, Covington & Burling, for $25,000 per month to do a job that can be performed by state employees.
Mr. Holder was hired last week by the California legislature, which is controlled by Democrats, as outside counsel to provide advice on “our efforts to resist any attempts to roll back the progress California has made” on issues such as climate change to immigration.
But Mr. Kiley cited a court ruling that said the state Constitution forbids hiring outside consultants for roles that can be carried out “adequately and competently’ by those in the civil service, including work “defending California against federal actions.”
“In light of these facts, I respectfully ask your legal opinion as to whether the 1,592 attorneys and legal staff at the State Attorney General’s Office can perform ‘adequately and competently’ the legal services for which Covington & Burling has been retained by the Legislature,” said the Republican Kiley in his letter.
Assembly Republican Leader Chad Mayes said he supports the inquiry, calling it “certainly appropriate to request a legal opinion as to whether this contract is consistent with state law.”

Keep reading…

Thank You Wash Times and Huck Funn.

Wednesday, January 4, 2017

California Taps Former U.S. AG Eric "Fast and Furious" Holder To Resist Incoming President Trump

LA Times




Bracing for an adversarial relationship with President-elect Donald Trump, the California Legislature has selected former U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. to serve as outside counsel to advise the state’s legal strategy against the incoming administration.

The unusual arrangement will give Holder, leading a team of attorneys from the firm Covington & Burling, a broad portfolio covering potential conflicts between California and the federal government.

“He will be our lead litigator, and he will have a legal team of expert lawyers on the issues of climate change, women and civil rights, the environment, immigration, voting rights — to name just a few,” Senate leader Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) said in an interview.

Such a task typically falls to the state attorney general. On Tuesday, Gov. Jerry Brown formally nominated Democratic Rep. Xavier Becerra to replace former Atty. Gen. Kamala Harris, who now serves in the U.S. Senate. Becerra, whose nomination hearings in the Legislature begin next week, is expected to be easily confirmed.

Read More


Thank You Ms Mason and LA Times.

Ca. needs a legal Titan like Holder to replace the Legal Titan it sent to DC, State AG and former SF City Attorney Kamala Harris, to fill Sen. Barbara Boxer's shoes.

One of our personal faves:

Meet California's Other Senator: Barbara Boxer Race Baiting A Black Witness

see also:

California Judges

Fast and Furious 

California: the Regime that just decriminalized Child Prostitution.

Failing The Children of California 


And with this newest feather in his cap, Where will Holder find the time to get Democrats back in control by Gerrymandering the entire country? 

Obama, Holder to Lead Post Trump Redistricting Campaign

Monday, November 21, 2016

SOROS& Democracy Alliance Billionaires Headed For Your Local Community

frontpagemag
How Democrat mega-donors plan to retake power for the Left.


November 18, 2016

John Perazzo

While Hollywood celebrities, professional athletes, tenured professors, and fainthearted college students nationwide continue to react to Donald Trump's presidential election with anger, bewilderment, bouts of weeping, and illiterate tweets, the core leaders of the political Left are already busy planning how they will seek to deligitimize and destroy Trump's presidency before it even gets off the ground. 


The first major effort in that direction occurred this week in Washington’s luxurious Mandarin Oriental Hotel, where a group of super-wealthy leftist funders known as the Democracy Alliance sponsored a three-day, closed-door meeting attended by the multi-billionaire George Soros, the leaders of many left-wing activist groups and labor unions, and Congressional luminaries like Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Warren, and Keith Ellison. Over the past decade, the Democracy Alliance has given at least $500 million to pro-Democrat and leftist causes. High on the list of priorities at its Washington conference was a discussion of how to derail Trump's “100-day plan,” which the Alliance characterizes as “a terrifying assault on President Obama’s achievements — and our progressive vision for an equitable and just nation.” 


In a recent email to his allies and donors, Democracy Alliance president Gara LaMarche offered a clear indication of where the Democrats plan to direct their attention and resources over the next few years. Specifically, he said that this week's conference would focus on assessing “what steps we will take together to … take back power, beginning in the states in 2017 and 2018.” Raj Goyle, a Democratic activist who is also involved with the Democracy Alliance, concurred that “progressive donors and organizations need to immediately correct the lack of investment in state and local strategies.” 


