Showing posts with label Civil Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Civil Rights. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Small Town's Entire Police Force Resigns, Citing Council That Asked For Illegal Favors

It has come to this.

dailycaller
Amber Randall
10:29 AM 12/14/2016 




A small town in Indiana witnessed its entire police force resign recently amid accusations that council officials were making odd demands of dubious legality.

The officers, who submitted their resignations Monday, hold Bunker Hill Town Council responsible, alleging that the city council asked cops to do things like background checks on local rivals, reports Fox 59.

“We have had issues with the town board and there are some activities there where I felt like they were serving their own agenda,” Michael Thomison, a former Bunker Hill Town Marshal, declared.

Thomison maintained the city council asked the department to run background checks and investigate criminal history on fellow board members.

“They would ask for things and I would have to explain to them, you can’t have this information,” Thomison said. “They asked for me to run background checks and criminal history on other board members, and I told them, ‘I can’t do that without a case number and without an investigation.’”

Council members threatened officers when they refused to look into other members, officers said.

Officers also quit over safety issues, according to their resignation letters. The department only had one set of body armor, which put their lives in danger, the letter said.

“I did not want to send someone out there with bad body armor so I would take mine off and provide it to the other officers. I told them we have to provide this, there is an IC code that explains that and says that the town has to provide that body armor,” Thomison said.


Thomison said he contacted Indiana State Police, the Miami County Sheriff’s Office and the Miami County prosecutor about the department’s decision.

The Sheriff’s Office will patrol the town in the time being. The Town Board will release a statement on the issue Wednesday.
Thank You Ms Randall and DC.


If Civil Rights and the rule of law were actually worth anything, . . this problem wouldn't have come to this pass.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_avoidance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Therapeutic_jurisprudence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Therapeutic_privilege



U.S. Title 42 Sec 1985 Conspiracy To Interfere With Civil Rights
 
(1) Preventing officer from performing duties
 
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties;

Put those Council members in the same conspiracy, take them to Court, sue for restitution and damages.

Monday, November 21, 2016

Attorney General Sessions: Civil Rights Hero

frontpagemag

Leftist racists shamefully smear a public servant who has steadfastly fought for civil rights -- and against racist abuses.
November 21, 2016
Daniel Greenfield


The last lynching in the United States began when Michael Donald, a 19-year-old African-American man, was kidnapped by two Klansmen. They forced him into the car at gunpoint, beat him, tied a rope around his neck, cut his throat three times and left him hanging from a tree on Herndon Street in Mobile, Alabama.

The search for justice ended two years later when U.S. Attorney Jeff Sessions announced that the killers had been arrested. Local authorities had botched the case badly. But Sessions was determined to see that justice would be done. Federal and State resources were combined for a successful outcome.

The case brought an end to lynching culture and broke the KKK. But the man whose office investigated the case, who helped send one of the killers to the electric chair, would be smeared as a racist despite his history of fighting for civil rights and against racist abuses in dozens of court cases.

And it was those radical activists smearing him as a racist who had been exploiting black people.

The man named by President-elect Trump as his nominee for Attorney General of the United States had always played fair. Unlike so many on the left, he didn’t come wielding a racial double standard.

And that made him enemies.

When black voters complained about voter fraud being perpetrated, Sessions stepped in. The voter fraud was being committed by black activists. Among them was an influential figure whose past made him a hero to some. Ballots had been altered after voting. The defendants were caught mailing hundreds of absentee ballots by FBI agents. Others had been searching hospitals and nursing homes for the names of patients whose names could be forged on absentee ballots.

The abuses were truly despicable. In one case an African-American resident complained that her blind husband’s ballot had been altered and when she complained, she was warned to change her testimony.

The last best defense for voter fraud by the exploiters and abusers of black people was to cry racism.

The White House was racist. The FBI was racist. Sessions was racist. But the despicable lie was quickly shot down by the African-American public officials who had fallen victim to the fraud.

African-American Perry County Commissioner Reese Billingslea said, "It's not a black-white issue -- race has nothing to do with it."

