frontpagemag
The post-election demonstrations against Trump are being orchestrated by socialists and Marxists.
November 11, 2016 John Perazzo
Ever since Donald Trump's election victory Tuesday night, the media have been abuzz with stories about massive, sometimes violent, anti-Trump protests breaking out in cities all across the country. We've been told that ordinary Americans everywhere are so frightened and angered by the prospect of a Trump presidency—as opposed to a Hillary Clinton presidency—that they're taking to the streets to express their grave concerns for the future of the country.
In Chicago, for instance, thousands of people held an “emergency protest” outside a Trump hotel, chanting: “No Trump, No KKK, No Fascist USA!”
In New York, some 5,000 people (including the political oracle Lady Gaga) demonstrated outside Trump Tower. “Their concerns,” said CNN, “ranged from policies, such as Trump's proposed plan to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexican border, to the polarizing tenor of his campaign that they say stoked xenophobic fears.”
In Oakland, some of the 7,000+ demonstrators damaged police cars, vandalized businesses, hurled Molotov cocktails and rocks at law-enforcement officers, and started at least 40 separate fires.
And in Los Angeles, more than 1,000 people filled the streets, burned Trump in effigy, and sang John Lennon's Give Peace a Chance. “Several protesters said they feared that family or friends might be deported once Trump takes office,” said CNN.
From reading the various mainstream media accounts of these events, one comes away with the distinct impression that they are grassroots actions that began organically among ordinary, concerned, well-meaning citizens.
But alas, if one were to think that, one would be wrong.
Contrary to media misrepresentations, many of the supposedly spontaneous, organic, anti-Trump protests we have witnessed in cities from coast to coast were in fact carefully planned and orchestrated, in advance, by a pro-Communist organization called the ANSWER Coalition, which draws its name from the acronym for “Act Now to Stop War and End Racism.” ANSWER was established in 2001 by Ramsey Clark’s International Action Center, a group staffed in large part by members of the Marxist-Leninist Workers World Party. In 2002, the libertarian author Stephen Suleyman Schwartz described ANSWER as an “ultra-Stalinist network” whose members served as “active propaganda agents for Serbia, Iraq, and North Korea, as well as Cuba, countries they repeatedly visit and acclaim.”
Since its inception, ANSWER has consistently depicted the United States as a racist, sexist, imperialistic, militaristic nation guilty of unspeakable crimes against humanity—in other words, a wellspring of pure evil. When ANSWER became a leading organizer of the massive post-9/11 demonstrations against the Patriot Act and the U.S. invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, it formed alliances with other likeminded entities such as Not In Our Name (a project of the Revolutionary Communist Party) and United For Peace and Justice (a pro-Castro group devoted to smearing America as a cesspool of bigotry and oppression).
Another key organizer of the current anti-Trump protests is a group called Socialist Alternative, which describes “the global capitalist system” as “the root cause of … poverty, discrimination, war, and environmental destruction.” Explaining that “the dictatorships that existed in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe were [unfortunate] perversions of what socialism is really about,” this organization calls for a happy-faced “democratic socialism where ordinary people will have control over our daily lives.”
And, lo and behold, many components of Socialist Alternative's agenda mesh seamlessly with Hillary Clinton's political priorities. For instance, Socialist Alternative seeks to: (a) “raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, as a step toward a living wage for all”; (b) provide “free [taxpayer-funded] … public education for all from pre-school through college”; (c) create “a publicly funded single-payer [healthcare] system as a step towards fully socialized medicine”; (d) impose absolutely “no budget cuts [on] education and social services”; and (e) legislate “a major increase in taxes on the rich and big business.”
In short, the anti-Trump protests that are currently making headlines are 100% contrived, fake, phony exhibitions of street theater, orchestrated entirely by radicals and revolutionaries whose chief objective is to push America ever farther to the political left. Moreover, they seek to utterly demoralize conservatives into believing that public opposition to their own (conservative) political and social values is growing more powerful, more passionate, and more widespread with each passing day.
