Showing posts with label PTSD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PTSD. Show all posts

Friday, December 8, 2017

NY Psychiatry Researcher Charged With Embezzlement, Faces Jail Time

retraction watch
Nov 29, 2017


A researcher specializing in post-traumatic stress disorder is facing jail time for allegedly embezzling tens of thousands of dollars of federal grant money.

Yesterday, the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) announced criminal charges against Alexander Neumeister, alleging he used the grant funds on trips and meals for family and friends. As the New York Times reported last year, Neumeister was dismissed from his position at New York University (NYU); NYU shut down eight of his studies following an investigation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which found evidence of lax oversight, falsified records, and inaccurate case histories. 

The U.S. Attorney has also filed a civil lawsuit against Neumeister under the False Claims Act, also for misuse of grant funding. The complaint does not specify the total amount of funds he allegedly misused.

In a statement, Acting U.S. Attorney Joon Kim said Neumeister:

fraudulently charged tens of thousands of dollars in personal expenses as research or school-related expenses. For allegedly betraying the trust of the medical school that employed him and the government institute that funded his research, Neumeister now faces serious federal charges.
Those charges include one count of theft of government funds, which carries a maximum prison sentence of 10 years, and one count of wire fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years. In the civil suit, the government can recover three times the alleged damages plus financial penalties for each false claim.
A spokesperson for the OIG told us:

The U.S. Attorney’s Office received an allegation that they looked into. Based on interviews with current and former employees, it was uncovered that some of the test results were skewed and, based on that, the USAO decided to bring charges. Our office is conducting an ongoing investigation in coordination with the USAO.
We asked if this means there is an investigation into research misconduct involving Neumeister; the OIG spokesperson referred us to the US Attorney’s Office. A spokesperson for the US Attorney’s Office said they couldn’t comment further. 

Neumeister was arrested Nov. 21 in Ogdensburg, a New York town on the border with Canada. He’s an Austrian citizen and has surrendered his passport, according to court documents. He has since been released, but his travel is restricted to New York and Connecticut. We contacted the attorney who represented Neumeister in the FDA investigation, but haven’t heard back. 

John Thomas, an attorney at Gentry Locke who is bringing a False Claims Act case against Duke University, told us the Neumeister case is:

…a little bit more than just an embezzlement case. It’s a reminder that universities and principal investigators are stewards of taxpayer dollars.
Neumeister, 51, was principal investigator on several grants issued by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). He has published dozens of papers, one of which was corrected in 2014.
The statement from the US Attorney’s office said that, from 2012 to 2014, Neumeister allegedly used funds from NYU or the NIMH to buy things for his family and a “Friend,” a professional ballet dancer he met in New York in 2012. Items included: 

  • airline tickets so that the Friend could travel from Charlotte, North Carolina, or Salt Lake City, Utah, depending on where the Friend was then living, to New York City, where NEUMEISTER was then living;
  • airline tickets so that NEUMEISTER could travel from New York City to Charlotte and Salt Lake City to visit the Friend, as well as lodging, bar tabs, meals and other travel-related expenses associated with this travel;
  • an all-expense paid trip to Miami Beach for the Friend, during which the Friend was given authorization by NEUMEISTER to use NEUMEISTER’s [credit card] to pay for food, beverages, and beach facilities;
  • an iPhone for the friend; and
  • airline tickets so that NEUMEISTER’s spouse could travel from Newark, New Jersey, to Vienna, Austria, to attend a family event.
The statement alleges:

In addition, NEUMEISTER falsely claimed that the Friend was a research study participant in studies that NEUMEISTER was overseeing for the School, and caused the School to pay over $10,000 of the School’s own funds directly to the Friend.  
The civil complaint said that NYU confronted Neumeister in 2015 about the credit card expenditures after it had conducted an audit. Whether the audit was routine or triggered by something else isn’t clear. 

The complaints — also covered by the New York Daily News — note that Neumeister offered to pay back the allegedly misappropriated funds, but never did.