John Kennard, Alabama's first black tax assessor, was one of those complaining about the absentee ballot fraud. He laughed off the racism defense. "The only reason these people are hollering racism now is because they are in trouble for breaking the law."

But the African-American accusers were dismissed as confused elderly folks who had been browbeaten by the FBI and the African-American officials as race traitors who were conspiring with whites.

And once they were dismissed, it was easy to smear Jeff Sessions as a racist.

But those radical activists smearing Sessions as a racist had been the ones abusing and exploiting black people. As were the Senate Democrats who had revived and exploited the same shameful lies.

And as are the media outlets who are trying to smear Sessions all over again.

Sessions had vowed to respond to “any substantiated charge of vote fraud against whites or blacks.” He was doing his job by fighting for the civil rights and voting rights of all people regardless of race. But despite helping bring the murderers of Michael Donald to justice and his work on desegregating Alabama schools, when Sessions was nominated for a judgeship, the racism accusations returned.

The biggest source of the racism accusations against Sessions was Thomas Figures, a former assistant U.S. Attorney who would later be indicted on bribery charges for allegedly trying to bribe a drug dealer. One of Figures’ witnesses said that she had never heard Sessions make any racist remarks about him.

Sessions’ other accuser, J. Gerald Hebert, who is white, has said that he doesn’t believe Sessions is a racist. This is how weak and worthless the accusations of racism being circulated by the media are.

But the media harassed Sessions’ elderly parents and panned for character witnesses everywhere. An African-American mechanic who knew Sessions “since he was a baby" assured reporters that he wasn’t racist. Still the lie lived on and Ted Kennedy, Leahy and Biden got their way and blocked Sessions.

Then he became one of the U.S. Attorneys fired by Bill Clinton. Instead of becoming Judge Sessions, he ran for office and eventually became Senator Sessions. Despite the racism accusations, he sponsored legislation to give Rosa Parks a Congressional Gold Medal and obtained funds for the Rosa Parks Library.

In paying tribute to her, the man being denounced as a racist, stated firmly that, “Although the mantra was `separate but equal,'' the reality was separate and unequal.”

The shameful attacks on this civil rights hero have resurfaced every time he advanced forward. The left blocked Sessions from his judgeship using the racism smear. But they couldn’t stop him from becoming Senator Sessions. When he became the ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, the same old lies were dragged out.

And now it’s happening all over again.

There has never been any shortage of African-American colleagues and friends to step up and shoot down the lies. Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson called Sessions “a good and honest man untainted by any form of prejudice.”

The latest is civil rights attorney Donald V. Watkins who desegregated public schools, universities and housing in Alabama and represented the last known surviving “Scottsboro Boy”. Watkins speaks of a 46-year relationship with Sessions from the time when he became the first white student to invite him to join a campus organization, the Young Republicans, to the present when he expresses his regrets for not having come forward as a character witness during the old judgeship hearings.

Watkins writes, “My personal connection with Jeff was genuine, deep and born out of ordinary acts of kindness.”

“If we truly believe in the promise of America, we must stand up for its ideals and principles when they matter the most. Integrity, accountability, transparency, decency and fairness are the hallmarks of good government, not race, gender, party affiliation, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, or one’s socio-economic status in life. If and when we stand up for America’s core principles, we are truly serving our nation.”

That is what civil rights truly mean. These are the principles that Jeff Sessions has fought for both in the court system and in the legislature. They are the principles that make him a civil rights hero.

As U.S. Attorney and in the United States Senate, Sessions refused to pander to racists or to maintain racial double standards. Instead he firmly believed that everyone must enjoy the same rights and responsibilities. But when he enforced the law against white defendants, he was praised as a hero and when the defendants were black, then he was suddenly being denounced as a racist.

That is the perverse way that the left has warped civil rights to suit its own political ends. And restoring equal justice to the Department of Justice will be Attorney General Sessions’ biggest challenge. It is a challenge that his career of principled stands has amply qualified him to meet. Sessions is a public servant who has paid the price for doing the right thing over and over again.

Now he will have the opportunity to do the right thing for America.