The bottom line is this: The leaders and organizers of the anti-Trump protests that are currently making so much noise in cities across America, are faithfully following the blueprint of Hillary Clinton's famous mentor, Saul Alinsky, who urged radical activists to periodically stage loud, defiant, massive protest rallies expressing rage and discontent. Such demonstrations are designed to give onlookers the impression that a mass movement is preparing to shift into high gear, and that its present size is but a fraction of what it eventually will become. A “mass impression,” said Alinsky, can be lasting and intimidating: “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.... The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”
And that is precisely what we are witnessing at the moment.
Tags: Communism, Donald Trump, Marxism, Protest
Thank You Mr Perrazo and FPM.
Soros and Other Far Leftists Instigate Revolution Against Trump
"For What Possible Use Should You Keep Such A Treacherous And Savage Creature?" Marcus Tullius Cicero
Showing posts with label CPUSA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CPUSA. Show all posts
Monday, November 14, 2016
Wednesday, September 21, 2016
CIA Director: "I Voted For The Communist Party Candidate"
No, not Barack Obama.
(CNN) – At his first polygraph test to enter the CIA, the future director had a secret.
John Brennan on Thursday recalled being asked a standard question for a top security clearance at his early CIA lie detector test: Have you ever worked with or for a group that was dedicated to overthrowing the US?
“I froze,” Brennan said during a panel discussion about diversity in the intelligence community at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation’s annual conference. “This was back in 1980, and I thought back to a previous election where I voted, and I voted for the Communist Party candidate,”
Brennan was responding to a question about barriers to recruiting diverse candidates for the intelligence fields, including whether past records of activism could hurt someone applying for a clearance later in life.
The CIA director said the agency’s mission is to protect the values of the Constitution — which include free speech.
Thank You Zip.
We could repost the whole first page today at Zips today, but you'd be better served just going to see it for yourself.
Whole lotta coverage of the race war Obama and his stirred up for political advantage today, too.
And while you're there, with your jaw bouncing off your desk, Hit the Tip Jar.
Help Zip stay up and running.
Can't fix what needs fixing in America without knowing what's broke.
Friday, July 15, 2016
The SEIU Medicaid Scam
Unionistas
daily callerPaige Halper 7/15/2016
Mark Dayton is no quitter.
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton signed S.F. 778 into law in May 2013. The law opened up unionization for thousands of homecare workers who have chosen to care for special-needs family members at home.
Following the passage of S.F. 778, less than 6,000 workers voted for the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) to become the exclusive representative of an estimated 27,000 PCAs. The union signed a contract with the state of Minnesota in May 2015 and now the union takes three percent of each member’s Medicaid subsidy.
It’s this contract and pay system that Dayton used to classify PCAs as government employees, allowing the union to march in under the guise of collective bargaining. The contract asserts, “the State recognizes the union as the exclusive representative under Minnesota Public Employee Labor Relations Act (PERLA).”
But PERLA provides a very specific definition of a public employee — “any person appointed or employed by a public employer.” A public employee, then, would not be hired by a family member or friend in need at home.
The Supreme Court has agreed.
In the 2014 case Harris v. Quinn, eight Illinois home healthcare workers, known as personal assistants (PAs), fought paying agency fees to the SEIU. The agency fees, unlike traditional members’ dues, require non-members to pay the union costs related to collective bargaining.
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton signed S.F. 778 into law in May 2013. The law opened up unionization for thousands of homecare workers who have chosen to care for special-needs family members at home.
Following the passage of S.F. 778, less than 6,000 workers voted for the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) to become the exclusive representative of an estimated 27,000 PCAs. The union signed a contract with the state of Minnesota in May 2015 and now the union takes three percent of each member’s Medicaid subsidy.
It’s this contract and pay system that Dayton used to classify PCAs as government employees, allowing the union to march in under the guise of collective bargaining. The contract asserts, “the State recognizes the union as the exclusive representative under Minnesota Public Employee Labor Relations Act (PERLA).”