Let that sink in: State and local … State and local … State and local.
This strategy of focusing on state and local politics dovetails seamlessly with the monumentally significant, recent announcement that former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder will be chairing the newly formed National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC), which was developed in close consultation with the Obama White House. NDRC's mission will be to: (a) help Democrats take control of the political offices that decide how state legislative and congressional districts are configured, and (b) configure them in a way that will maximize Democratic power in the U.S. House of Representatives as well as in statehouses across the country. 


In almost every U.S. state, the state legislature determines precisely where the boundary lines for each congressional and state legislative district should be situated, and the resulting maps are then either approved or vetoed by the governor. This process occurs every ten years, after the U.S. Census has been taken. Obviously, a political party has a great advantage if, at that juncture in time, it has control of a state legislature, a governorship, or both. Republicans currently control 68 out of 99 state legislative chambers, and 31 out of 50 governorships. 


To address this imbalance, NDRC aims to promote the election of Democrats as state lawmakers and governors by means of highly aggressive get-out-the-vote efforts, advertising campaigns, ballot initiatives, and legal challenges to state redistricting maps. The overriding goal is to ensure that those Democrats will be in office when it is time to draw up and approve new district maps after the 2020 Census. And to help the Democrats draw those maps in a manner that favors their party, NDRC will carefully analyze the demographic makeup of every neighborhood, every street, and every city block, in order to ascertain precisely how many Democrats and Republicans, respectively, reside in each proposed district. In states where Democrats are in political control, they will be able — with the aid of the demographic data supplied by NDRC — to tweak and bend the boundary lines of their districts however they wish, so as to create as many majority-Democrat districts as possible. 


Of course, to accomplish all this, NDRC will need lots of money. And that's where the Democracy Alliance and George Soros come in. They've got billions of dollars at their disposal. And they can give as much as they want to NDRC, because the organization is incorporated as a tax-exempt “Section 527 Committee” — a term referring to the section of the IRS tax code that governs such entities. As Open Secrets.org explains: “These groups are typically … organized for the purpose of influencing an issue, policy, appointment or election … [and] can raise unlimited funds from individuals, corporations or labor unions, but they must register with the IRS and disclose their contributions and expenditures.” 


Unlimited funds. George Soros. Democracy Alliance. Corporate and union donors. A multi-partner marriage of political radicals, made in heaven. And the presence of Democrat patron saints like Eric Holder and Barack Obama — the latter of whom has already stated that the advancement of NDRC's agenda will become the main focus of his own post-presidential activities — will undoubtedly help to convince many leftist millionaires and billionaires that it is worth their while to dump the contents of their wallets into the project. 


The Democratic Party may be in turmoil for the moment, but its leaders and funders have never been more driven to increase their political power than they are right now.


Thank You Mr Perrazo and FPM.




Wonderful/S. The guy who brought us Fast and Furious is going to be working at gerrymandering/gaming the votes as his party wails about the unfairness of the Electoral College.

Thursday, September 8, 2016

Morale At DOJ Hits Rock Bottom

daily caller
Richard Lawless



Over one year ago I filed a report with the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s office regarding the on-going theft of tens of billions of dollars in the municipal bond market.

After a full year has passed, no action has been taken and the criminal activity continues.

Over this time period I have had the honor of talking with dozens of FBI field agents and they have made it clear that they have no confidence in their leadership. Using their colorful language, the field agents made it clear to me that nothing will come of my complaint because of the widespread political corruption infecting the entire Department of Justice.

I was told more than once that the rank and file officers feel that the Director of the FBI and many of the Assistant Directors are likely to “drop their pants and bend over their desks when the Attorney General or the President calls. They feel this is done in some sad, misguided attempt to preserve or enhance their positions. One field agent actual suggested the Director and his Assistants begin wearing skirts to work to save time the next time their phone rings.”

Pretty powerful and descriptive off the record feedback!

What was more disturbing to me was the conviction of the agents that in many cases it made no sense to proceed with a criminal investigation, even if the agent felt they could build a good case. The agents suggested that after all their hard work is done, the investigative findings are sent to the U.S. Attorney’s Office where it will go through a political screening to first determine if the administration will allow this specific prosecution.