Thank You Mr Greenfield and FPM.

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Civil Rights Commission Democrat Wants Campus Speech Codes

Eric Owens
Education Editor

A Democrat on the U.S. Civil Rights Commission has urged campus restrictions on First Amendment-protected speech because, he believes, the still-developing brains of college students cannot properly process certain dangerous ideas.
The civil rights commissioner is Michael Yaki, a former senior adviser to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.
The Washington Post’s Eugene Volokh was present at a commission briefing on sexual harassment law in education last week when Yaki made his bizarro comments.
The civil rights commissioner said he favors outlawing speech that would be grossly unpopular, such as “a slave auction at a fraternity engagement” or a celebration of Latino culture that involves “making everyone dress as janitors and mop floors.”
Yaki also wants to turn Miss America-type pageants into campus speech crimes. He expressed his belief in the unacceptable dangers of “a situation involving women” in which they “parade around in skimpy clothing and turn in some show or something.”
In embarrassingly vague fashion, Yaki struggled mightily to make some kind of coherent point at the civil rights commission hearing.
“I mean where do you think you can, that the university can’t deal with ensuring the route it has environment that is not oppressive or hostile because obviously a campus, especially certain types of campuses where there’s a lot of — where — that are geographically compact, that have a lot of working and living situations in a close area to create a campus atmosphere,” the language-addled law school graduate stuttered.
“Doesn’t that gravitate toward having greater ability to proscribe certain types of conduct that have the ability to escalate beyond what anyone would consider to be reasonable or acceptable?”
Yaki, who spent many of his formative years in highly authoritarian countries, then distinguished himself from fellow garden-variety progressives who seek to criminalize ideas they don’t like by, hilariously, suggesting that his repressive views are backed by scientists (and citing a Supreme Court case concerning the death penalty).
“It has to do with science,” Yaki confidently explained. “More and more, the vast majority, in fact — I think — overall in bodies of science is that young people, not just K through 12 but also between the ages of 16 to 20, 21 is where the brain is still in a stage of development.”
He went on to argue that “the juvenile or adolescent or young adult brain processes information” in ways that are “vastly different from the way that we adults do.” Consequently, he proclaimed, “when we sit back and talk about what is right or wrong in terms of First Amendment jurisprudence from a reasonable person’s standpoint, we are really not looking into the same referential viewpoint.”
The civil rights commissioner then laid out his sweeping, anti-free speech conclusion.
“There are very good and compelling reasons why broader policies and prohibitions on conduct in activities and in some instances speech are acceptable on a college campus level that might not be acceptable say in an adult work environment or in an adult situation,” he said.
Among many others, Hans Bader of the Competitive Enterprise Institute has criticized Yaki for his “depressing” arguments against free speech.
“Yaki’s claim that speech should be especially restricted on campus ‘because of the unique nature of a university campus setting’ turns basic free speech principles upside down,” Bader wrote in a recent essay. “Free speech is especially vital on college campuses, where students can learn how to deal with opposing points of view in a civil and constructive manner.”
Follow Eric on Twitter and on Facebook, and send education-related story tips to erico@dailycaller.com.

From
Wiki;


Michael Yaki (born 1961) is a San Francisco attorney/consultant/political analyst, running his own consulting firm and currently serving as a Commissioner on the United States Commission on Civil Rights,[1] succeeding Christopher Edley, Jr. in February 2005. Yaki graduated from UC Berkeley,[1] and then from Yale Law School.[1] He clerked for Judge Harry Low, the first Chinese-American appointed to the California Court of Appeal. After a brief stint with the law firm of Morrison & Foerster, Yaki was appointed by Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) to be her District Director and as a senior advisor. Yaki was also a former member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, serving from his appointment by then-mayor Willie Brown in February 1996. He ran for election and won in November 1996, and served until his election defeat in 2000. He owns his own consulting company, Michael Yaki Consulting.