But PERLA provides a very specific definition of a public employee — “any person appointed or employed by a public employer.” A public employee, then, would not be hired by a family member or friend in need at home.
The Supreme Court has agreed.
In the 2014 case Harris v. Quinn, eight Illinois home healthcare workers, known as personal assistants (PAs), fought paying agency fees to the SEIU. The agency fees, unlike traditional members’ dues, require non-members to pay the union costs related to collective bargaining.
In the Harris opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that forcing PAs to pay union agency fees was unconstitutional, violating the First Amendment. The Court also labelled PAs as “much different from public employees. Unlike full-fledged public employees, PAs are almost entirely answerable to the customers and not to the State.” Sound familiar?
Nevertheless, the SEIU is collecting three percent of the modest Minnesotan PCA government subsidies.
The SEIU and Dayton have already made attempts at unionization. In November 2011, just two years prior to S.F. 778, Dayton tried to authorize union elections for child-care providers through an executive order.
Keyword: tried.
Ramsey County District Court Judge Dale Lindman struck down Dayton’s order in April 2012. Not only was the order considered a breech of constitutional authority, but the workers definitely didn’t want it: the providers’ votes against unionization were nearly triple that of support.
Back in 2012, Minnesota Representative Kathy Lohmer authored a bill protecting childcare providers’ finances from being sent to unions. Dayton vetoed it three months after it passed in the House. In response, Lohmer released a cautionary statement:
Simply put: the governor could attempt to exert his authority in other ways over the next two years he is in office, and my legislation would have created protections should that happen. Looking ahead, Minnesotans need to send a clear, resounding message that we need to protect our private business owners from a union takeover.
But why has Governor Dayton’s legacy been stained with continued attempts at deducting pay from the already low wages of Minnesota homecare workers?
To benefit his friends at the SEIU, of course.
With two million members nationwide and four affiliates in Minnesota, the SEIU represents a huge range of workers, from food service to custodians. And now, a husband caring for his wife who had a stroke.
The SEIU Minnesota State Council endorsed Dayton’s campaign back in 2010 and spent $13,500 on his political career in just four years. Union officials celebrated S.F. 778 for opening up millions of dollars in payouts by introducing homecare workers to unionization.
Imagine you’re a PCA in Minnesota, caring for your child. Does the SEIU brush their teeth three percent of the time? Does it fill prescriptions and clean the sheets after an accident? Does the union provide 24/7 companionship and care to the one you love?
Then it certainly doesn’t deserve three percent of your money.
Paige Halper is the Athena Worker Freedom Fellow at The Center for Worker Freedom, a special project of Americans for Tax Reform. phalper@atr.org
Tags: Dale Lindman, Kathy Lohmer, Mark Dayton, Paige Halper, SEIU
Nevertheless, the SEIU is collecting three percent of the modest Minnesotan PCA government subsidies.
The SEIU and Dayton have already made attempts at unionization. In November 2011, just two years prior to S.F. 778, Dayton tried to authorize union elections for child-care providers through an executive order.
Keyword: tried.
Ramsey County District Court Judge Dale Lindman struck down Dayton’s order in April 2012. Not only was the order considered a breech of constitutional authority, but the workers definitely didn’t want it: the providers’ votes against unionization were nearly triple that of support.
Back in 2012, Minnesota Representative Kathy Lohmer authored a bill protecting childcare providers’ finances from being sent to unions. Dayton vetoed it three months after it passed in the House. In response, Lohmer released a cautionary statement:
Simply put: the governor could attempt to exert his authority in other ways over the next two years he is in office, and my legislation would have created protections should that happen. Looking ahead, Minnesotans need to send a clear, resounding message that we need to protect our private business owners from a union takeover.
But why has Governor Dayton’s legacy been stained with continued attempts at deducting pay from the already low wages of Minnesota homecare workers?
To benefit his friends at the SEIU, of course.
