Showing posts with label Patient Safety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patient Safety. Show all posts

Monday, January 9, 2017

769 Hospitals Penalized For Patient Safety In 2017

Kaiser Health News




The federal government has cut payments to hospitals with high rates of patient injuries this year. Those hospitals will lose 1 percent of Medicare payments over the federal fiscal year, which runs from October 2016 through next September. Maryland hospitals are exempted from penalties because that state has a separate payment arrangement with Medicare.

Below are the hospitals being penalized:

Full KHN Story: 769 Hospitals Penalized For Patient Safety In 2017
  Download the Year-by-Year Data: CSV| PDF


Saturday, August 23, 2014

Another Black Eye For ObamaCare/CMS: Experts Refute Results of CMS Patient Safety Program

fiercehealthcare;

Partnership for Patients program had weak design, data, methods



Although the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) boasts patient safety improvements through its Partnership for Patients program (PPP), an opinion piece in the New England Journal of Medicine questions whether the initiative actually improved patient care.

The program's weak study design and methods, in addition to a lack of transparency and rigor in evaluation, make it difficult for healthcare organizations to learn from improvement efforts and stifles progress toward a safer, more effective healthcare system, write Peter Pronovost, M.D., Ph.D, senior vice president for patient and safety and quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine and Ashish K. Jha, M.D., M.P.H., professor of health policy and management at the Harvard School of Public Health.

The public-private program was established under the Affordable Care Act in December 2011 as a collaboration of 26 hospital engagement networks (HENs) that represented more than 3,700 hospitals in an effort to reduce hospital-acquired conditions by 40 percent and 30-day readmissions by 20 percent nationwide by the end of 2013.

CMS announced in February that the rates of early elective deliveries dropped by 48 percent among 681 hospitals in 20 networks and the national rate of all-cause readmissions dropped from 19 percent to 17.9 percent. The authors write that the numbers appear impressive, but it's nearly impossible to determine whether the initiative led to better care given the publicly available data and the approach CMS used.

Pronovost and Jha say that the main problems with CMS' evaluation are that it used a pre-post design with only single points in the pre- and post- period and didn't have concurrent controls. The result, they say, is highly subject to bias.

Furthermore, CMS didn't use a standardized and validated performance measures across all participating hospitals, the authors claim. Instead, the agency allowed each HEN to define its own performance measures and didn't focus on data quality control.

It also didn't subject the work to independent evaluation or peer review. Had it done so, Pronovost and Jha write that CMS might have changed its evaluation plan or provided more data.

The PPP required thousands of hours of clinicians' time and large sums of money, making the lack of confidence in the results "particularly unfortunate," they write. "More important, the failure to generate valid, reliable information hampers our ability to improve future interventions, because we are no closer to understanding how to improve care than we were before the PPP. And that is the biggest cost of all."

To learn more:
- read the 
NEJM piece
- read CMS 
blog post

Thank You Ms. MacDonald and Fierce Healthcare.

Related Articles
Bottom-to-top training essential to reducing hospital infections
Multidisciplinary approach drives down C. diff infections, associated deaths
4 awesome infection-prevention videos
C. diff room infection plummets with dedicated disinfecting teams
Hospitals make headway in infection prevention
Teamwork leads to better hospital safety, care quality

Monday, February 24, 2014

Patient Safety Progress 'Excruciatingly Slow' Expert Says, . . .

fiercehealthcare;
Patient Safety Progress 'Excruciatingly Slow' Expert Says, . . .

Hospitals need more incentives to improve care
Patient safety progress is "excruciatingly slow," mainly because hospitals lack incentive to improve care and performance measures often miss the mark, one health expert told Forbes.

Despite improvements in preventable hospital errors due to lower hospital infection rates and a cultural shift from individual to organization-wide responsibility, hospitals lack clear and strong incentives to make patient care safer, Ashish K. Jha, M.D., a professor at the Harvard School of Public Health, told Forbes contributor Leah Binder.

Hospital mortality rates have trivial financial consequences, Jha said, and under the Affordable Care Act, individual pay-for-performance for doctors and nurses doesn't hold entire healthcare systems accountable.

"It's not on the top priority list for CEOs. It's not what keeps CEOs awake at night. And until we get CEOs losing sleep about unsafe care, we're not going to make a big dent in the failures of our healthcare system," Jha told Binder.

Another concern is readmission-based hospital reimbursements, he said.

"Readmissions [are] not a measure of quality, [they are] a surrogate marker for quality," Jha said. Readmissions for medical conditions such as heart attacks and pneumonia often occur because of measures that are not related to hospital care quality, such as how sick the patients are and what kind of social support they have at home.

Jha suggests Medicare use a more long-term approach, such as bundled payments tied to real quality measures over 90 days as opposed to 30 days. Hospitals must have a better understanding of post-acute and longer-term care, and be accountable for long-term patient outcomes, he said. Only then will the healthcare industry see major improvements and positive changes.

To learn more:
- here's the 
article

Related Articles:
5 steps to create a culture of patient safety
Hospitals get 10 more checklists to keep patients safe


Thank You FierceHealthcare and Ms Sullivan.



"Hospitals need more incentives to improve care"


Uhh, yeah, they do, so here's a few for starters.




Us Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 19 Sec. 371 Conspiracy To Defraud The United States: 5 years

Us Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 47 Sec. 1031 Major Fraud Against The United States: 10 years

Us Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 47 Sec. 1035 False Statements: 5 years

Us Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 63 Sec. 1341 Mail Fraud: Frauds and Swindles: 20 years

Us Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 63 Sec. 1347 Health Care Fraud: 10 years

Us Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 63 Sec. 1349 Attempt and Conspiracy

Us Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 95 Sec. 1957 Engaging In Monetary Transactions In Property Derived From Specified Unlawful Activity: over $10,000, 10 years.


Just the Tip of the Hospital Iceberg.