From SFappeal.com
December 5, 2013 6:39 am

Former Richmond District Supervisor Sued By City Over Alleged Political Impropriety;


 A former member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors was sued today by the city for allegedly violating its laws regarding lobbyists when he contacted city officials on behalf of a company.
Michael Yaki, who also currently serves on the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, was sued by City Attorney Dennis Herrera today for more than 70 alleged violations of the city’s lobbying ordinance earlier this year.
According to the city attorney’s office, Yaki was representing the company Rescue Air Systems Inc. during the legislative process to revise the city’s fire code but failed to register as a lobbyist, failed to disclose amounts and sources of payments for his lobbying and failed to report lobbying contacts.
“Yaki flouted the lobbyist ordinance in every way,” the city attorney said in the complaint filed today in San Francisco Superior Court.
Herrera noted that Yaki himself voted to support the ordinance in 2000 when he was on the Board of Supervisors.
“The evidence is overwhelming that Mr. Yaki brazenly flouted a law with which he had no excuse to be unfamiliar,” Herrera said in a statement.
Yaki was appointed to the board’s District 1 seat by then-Mayor Willie Brown in 1996 and was elected a year later, then lost his re-election bid in 2001. District 1 covers the Richmond District and other neighborhoods on the western end of the city.
Yaki denied wrongdoing in the case in an email.
“There is an exception within the ordinance allowing attorney representation, and as an attorney I worked within the parameters of the ordinance,” he wrote. “I look forward to positively resolving this matter with the City Attorney.”
The lobbyist ordinance allows for civil penalties of up to $5,000 per violation.
The complaint against Yaki includes 15 declarations from current members of the Board of Supervisors, legislative aides, fire commissioners and Fire Chief Joanne Hayes-White, according to the city attorney’s office.
The San Carlos-based company he represented manufactured a “firefighter air replenishment system” that was required by the city’s fire codes for new buildings 75 feet tall or higher.
Yaki sought to extend the requirement, but was opposed by Hayes-White and other fire officials who said the department had never used or trained on it because they did not have confidence the air in the replenishment system was breathable, according to the city attorney.
The board eventually voted to alter the requirement to offer developers the option of installing the system or a firefighter service elevator that would facilitate oxygen delivery.
Dan McMenamin, Bay City News
Thank You one and All.

San Francisco Richmond District Supervisor.
Some of the Same SF Turf represented in the Ca. State Senate by Alleged Gun Runner Leland Yee (9)
Same Town that gave us Pelosi,
Same turf being 'Mental/Political Healthed' by Richmond Area Multi Services;
Same City that makes entire Psych Hospitals and Staffs, not exist.
In order to be 'Mentally Healthy' you need to be More like These people?

It's not medical. It's political. Take a good look at the Politicals behind it.


Thursday, October 3, 2013

Abolish Tenure Now! Georgia High School Student Charged With FELONY WEAPONS Possession For Bringing Fishing Tackle To School

weaselzippers;
Georgia High School Student Charged With FELONY WEAPONS Possession For Bringing Fishing Tackle To School



Via Daily Caller:
The arrests of several students who unwittingly and accidentally violated school weapon policies has some Georgian lawmakers saying “zero tolerance” makes zero sense.
A Cobb County high school senior was charged with the felony of bringing weapons into a school zone after police found fishing knives in a tackle box in his car. Cody Chitwood, a 17-year-old student at Lassiter High School and avid fisherman, turned himself in and was released on $1,000 bond.
Police were performing a random sweep, and drug-sniffing dogs detected black powder in Chitwood’s car. The powder was residue from a firecracker that had been in the car since Fourth of July, but it was enough to a warrant a full search that turned up the fishing-related weaponry.
“It’s pretty ridiculous,” said Chitwood in a statement to The Marietta Daily Journal. “I have an attorney and I’m hoping to get the felony dropped so I can still get in the Air Force.”

Thank You Zip and Daily Caller.


Want to know what this really is?

Here's the Law. Read it.

Human Rights or Civil Rights: US 18C13 Sec 241 & 242. 


Zero Tolerance?

At What Point do the American People go Zero Tolerance on Police State crap like this?

We're not even talking firearms here but Fishing Tackle in this Citizen's car trunk.