With two million members nationwide and four affiliates in Minnesota, the SEIU represents a huge range of workers, from food service to custodians. And now, a husband caring for his wife who had a stroke.
The SEIU Minnesota State Council endorsed Dayton’s campaign back in 2010 and spent $13,500 on his political career in just four years. Union officials celebrated S.F. 778 for opening up millions of dollars in payouts by introducing homecare workers to unionization.
Imagine you’re a PCA in Minnesota, caring for your child. Does the SEIU brush their teeth three percent of the time? Does it fill prescriptions and clean the sheets after an accident? Does the union provide 24/7 companionship and care to the one you love?
Then it certainly doesn’t deserve three percent of your money.
Paige Halper is the Athena Worker Freedom Fellow at The Center for Worker Freedom, a special project of Americans for Tax Reform. phalper@atr.org
Tags: Dale Lindman, Kathy Lohmer, Mark Dayton, Paige Halper, SEIU
Thank Ms Halper and DC.
Monday, July 11, 2016
Sacramento & San Francisco, Most Expensive Places To Give Birth
Unionistas
fiercehealthcare
by Ron Shinkman |
Jul 8, 2016 10:06am
Northern California hospitals are among the most expensive in the nation in which to give birth to a child, according to new research by Castlight Health.
The study finds that Sacramento is the most expensive city in the U.S. to deliver a baby by either vaginal delivery or Cesarean section, with San Francisco as number two. They run $15,420 and $15,204 respectively for vaginal deliveries, more than a third higher than Minneapolis, the next most expensive city.
Sutter Health, which is the predominant hospital operator in both the Bay Area and Sacramento, may be the source of some of the price disparit
y. The non-profit chain is well-known for its high prices, and has butted heads with insurers such as Blue Shield of California,which has claimed its charges are about 30 percent higher than other providers.
But such pricing issues are not confined to Northern California. A 2015 study by researchers from the Yale School of Medicine concluded that price variations among hospitals for childbirth vary by as much as 10-fold. In some instances, hospital bills for childbirth can approach nearly $40,000.
“It’s a black box when it comes to pricing in healthcare,” Kristin Torres Mowat, a Castlight senior vice president, told Kaiser Health News. “There's not a rational explanation for this kind of variation for similar procedures in the same geography. It highlights how inefficient the healthcare market is.”
Kaiser Health News has reported that both the high charges of Sutter and Dignity Health--along with aligning with the lion's share of the area's obstetricians may be contributing factors. “The less choice and competition there is, the higher the pricing,” Mowat told the publication.
- read the Castlight Health article
- check out the Kaiser Health News article
Read more on
Healthcare Costs, Sutter Health, Dignity Health
fiercehealthcare
by Ron Shinkman |
Jul 8, 2016 10:06am
Northern California hospitals are among the most expensive in the nation in which to give birth to a child, according to new research by Castlight Health.
The study finds that Sacramento is the most expensive city in the U.S. to deliver a baby by either vaginal delivery or Cesarean section, with San Francisco as number two. They run $15,420 and $15,204 respectively for vaginal deliveries, more than a third higher than Minneapolis, the next most expensive city.
Sutter Health, which is the predominant hospital operator in both the Bay Area and Sacramento, may be the source of some of the price disparit
But such pricing issues are not confined to Northern California. A 2015 study by researchers from the Yale School of Medicine concluded that price variations among hospitals for childbirth vary by as much as 10-fold. In some instances, hospital bills for childbirth can approach nearly $40,000.
“It’s a black box when it comes to pricing in healthcare,” Kristin Torres Mowat, a Castlight senior vice president, told Kaiser Health News. “There's not a rational explanation for this kind of variation for similar procedures in the same geography. It highlights how inefficient the healthcare market is.”
Kaiser Health News has reported that both the high charges of Sutter and Dignity Health--along with aligning with the lion's share of the area's obstetricians may be contributing factors. “The less choice and competition there is, the higher the pricing,” Mowat told the publication.
