"For What Possible Use Should You Keep Such A Treacherous And Savage Creature?" Marcus Tullius Cicero
Monday, April 3, 2017
Massachusetts: Behavioral Health: $193 Million Up In Smoke
Funny how Behavioral Health can identify, condemn and track thoughts, moods and behaviors as incurable diseases but they can't get a handle on $193 Million Dollars which is something any kid with a cell phone can photograph.
Audit Reveals $193 Million In Improper MassHealth Behavioral Health Payments
And the comment of the day goes to KTM 500
"Imagine what kind of article this would have been if Susan (State Auditor) Bump wasn't a Democrat?"
The comments will tell you far more of what you need to know than the official Democrat State Auditor will.
State Audit Finds $193 Million In Improper Payments From MassHealth
Here we go. Someone who doesn't appear to have any wild hairs about reblogging Their investigation.
The Somerville News Weekly
April 3rd, 2017
Audit Finds Almost $193 Million In Improper or Questionable Behavioral Health Payments By MassHealth.
Deficiencies Similar to Previous MassHealth Audit Findings
[Ed; Color us Shocked! No, actually, not in the slightest.]
BOSTON, MA — State Auditor Suzanne M. Bump today issued an audit of the behavioral health program at MassHealth, which found that MassHealth paid doctors directly for providing mental health services that should have been paid for by the Massachusetts Behavior Health Partnership (MBHP). MBHP is paid by MassHealth to manage the coordination of care for mental health services for MassHealth members. MassHealth’s payments over a five year period to doctors for services that should have been paid for by MBHP resulted in improper payments of approximately $93 million, and another $100 million in questionable payments for services that should have been included in MBHP’s contract. In the audit, Bump calls on MassHealth to immediately improve its processes to prevent any further improper payments, and determine whether it can recoup any monies paid.
“This audit is the latest example of poor claims administration at MassHealth,” Bump said. “Some of the problems identified stem from MassHealth and its contractors’ different understandings of who is to pay what; other times MassHealth simply acts contrary to its own rules and standards.”
MassHealth has a contract with MBHP to provide behavioral-health care and substance-abuse care for certain MassHealth members at a fixed monthly fee. During the audit period, July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2015, MassHealth paid MBHP approximately $2.6 billion. The contract specifies the types of services and procedures that MBHP must provide to members; however, the audit found that while MassHealth made these monthly payments to MBHP to cover the specified services, it also directly paid doctors approximately $93 million for the same services.
Additionally, the audit found that MassHealth made approximately $100 million in questionable payments for items such as family therapy sessions, behavioral-health counseling, and psychological testing, which are clearly behavioral health in nature, but were not specifically included in the list of services covered by MassHealth’s contract with MBHP. The audit cites MassHealth regulations that require that all behavioral health services be paid for by MBHP.
Finally, the audit also found that MassHealth paid claims for behavioral health services provided in emergency rooms, rather than referring these claims to MBHP for payment, as required by MassHealth regulations. The audit notes that this practice creates a financial incentive for MBHP to allow its members to seek behavioral-health care in emergency rooms.
In its response, MassHealth said, among other things, that the Auditor wrongly included in her office’s analysis claims with medical treatment components, which made the agency, and not MBHP, the proper payer. However, Bump noted that those claims were not included in the analysis.
In 2015, an audit from Bump’s office found similar deficiencies in MassHealth’s administration of managed care organizations (MCO) and related contracts. Similar to MBHP, MassHealth pays these MCOs a fixed-fee to cover the costs of a range of medical services for certain MassHealth members. The 2015 audit found MassHealth unnecessarily paid approximately $233 million to doctors for services that should have been covered under these MCO contracts. In addition, it found that the agency could have additionally saved up to $288 million if its MCO contracts had been more specific as to which services were to be paid for by the contract. If all of that audits recommendations changes were made, they could save the program approximately $10 million annually.
“As leaders in our state seek solutions to address the growth of MassHealth costs, our audits have shown time and again that the program must improve its contracts to ensure that they cover all appropriate costs, and strengthen their claims process to ensure the program only pays for appropriate claims. This would yield significant costs savings and could prevent the need to raise fees or reduce benefits,” Bump said. “Our initial estimates suggest that the recommended changes identified in this audit alone could save the program up to $27 million annually. It’s my hope that today’s audit will assist policymakers in their efforts to control costs in this important program.”