If this is in fact true, it leaves the American people without any legal recourse in many cases.

I can only speak from my experience and I have been told no one will allow my complaint to be honestly prosecuted. To date, that FBI agent seems to be right.

Mr. Lawless is a career Banker and CEO of Commercial Solar Power, Inc. Mr. Lawless has been working with the SEC, the FBI, The U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Treasury Department to uncover the reasons for Puerto Rico’s $70-billion-dollar bond default.




Tags: Department of Justice, FBI, Richard Lawless


"Over one year ago I filed a report with the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s office regarding the on-going theft of tens of billions of dollars in the municipal bond market.

After a full year has passed, no action has been taken and the criminal activity continues."


Mr Lawless, are you familiar with that old time keeping adage about Hell Freezing Over?

Over a year? A Whole Year? Check the dates of our postings.

Monday, July 18, 2016

Darrell Issa & The 100% Redacted Pages: Sir, You Should Be Ashamed Of Yourself



Too bad we can't get Issa instead of Trump.


This is your Dept of Justice, in 2011.


And you wonder how Mass Murder by Pharma doesn't even rate a blip on America's radar screen.

Thursday, April 14, 2016

Oversight Chairman Discusses Fast And Furious 'Executive Privilege' Documents Pried Out Of Obama

townhall

Katie Pavlich
|
Posted: Apr 14, 2016 1:10 PM


Last week President Obama finally turned over thousands of Fast and Furious documents to the House Oversight Committee after his 2012 executive privilege claim protecting Attorney General Eric Holder was struck down by a federal judge. As a refresher: 
Just moments before Attorney General Eric Holder was voted in contempt of Congress by Republicans and Democrats in June 2012 , President Obama asserted executive privilege over thousands of documents related to Operation Fast and Furious. Holder was held in contempt for stonewalling and failing to turn over the documents to the House Oversight Committee. Obama granted the executive privilege request despite claiming to have no knowledge about Operation Fast and Furious when it was active from 2009-2010.
Now, some details about the documents are beginning to emerge, showing the Department of Justice only partially responded to subpoenas from Congress about the gun running operation.
"We had to pry these out of the administration. It was Senator Grassley who actually made the first inquiry," House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz said during an interview with Special Report Wednesday. "Here in writing they [DOJ] are not complying with the law. They are breaking the law by telling us they're only going to provide a couple of the documents."
"When you have a duly issued subpoena, you must comply with it," Chaffetz continued. "There was a concerted effort here to make sure the Congress never saw the light of day on these documents. They still owe us more." 
Operation Fast and Furious was an ATF and Department of Justice program that purposely allowed the sale and trafficking of thousands of weapons to violent Mexican drug cartels. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed by Mexican bandits in December 2010 and guns from the operation were found at the murder scene. When Sinaloa cartel leader El Chapo Guzman was captured last year, guns from the operation, including a .50 caliber rifle that was used to shoot at a police helicopter, were found in his hideout. Hundreds of Mexican citizens have been killed as a result of the program and thousands of guns are still missing and being used to carry out violent crimes in Mexico and potentially in the United States.


Thank You Ms Pavlich and Townhall.
BTW, there's video at townhall but our flashplayer is out of date. Good. Flashplayer gets from us what the ghost of DSM past got.

Thursday, March 17, 2016

Another Fast And Furious Gun Used To Kill Three Mexican Police Officers,

weaselzippers


Obama/Holder disaster lingers on…
Via Hot Air:
It took a while to track this down, but the ATF’s Operation Fast and Furious program claimed three more lives last summer. USA Today reported on Tuesday evening that the Department of Justice acknowledged in a summary presented to Congress that a weapon used in a shootout that killed three Mexican police officers originally came from the ATF in its botched attempt to generate headlines about “straw man” weapons purchases and set the stage for gun-control legislation (via Gabriel Malor):
A new accounting of guns that were allowed to be trafficked to Mexico as part of a botched U.S. firearms investigation shows that one of the weapons was used last year in a deadly shootout that left three Mexican police officers dead.
A Justice Department summary provided to two Republican congressional committee chairmen Tuesday found that a WASR-10 rifle, purchased six years before in the U.S., was one of three rifles fired in the July 27 assault in the town of Valle de Zaragoza. It was not immediately known which weapon caused the officers’ fatal wounds.
Nevertheless, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives officials traced the WASR rifle to a Nov. 12, 2009, transaction that was part of the flawed federal gun trafficking operation, known as “Operation Fast and Furious.”
 Thank You Nick and Hot Air. 