- read the Castlight Health article
- check out the Kaiser Health News article
Read more on
Healthcare Costs, Sutter Health, Dignity Health
Thank You Mr Shrinkman and FH.
Labels:
California,
CPUSA,
Sacramento,
San Francisco,
SEIU,
Sutter Health
Monday, June 16, 2014
Discover The SEIU: Who Are They?
Since the Service Employees International Union plays such a huge role in Health Care, just Who and What are they?
Thank You Discover The Networks.org.
AND, . . if you think our lead pic was a cheap shot or just a set up one timer: go get more like it and the story behind it.
SEIU Drops Mask, Goes Full Commie.
www.DiscoverTheNetworks.org | Date: 6/16/2014 4:26:39 PM |
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU) | |
1800 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 | Phone :(202) 730-7000 / (800) 424-8592 Email :media@seiu.org URL :http://www.seiu.org/ |
See also: Andrew Stern John Sweeney The earliest roots of SEIU date back to 1921, when seven small janitor unions combined to form the Building Service Employees International Union (BSEIU), whose members were mostly immigrant workers. Over time, BSEIU began to organize other types of service workers as well, including doormen, elevator operators, nonacademic school employees, healthcare workers, public employees, and people employed in such venues as bowling alleys, stadiums, and cemeteries. In 1968, BSEIU changed its nameto the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). With 2.2 million members across the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico, SEIU is today the fastest-growing union in North America. Representing both public- and private-sector employees, its mission is "to improv[e] the lives of workers and their families and creat[e] a more just and humane society,” particularly for “people of color,” who make up 40 percent of the union's membership. In its quest to recruit new members, SEIU aggressively pursues unskilled, low-wage service workers, who constitute the vast majority of its members. By and large, most SEIU members work in three key service sectors:
Moreover, SEIU parlayed MfM into aggressive "corporate campaigns" -- coordinated assaults, often conducted in alliance with social and religious activist groups, against the reputations of companies resistant to unionization. Such campaigns typically feature boycotts, picket lines, public demonstrations, literature distribution, letter-writing, and negative-publicity initiatives in the media. Corporate campaigns of this sort originated in the 1960s with "New Left" organizations like the Students for a Democratic Society. SEIU would continue to employ tough, even violent, tactics long after John Sweeney's departure in 1995. In April 2009, California Nurses Association executive director Rose Ann DeMoro condemned the union's "ugly pattern ... of physical abuse and tactics of intimidation that have no place in either our labor movement or a civilized society." outside the private home of a company official to embarrass and intimidate his or her entire family, or By the end of Sweeney's tenure as SEIU president, the union hierarchy was thoroughly saturated not only with his penchant for ruthlessness but also with his far-left politics. Indeed, as the socialist New Party was becoming established in the mid-1990s, the national newsletter of the Democratic Socialists of America characterized the young organization as essentially the “electoral arm” of ACORN and its allied SEIU locals. Sweeney was succeeded as SEIU president by the former New Leftist Andrew Stern, who filled the post from 1996-2010. Under Stern’s leadership, the union's membership grew by more than 1.2 million. Designated as a “527 organization,” SEIU in 2003 became a national partner in the America Votes (AV) coalition. AV, in turn, belongs to the so-called Shadow Democratic Party, a nationwide network of leftwing unions, activist groups, and think tanks engaged in supporting the Democrats. To view SEIU's fellow partners in America Votes, click here. In November 2003, SEIU dispatched thousands of volunteers to work on the presidential campaign of Howard Dean. After Dean dropped out of the race in early 2004, Andrew Stern played a major role in persuading the Democratic nominee, John Kerry, to select John Edwards as his running mate. By June 2004, SEIU had already committed $65 million to voter-registration, voter-education, and voter-mobilization initiatives on behalf of the Kerry-Edwards campaign. Moreover, the union pledged to assign 50,000 of its members as get-out-the-vote “volunteers” just prior to, and on, election day. In September 2005, SEIU