In fiscal year 2016, MassHealth paid healthcare providers $14.8 billion for healthcare services for approximately 1.9 million low-and-moderate income individuals. MassHealth is the state’s largest program and accounts for approximately one-third of the state budget.
Thank You Somerville News Weekly.
Deficiencies Similar to Previous MassHealth Audit Findings
What else would you expect coming from a playbook that ultimately leads back to This Anti Semitic, Hitler Worshipping Jerk?
Carl Jung's Jackass Archetypes
Carl Jung's Mind
Thursday, May 22, 2014
Dem Senator Ed Markey Wants $10 Million A Year For CDC To Treat Guns Like A Disease
WASHINGTON — If U.S. Sen. Ed Markey gets his way, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will again begin researching the root causes of gun-related violence in America thanks to millions in funding a bill he introduced Wednesday would provide.Markey and U.S. Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., introduced bicameral legislation calling for the CDC to receive $10 million each year for six years beginning in fiscal year 2015 to fund research on gun violence prevention and firearms safety.A 1996 bill passed by Congress and backed by the National Rifle Association effectively slashed gun violence research from $2.5 million to approximately $100,000. President Barack Obama in Jan. 2013, following the shooting deaths of 20 children and six adults in Newtown, Conn. a month earlier, signed an executive order which effectively ended the funding freeze.Obama included $10 million in his budget proposal released in March of this year after lifting the 17-year ban on federal gun violence research through his executive order, but action by Congress is needed to ensure future funding.“It is time we study the issue of gun violence like the public health crisis it is. If we want to prevent injury and deaths from guns, we need to know what can be done to prevent it,” Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, said in a statement. “No one should be afraid of more non-partisan, scientific research of this issue – not Democrats, not Republicans, and not the NRA.”
Thank You Masslive and Zip.
Right, let's turn it over to the CDC: a Govt. Medical Bureaucracy since medicine is doing such a bang up job already.
Saturday, May 10, 2014
Mass. Failed ObamaCare Website Has Cost Half A Billion Dollars . . . State Asks Feds For Another $121 Million To Fix It

The funny thing is the Mass exchange worked fine when it was under Romneycare, the second they switched it over to comply with Obamacare it fell apart.
The total cost to implement Obamacare in Massachusetts surpassed a half-billion dollars yesterday, as the Health Connector board agreed to seek an additional $121 million in federal funds to try to rescue the money-hemorrhaging health exchange.“This is now Massachusetts’ Big Dig I.T. project,” said Joshua Archambault, a health care expert at the Pioneer Institute. “The decision was completely irresponsible to taxpayers, with very little uncertainty we’re going to get the end result that we want.”The board approved a two-track plan yesterday — invoking an emergency provision to sidestep state procurement laws — to award a no-bid contract to Minnesota-based Optum. The company will, in turn, subcontract with hCentive — which it holds a 24 percent stake in, as the Herald first reported yesterday.Connector officials insisted the exchange is so broken they had no choice.“The reality is, this is it,” said Sarah Iselin, the state’s Obamacare czar. “When we look at what we can reasonably do for the fall, this is it. I wish we had more choices, but we don’t. We’re making the best of a really lousy situation.”Federal taxpayers will be asked to shell out the cost of pursuing a “dual track” of simultaneously implementing software to build a new state exchange and joining the federal Healthcare.gov as a fallback plan.Only board member George Gonser Jr. voted no, arguing it could make insurance more expensive.“We all know there’s an incredible impact on the carriers, and … these costs trickle down to users and subscribers and small businesses,” he said.
Thank You Boston Herald and Zip.
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Massachusetts Considers Denying Constitutional Rights To Innocent Arrestees
And Why Not? We allow the Mental/Political Health crowd the same Unconstitutional Authority based upon their mastery of the defective Politics of Atheists, Nazis, and Communists run through a Democratically Concocted/Ideated Phone Book of Phony Diseases.
What is it about school shootings that so lobotomizes the political and academic classes? Per Boston.com:More than a year after the school shootings in Newtown, Conn., a panel of academic experts today released a long-awaited report recommending that Massachusetts tighten its gun laws, which are already considered among the toughest in the country.The panel made 44 recommendations, including that Massachusetts join a national mental health database for screening potential gun owners, that it beef up firearms training requirements, and that it eliminate Class B gun licenses, which are seldom used.It recommended that the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association help define a series of factors that could be used to prohibit “unsuitable persons” from acquiring firearms. The panel said the current process allows local law enforcement officials too much discretion to determine whether a person is suitable to be granted a license to carry.This is your standard reactionary nonsense, guaranteed to have no effect in a state that already boasts some of the strongest gun-control laws in the United States and designed primarily to make people who know nothing about firearms feel better about themselves. But it is what comes next that should horrify one and all – regardless of their politics:It also said Massachusetts should require anyone wanting to purchase a hunting rifle or a shotgun to pass those standards of suitability. That could allow local police chiefs to deny gun purchases to people who have been arrested, but not convicted, of a crime.