And the comment of the day goes to Hovercat.

"If we keep arming the drug dealers, MEXICO will build the wall."

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

The 'Progressive' Crime Wave Grows

frontpagemag

Murder, murder, everywhere, but Obama's not to blame.

Matthew Vadum
Murder rates are skyrocketing in large U.S. cities, but President Obama's progressive pro-crime policies and endless racial provocations have nothing to do with it, the New York Times predictably declared in a recent article.
Nowadays Americans are being killed and maimed explicitly because of their race. Execution-style cop killings are becoming distressingly common. Killings and vicious assaults based on the skin color of the civilian victim are also becoming common.
That any of this is happening shouldn't surprise anyone who follows public events. For years media outlets have acted as uncompensated publicists for the Obama administration's ongoing campaign to turn America into the progressive paradise that is Robert Mugabe's Zimbabwe.
And they're still doing it today. Some downplay the evidence of a crime wave.
Smug left-wing journalists Jason Linkins of the Huffington Post and Jesse Walker of Reason snickered at the Manhattan Institute's Heather Mac Donald when she argued in late May that after two decades of falling crime rates nationwide, anti-cop sentiment was boosting crime rates.
The "most plausible explanation of the current surge in lawlessness is the intense agitation against American police departments over the past nine months," wrote Mac Donald in a Wall Street Journal op-ed. Walker wrote at the time that "any talk of a 'nationwide' crime surge is at best premature, at worst sheer fearmongering." Linkins wrote that Mac Donald's column contained "a load of hot nonsense."
The legacy media has helped to inflame racial tensions in a country that had relative racial harmony before Barack Hussein Obama was inaugurated. So it shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who has been following the news that the dead-tree and TV network media outlets are now covering up Obama's role and their own in stirring the pot.
Reporting from Milwaukee, Wisc., the Old Gray Lady explains:
Cities across the nation are seeing a startling rise in murders after years of declines, and few places have witnessed a shift as precipitous as this city. With the summer not yet over, 104 people have been killed this year — after 86 homicides in all of 2014. More than 30 other cities have also reported increases in violence from a year ago.
According to the New York Times article dated Sept. 1, homicides committed to this point this year are outpacing homicides committed to this point in 2014.
The report highlights these troubled cities: Milwaukee (murders up 76 percent); St. Louis (up 60 percent); Baltimore (up 56 percent); Washington, D.C. (up 44 percent); New Orleans (up 22 percent); Chicago (up 20 percent); Kansas City, Mo. (up 20 percent); Dallas (up 17 percent); New York (up 9 percent); and Philadelphia (up 4 percent).
But Obama and the Left are not to blame.
Times reporters Monica Davey and Mitch Smith seem genuinely perplexed, scratching their heads wondering where all this bloody violence might be coming from.
Law enforcement experts blame "disparate factors" though "no one is claiming to know for sure why murder rates are climbing," Davey and Smith write. Recycling boilerplate from old news articles, they write that rivalries between "organized street gangs," "the availability of guns," and "a growing willingness among disenchanted young men in poor neighborhoods to use violence to settle ordinary disputes" are major factors.
Maybe it's the "Ferguson effect," they speculate, describing it as "the notion that less aggressive policing has emboldened criminals." Although it "is a popular theory for the uptick in violence," they write that "many experts dispute that theory." They quote criminology professor Alfred Blumstein of Carnegie Mellon University saying, "[t]he equilibrium has changed between police and offenders."
St. Louis, Mo., police chief Sam Dotson has been credited with coining the term the "Ferguson effect." He was referring to the Left's never-ending drumbeat against the police which is causing some cops to refrain from using force when it is appropriate. Recently in Birmingham, Alabama, a plainclothes police officer was beaten senseless by an angry black driver. The cop admits he hesitated in defending himself because he was afraid he might be called racist.
This pervasive cop-hatred contributed to civil unrest last fall in Ferguson, a St. Louis suburb, both before and after a grand jury decided not to indict white police officer Darren Wilson for killing young black male Michael Brown. Brown, who had just held up a convenience store minutes before, battered the policeman, and tried to grab his handgun. Wilson shot Brown in self-defense but the politically motivated lie that Wilson gunned him down while he was trying to surrender persists and the media perpetuates this lie by continuing to describe Brown as an unarmed black man instead of explaining the circumstances of the case. (One notable exception is theWashington Post's Jonathan Capehart, a black left-wing columnist who acknowledged in March that Wilson was a victim of Brown, and not the other way around.)