and six other unions -- the Teamsters, UNITE HERE, the United Food and Commercial Workers, the Laborers, the Carpenters, and the United Farm Workers -- broke away from the AFL-CIO and formed the Change to Winfederation. In 2006, George Soros's Open Society Institute awarded a $100,000 grant to SEIU. Also in 2006, during the administration of Democratic Governor Jennifer Granholm, SEIU Healthcare Michigan (a Michigan branch of the SEIU) lobbied successfully for a rule that classified unpaid family members caring for their sick or disabled relatives as “home health care workers” – and classified the healthcare recipients as “employers.” This arrangement forced the caregivers to join the SEIU and pay union dues, which were collected automatically from the care recipients' Medicare or Medicaid checks. Between 2006 and 2013, SEIU Healthcare Michigan reaped nearly $35 million in this manner from the state's elderly, sick, and disabled. After the measure was abolished in 2013 by Republicans (including Gov. Rick Snyder, who was elected in 2012), more than 44,000 of SEIU Healthcare Michigan's 59,000 home-based healthcare workers voluntarily and eagerly parted ways with the union. In 2008, SEIU spent approximately $60.7 million to help elect Barack Obama to the White House, deploying some 100,000 pro-Obama campaign volunteers who "knocked on 1.87 million doors, made 4.4 million phone calls … and sent more than 2.5 million pieces of mail in support of Obama." During his campaign, Obama told an SEIU audience: “Your agenda has been my agenda in the United States Senate.... Just imagine what we could do together...Imagine having a president whose life’s work was your work...” After Obama's election, the SEIU became an enormously influential force in his administration: and to SEIU.
A noteworthy affiliate of SEIU is its powerful and militant, New York City-based Local 1199, which has more than 300,000 members and is the world’s largest union local. Sixteen years after its 1932 founding, 1199 was investigated by the House Un-American Activities Committee on suspicion of Communist "infiltration." When the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) split in 1991, several officials of Local 1199 took many comrades with them into the breakaway group, the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism. One of those officials, Rafael Pizarro, also went on to help establish the New Party, a socialist organization that Barack Obama would join in 1995. At a March 2007 meeting, 1199's executive vice president Steve Kramer spoke enthusiastically about the role which CPUSA had played in building up his union. SEIU has extensive ties to the community organization ACORN:
Between 1989 and 2010, SEIU gave $29,140,232 to political parties and campaigns. Of that total, 95 percent went to Democrats and 3 percent went to Republicans. For a list of these recipients, click here. Mary Kay Henry, who has worked with SEIU since 1979, succeeded Andrew Stern as SEIU president in 2010. She is a founding member of SEIU's gay and lesbian Lavender Caucus, whose purpose is "to facilitate open and respectful communication between the L/G/B/T community and the labor movement." She is also a member of the executive board of Families USA. In February 2011, SEIU took part in a “Rally to Save the American Dream” (RSAD), which was organized as an expression of solidarity with Wisconsin public-sector union employees. For a list of other key participants in the RSAD rally, click here. SEIU sponsored a May Day 2011 rally in Los Angeles, where many participants displayed banners openly advocating communism. Also in 2011, SEIU sponsored the national conference of Netroots Nation. To view a list of other notable organizations that have sponsored NN conferences, click here. In 2012, SEIU campaigned aggressively in an effort to help President Barack Obama win reelection over Republican challenger Mitt Romney. In October of that year, for instance, the union bussed protesters to the site of a pro-Romney rally in the key swing state of Ohio and paid them $11.00-per-hour to carry anti-Romney placards and chant slogans like “Romney go home!” and “We don’t need no bad economy.” SEIU has had many affiliations, past and present, with prominent leftist organizations and coalitions. For example:
|
Thank You Discover The Networks.org.
AND, . . if you think our lead pic was a cheap shot or just a set up one timer: go get more like it and the story behind it.
SEIU Drops Mask, Goes Full Commie.
Labels:
Change Agents,
Communism,
CPUSA,
Obamanation,
SEIU,
Unions
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)