The FCA suit includes many of the same allegations.
Neumeister’s LinkedIn page says that he’s currently a program director for research supported by the World Health Organization in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

A spokesperson for the NYU School of Medicine told us:

As soon as the potential issues specific to this research were identified and reviewed, findings were shared with the appropriate oversight agencies. The researcher is no longer employed at the School of Medicine.
NYU added:

As a victim of Dr. Neumeister’s actions, as to which NYU School of Medicine may be called to give testimony or further information, it would be inappropriate to provide additional comment while the federal investigation is ongoing.
Thomas said that this case, and the FCA case that Columbia University settled last year for $9.5 million over problematic costs arising out of grant, could be the beginning of a trend:

It shows the Southern District of New York is paying close attention to grant fraud.
Hat tip: Theresa Defino

Like Retraction Watch? Consider making a tax-deductible contribution to support our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, sign up on our homepage for an email every time there’s a new post, or subscribe to our daily digest. Click here to review our Comments Policy. For a sneak peek at what we’re working on, click here. If you have comments or feedback, you can reach us at retractionwatchteam@gmail.com.


Thank You Retraction Watch. 


What do you expect from an Industry that charges the tax payers for it to Ideate?

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Thursday, October 30, 2014

Climate Scientists Suffering From "Pre-Traumatic" Stress Disorder, Because No One Takes Their Predictions Seriously

How can you not love the Hilarious Irony of these Fraudsters, both the Climate Hoaxers and the Diagnosers? 

weaselzippers
Yes, pre-traumatic.
Via Grist:
Two years ago, Camille Parmesan, a professor at Plymouth University and the University of Texas at Austin, became so “professionally depressed” that she questioned abandoning her research in climate change entirely.
Parmesan has a pretty serious stake in the field. In 2007, she shared a Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore for her work as a lead author of the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In 2009, The Atlantic named her one of 27 “Brave Thinkers” for her work on the impacts of climate change on species around the globe. Barack Obama and Mark Zuckerberg were also on the list. [...]
“In the U.S., [climate change] isn’t well-supported by the funding system, and when I give public talks in the U.S., I have to devote the first half of the talk to [the topic] that climate change is really happening,” says Parmesan, now a professor at Plymouth University in England.
Parmesan certainly isn’t the first to experience some sort of climate-change blues. From depression to substance abuse to suicide and post-traumatic stress disorder, growing bodies of research in the relatively new field of psychology of global warming suggest that climate change will take a pretty heavy toll on the human psyche as storms become more destructive and droughts more prolonged. For your everyday environmentalist, the emotional stress suffered by a rapidly changing Earth can result in some pretty substantial anxieties. [...]
“I don’t know of a single scientist that’s not having an emotional reaction to what is being lost,” Parmesan is quoted saying in the National Wildlife Federation’s 2012 report, “The Psychological Effects of Global Warming on the United States: And Why the U.S. Mental Health Care System is Not Adequately Prepared.” “It’s gotten to be so depressing that I’m not sure I’m going to go back to this particular site again,” she says, referring to an ocean reef she has studied since 2002, “because I just know I’m going to see more and more of it dead, and bleached, and covered with brown algae.”
Lise Van Susteren, a forensic psychiatrist based in Washington, D.C. — and co-author of the National Wildlife Federation’s report — calls this emotional reaction “pre-traumatic stress disorder,” a term she coined to describe the mental anguish that results from preparing for the worst, before it actually happens.
HT: Ryan Maue
Thank You Grist and Zip.