Of course the New York Times and the rest of the mainstream media have done everything in their power to ramp up racial hostility across the fruited plain during the Obama presidency.
They lied about why Darren Wilson had to shoot his would-be killer "gentle giant" Michael Brown. They turned racist, black, gay Obama supporter Vester Lee Flanagan II, who murdered two white former TV station colleagues (in part because they were white) during a live broadcast in Virginia, into an example of why more gun control was needed. They sat by silently as then-Attorney General Eric Holder let voter intimidation charges against New Black Panther Party members in Philadelphia slide because black-shirted black nationalists are an important component of the Obama coalition.
Then there is President Obama's relentless anti-police rhetoric, a toxic blend of anti-white racism and Marxist cop-hatred. It is as if Obama pal Bill Ayers, the unrepentant terrorist and Black Power supporter who helped to launch Obama's political career, were running the White House communications office.
Execution-style cop killings and assaults on police are becoming more commonplace ever since two New York City police officers were gunned down in their squad car last December.
Houston sheriff's deputy Darren Goforth, a white man, was shot point-blank in cold blood 15 times last month reportedly by a black man named Shannon J. Miles. But there is no racial motive, we have been assured. "Mental illness" is to blame, the media report. The riots in Baltimore and Ferguson, Mo., were understandable "uprisings" against the unjust status quo that holds black people down, they say.
Obama's progressive soulmates have also played a role in the new crime wave.
This summer oft-deported illegal alien Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez became the poster child for so-called sanctuary cities across America which harbor illegals and frustrate federal immigration enforcement efforts. He murdered Kate Steinle in cold blood at a San Francisco tourist destination for no apparent reason.
Steinle's blood is on the hands of the radical left-wing sheriff, Ross Mirkarimi (D), who set Lopez-Sanchez loose on the streets over the objections of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Federal officials had characterized the man as an "enforcement priority" and filed an "immigration detainer" asking jail officials to hold him until they could take custody. Mirkarimi let him go because like a good progressive he doesn't believe the nation should have enforced borders. That any desperado who wants should be able to saunter in the United States is also apparently the view of the Obama administration.
Meanwhile, much of the anger in the streets that has turned into rioting and looting sprees has been underwritten by radical anti-American financier George Soros to advance the goals of the Black Lives Matter movement. Much of the rest of it has been inspired by the community organizer in the White House and his minion, the former Attorney General Eric Holder. The mainstream media has been playing a supporting role, turning every police shooting of a person of color into a cause célèbre, regardless of the circumstances leading to the shooting.
And as each day goes by the rhetoric from the black-nationalist Left grows more chilling, unchallenged by the Obama administration and the mainstream media.
Last month Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan openly called for the slaughter of white Americans. Farrakhan called for "10,000 fearless men" to come forward and get the massacres underway. "Retaliation is a prescription from God to calm the breasts of those who kill us. Stalk them and kill them let them feel the pain of death that we are feeling."
Black-supremacist King Noble announced in a YouTube video that it's time to start to murdering Americans, Breitbart News reports.
"It's open season on killing white people and cops. It's unavoidable, unescapable.
It's funny that now we're moving to a time where the predator will become the prey."
Noble continued:
Today we live in a time where the white man will be picked off and there's nothing he can do about it. His day is up. His time is up. We will witness more executions and killing of white people and cops than we ever have before. We see with the Houston, Texas shooting and we see with the news reporting shooting in Virginia, it's about to go down. It's open season on killing white people and crackers. The Black Lives Matter movement wasn't enough.
He added:
It's not safe no more to be white in America. Lurking behind any corner could be an angry black man ready to take yo ass out. It's a reality. It's open season on killing whites and police and they better make some serious, serious changes, social changes, at this point, but it ain't looking good.
At time of writing, the viral video posted Aug. 30 had been viewed more than 444,000 times.
Normally this kind of extremist rhetoric would be ignored or laughed at, but we do not live in normal times.
President Obama doesn't condemn any of it, which is reason for all Americans to worry.
 Tags: Crime, Left, Obama
Thank You Mr Vadum and FPM.