Counterpoint.
The ballad of Officer Jody Putnam who discharged his firearm and when that failed to ensure the public's safety used his mace, . . . on a squirrel, in a Dollar Store.
Cop Shoots Squirrel, Maces Squirrel, but Fired for No Paperwork on Incident.
But the State of Massachusetts, if someone has been arrested but neither tried nor convicted, . . . well, . . . they Must have done Something to piss off the Govt. or they wouldn't have been arrested in the first place.
Friday, November 18, 2011
Congress Invests: The Fix Is In, For Pfizer And JNJ
Most Popular Congressional Investments, 2010
Just like many Americans, our elected officials like to play it safe with their investments, betting largely on blue chip companies across diverse industry groups. The chart below shows the most common assets among all members of Congress who served during all or part of 2010, ranked by the number of members invested in them, with breakdowns by party.
Note: Senate, House, Executive branch and Judicial rules require the disclosure of items belonging to the filer's spouse and/or dependent children. When present, those items are displayed on this page and are included in all calculations throughout this section.
Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit the Center for Responsive Politics. For permission to reprint for commercial uses, such as textbooks, contact the Center.
Thank You Very Much, Open Secrets, and a hat tip to Ms Tracy Staton at Fierce Pharma for the heads up. And what is it that Congress is Buying, for their Own portfolios?
Allen Jones Full Whistleblower Report pg 23:
"Journalist Robert Whitaker, via the Freedom of Information Act gained access to FDA data on
the drug trials for the Atypicals Risperdal, Seroqual and Zyprexa. Whitaker found that:
1. One in every 145 patients who entered the trials died, and yet those deaths were never
mentioned in the scientific literature.
2. The trials were structured to favor the Atypicals and most of the study reports were
discounted by the FDA as being biased.
3. One in every thirty-five patients in Risperdal trials experienced a serious adverse event, defined by the FDA as a life threatening event or one that required hospitalization.
4. Twenty-two percent of patients in Zyprexa trials suffered serious adverse events
5. The Atypicals did not demonstrate superior effectiveness or safety over Typical
antipsychotics.
It is important to note that a drug company does not have to prove that a new drug is safer or
more effective than an old drug to gain FDA approval. Essentially, the manufacturer has to
demonstrate that the drug is proved to yield better results than placebo in a statistically
significant number of patients in short-term trials (6-8 weeks).
Suicide attempt was associated with discontinuation in 1.2% of RISPERDAL!-treated patients compared to 0.6% of placebo patients, but, given the almost 40-fold greater exposure time in RISPERDAL! compared to placebo patients, it is unlikely that suicide attempt is a RISPERDAL!-related adverse event (see PRECAUTIONS). Discontinuation for extrapyramidal symptoms was 0% in placebo patients, but 3.8% in active-control patients in the Phase 2 and 3 trials.
Yeah, a 100% Increase in actual Suicide Attempts, but it's probably not the drug which is Inflicted/Marketed as a Suicide Preventative, ......... .
"this Court finds the actions of the Defendants, upon this audience, to be detestable."
"Annual Sales of Risperdal worldwide per annual reports of Johnson & Johnson, Inc.1994: $0.172 Billion1995: $0.343 Billion1996: $0.502 Billion1998: $0.588 Billion1999: $0.892 Billion2000: $1.083 Billion2001: $1.845 Billion2002: $2.146 Billion2003: $2.512 Billion2004: $3.05 Billion2005: $3.552 Billion2006: $4.180 Billion2007: $4.697 Billion2008: $1.309 Billion2009: $1.425 Billion2010: $1.50 BillionTotal for the period: $29.796 BillionTestimony at trial indicated that the profit margin for sales of Risperdal was 97% or $28.90 Billion for the period of 1994-2010"
Are you going to Pay Attention from now until Election Day?
Are you going to call your current Elected Representatives and ask them What, they think they're doing?
Thank You 60 Minutes.