Monday, October 27, 2014

VA Struggles To Separate Fake From Real PTSD, With Virtually NO Patients Improving

Virtually No Patients Improving. Anyone Surprised?

madinamerica;


October 25, 2014
“As disability awards for PTSD have grown nearly fivefold over the past 13 years, so have concerns that many veterans might be exaggerating or lying to win benefits,” reports the Washington Post. The Post quotes studies and experts suggesting that “roughly half” of veterans may not really have PTSD.
“Depending on severity, veterans with PTSD can receive up to $3,000 a month tax-free, making the disorder the biggest contributor to the growth of a disability system in which payments have more than doubled to $49 billion since 2002,” reports the Post.
In addition, the Post notes that virtually no veterans ever seem to be getting better. “Of the 572,612 veterans on the disability rolls for PTSD at the end of 2012, 1,868 — a third of 1 percent — had lower ratings the next year, according to statistics provided by the VA.”

Thursday, June 26, 2014

NO Evidence PTSD Treatments Helping Veterans

And this comes as a surprise to anyone?
madinamerica;


June 22, 2014
No one has been tracking whether or not US veterans have been benefiting in any way from over $3.2 billion annually in mental health treatment programs for post-traumatic stress disorder from the Veterans Administration and Department of Defense, according to a National Academies press release and report from the US Institute of Medicine. An estimated 5 percent of veterans have been diagnosed with PTSD. “Given that the DOD and VA are responsible for serving millions of service members, families, and veterans, we found it surprising (???) that no PTSD outcome measures are used consistently to know if these treatments are working or not,” said committee chair Sandro Galea of Columbia University.
The one small PTSD treatment program that was tracked, the researchers noted, yielded “only modest improvements in symptoms.”
This entry was posted in Corruption & Accountability, Featured News, In the News, PTSD, Research byRob Wipond. Bookmark the permalink.
Thank You MIA and Mr Wipond.

Related Posts:


Saturday, January 11, 2014

Sen Feinstein (D-Hypocrite) Watch - Back Fill - All Vets Are Mentally Ill And Govt. Should Prevent Them From Owning Firearms




March 2013
[Ed; Is This Old News? NOT So Long as she's still in the US Senate it isn't.]
During the Senate Judiciary meeting today to markup a potpourri of bills designed to deny the American people their rights under the Second Amendment and disarm them, Senator Dianne Feinstein opposed an amendment to her so-called assault weapons ban legislation that would allow veterans to continue buying firearms the bill would outlaw.
Feinstein basically said all veterans have PTSD and should have their Second Amendment stripped. In response to the amendment, she said the following:
…this adds an exemption of retired military. As I understand our bill, no issue has arose in this regard during the 10 years the expired ban was effect… and what we did in the other bill was exempt possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States… that included active military. The problem with expanding this is that you know with the advent of PTSD, which I think is a new phenomenon as a product of the Iraq War, it’s not clear how the seller or transferrer of a firearm covered by this bill would verify that an individual was a member, or a veteran, and that there was no impairment of that individual with respect to having a weapon like this. So you know I would be happy to sit down with you again and see if we could work something out but I think we have to — if you’re going to do this, find a way that veterans who are incapacitated for one reason or another mentally don’t have access to this kind of weapon.
The comments are included in the C-Span video below.
Thankfully, Feinstein’s bill will most certainly be dead on arrival and – for now – the American people (with the exception of Americans unfortunate enough to live in New York state) will have their Second Amendment rights spared.
Feinstein’s remark, however, reveals a deep-seated mistrust and contempt for America’s veterans. It also reveals the fear by government of the revolutionary potential of veterans, a fear dutifully expressed by the Department of Homeland Security when it said returning veterans are “right wing extremists” who may challenge the government.
Incidentally, Feinstein is way off the mark. Although PTSD is a relatively new definition, soldiers returning from combat have experienced anxiety disorders since time immemorial. It is nothing new. She is merely exploiting a modern psychology term in order to add substance to her argument that veterans are insane and as such must have their Second Amendment rights nullified.

Sen Feinstein's Police State Agenda: Senate Panel Approves Measure Defining A Journalist


If You were Sen. Feinstein, You'd want an Off Switch on the press too.

One Vet commenting on another site put DiFi's PTSD Bogeyman/Thought Criminal nonsense into proper perspective for All Americans.

"It's not the PTSD that scares her. It's the Oath we took."