And the President is busying himself with? Between stirring up race riots and murders?

If you have a webpage, blog, etc, repost these.

There are going to be a gazillion selfies of 'The One' smiling for his stick to clutter up the truth about who he really was. 



Same message. Both pics.

Sunday, August 2, 2015

Gun Used By Islamic Terrorist In Garland Attack Was A "Fast And Furious" Gun

weaselzippers
Courtesy Eric Holder…

Five years before he was shot to death in the failed terrorist attack in Garland, Texas, Nadir Soofi walked into a suburban Phoenix gun shop to buy a 9-millimeter pistol.
At the time, Lone Wolf Trading Co. was known among gun smugglers for selling illegal firearms. And with Soofi’s history of misdemeanor drug and assault charges, there was a chance his purchase might raise red flags in the federal screening process.
Inside the store, he fudged some facts on the form required of would-be gun buyers.
What Soofi could not have known was that Lone Wolf was at the center of a federal sting operation known as Fast and Furious, targeting Mexican drug lords and traffickers. The idea of the secret program was to allow Lone Wolf to sell illegal weapons to criminals and straw purchasers, and track the guns back to large smuggling networks and drug cartels.
HT: Katie Pavlich
Thank You Chicago Trib, Katie Pavlich, and Nick

Eric Holder To Fast And Furious Critics: 'Kiss My Ass' - Fox ...


Monday, May 11, 2015

Former NYPD Commish: Eric Holder's To Blame For The "War On Police"

weaselzippers;
Yup. Although I think we all know there’s several more that can be equally blamed…
Howard Safir, former NYPD Police Commissioner ripped into former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder for starting a war against police officers and law enforcement agents.
“Speaking on “The Cats Roundtable” on AM 970, the commish for four years under Rudy Giuliani expressed hope for a federal inquiry into the Baltimore Police Department, which will be led by new Attorney General Loretta Lynch.”
“Unfortunately, Eric Holder, the previous attorney general, had a war on police. He spent more time investigating police departments than he did investigating criminals,” Safir told host John Catsimatidis.
Holder played a visible role in situations that have turned into anti-police movements, especially in Ferguson, Missouri with the Michael Brown/Darren Wilson shooting.
Thank You Mr Stone and Truth Revolt 

FBI: Cop Killings Have Nearly Doubled In Past Year.


Obama Foundation: First "Eight Years Is Only The Beginning".


Obama DOJ Invokes Mike Brown, Freddie Gray To Slam America's Police For Being Racist At U.N. Human Rights Council Meeting

Saturday, April 11, 2015

Eric Holder Has To Remind Justice Dept Employees Not To Solicit Prostitutes


It’s come to this.
[Ed; the next earthquake you feel will be J. Edgar Hoover rolling in his grave.]
Via WaPo:
On Friday, Attorney General Eric Holder issued a memo to everyone in the Department of Justice reminding them that they should not become customers in the commercial sex trade — and not just because of the threat of extortion or blackmail, either.
“Regardless of whether prostitution is legal or tolerated in a particular jurisdiction,” Holder wrote, “soliciting prostitutes creates a greater demand for human trafficking victims and a consequent increase in the number of minor and adult persons trafficked into commercial sex slavery.”
While there’s some debate, a 2012 study largely reinforces Holder’s point. “On average,” its authors write, “countries with legalized prostitution experience a larger degree of reported human trafficking inflows.” And they have a scatterplot to demonstrate it.

Thank You WaPo and Zip.