Showing posts with label Deposition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deposition. Show all posts

Friday, September 21, 2012

Judge Lets Gorsky Off The Hook In Risperdal Case

FiercePharma has;
Judge Lets Gorsky Off The Hook In Risperdal Case
CEO will not have to face a jury in case where 17-year-old boy allegedly grew breasts after taking Risperdal

September 21, 2012 | By Eric Palmer


Johnson & Johnson ($JNJ) CEO Alex Gorsky has again dodged a bullet and will not be forced to testify in front of a jury in the somewhat sensational Risperdal case in which a teenage boy allegedly grew breasts after taking the antipsychotic drug.

Gorsky has already given a deposition in the case. The judge overseeing it waited to the end to make his decision, since the trial is set to begin Monday.

J&J lawyers argued that Gorsky was too far up the food chain to have firsthand knowledge of the events. But the Philadelphia Inquirer reports that defense attorneys have a memo in which he approved a $500,000 payment to a doctor in 2002 to begin a program at Massachusetts General Hospital with the aim of upping the use of Risperdal for children even though it was approved for adults only at the time.

In an earlier case brought by the same plaintiff's lawyers, and alleging a similar side effect of the drug, J&J settled just before the case went to trial. The settlement also came before the judge decided whether the CEO would have to face a jury and explain why the company was pushing the drug on children when it wasn't approved for that use. Still, with hundreds of individual suits still out to be tried or settled, there may be many more shots at Gorsky.


Thank You FiercePharma and Mr Palmer


The fact that this Risperdal fiasco has gone on This long speaks volumes of the endless Conflicts of Interest plaguing our Government. 




Mr Gorsky owes the World an explanation of his previous hair splitting between a J&J In House Off-Label Marketing plan to sell this drug to children years before acquiring FDA approval to Market it to children, and an Off the Premises mutation of his Ideations RE: a Selling plan, to Market or not Market this drug to the prescribers who poisoned children with it.

http://psychroaches.blogspot.com/2012/09/deposed-prolactin-gynecomastia-gorksy.html

And while Mr. Gorsky may continue to dance his way around the stand for some time yet, others, in this conflicted mess, will have the Voters to answer to in just a few weeks.



Breitbart.com

ISSA: OBAMA ENEMIES LIST: NIXONIAN
 20 Sep 2012


Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), chair of the House Oversight Committee, has come out firing today after reports about collusion between the Department of Justice and far-left propaganda machine Media Matters for America. The reports showed that DOJ officials and Media Matters were trading information about particular conservatives, including Breitbart News editor Joel Pollak. “Not since Richard Nixon have we seen a president who puts together an enemies list and has a whole team pursuing it,” said Issa today. “That’s what’s happened in this administration. It’s sad. It’s not the America I want to see going forward. I sincerely hope that after the election, regardless, the American people will have made a statement that they won’t tolerate this.”

Issa also suggested that Congress look at whether Media Matters be able to keep its nonpartisan tax exempt status under current law. Furthermore, said Issa, DOJ Office of Public Affairs Director Trace Schmaler, who worked with Media Matters, should be fired. “These people represent the culture that President Obama brought in to Washington,” he said. “A culture of division; a culture that embraces the concept that the 1 percent is evil and somehow the rest of America somehow needs to punish the 1 percent.”

Thank You Breitbart and Mr Shapiro

Thursday, September 20, 2012

DEPOSED: Risperdal, Prolactin & Gynecomastia: The Gorksy Transcript Pt III

IF you haven't availed yourself of J&J CEO Alex "Risperdal" Gorsky's deposition yet, what's keeping you?

A 15 year old boy was poisoned with Risperdal, grew male breasts from it, and later had to have them surgically removed. 
Here's the transcript.
'Mental Health' at its, well, ...... butt covering non-disclosing to the consumer, usual self.
Let's start with a J&J Ideation or two of how J&J views the definition of "Off Label Marketing"
Deposition: starting on pg 158 (pg 41 of the pdf)
We're finding the hair splitting here between Marketing Plans and Selling Plans for the pediatric market (in 2001/2002 pre FDA pediatric approval) fascinating.
“11 Q. Turn to the top of the next page, please, page
12 261. See where it says “RISPERDAL use in the
13 child/adolescent population is exploding”? Is that
14 correct?
15 A. That’s what it says, yes.
16 Q. Then down below it says, “Key Base Business
17 Goals — well, strike that. I’m sorry.
18 “RISPERDAL use in the child/adolescent
19 population is exploding,” but in this time frame,
20 2001/2002, Risperdal is not indicated by the FDA for
21 any pediatric use, is it?
22 A. Again, we did not have the specific
23 indication, as we discussed earlier, until 2006. I
24 don’t remember exactly what the labeling said regarding
Page 158
1 use in children, but as I discussed earlier, there was
2 a significant — there appeared to be a significant
3 increase in the recognition of this condition in
4 children and adolescents during this time, which was
5 substantiated by data and its occurrence.
6 And physicians have an opportunity to use a
7 treatment that they perceive to be appropriate and
8 effective in a particular patient population, and
9 that’s clearly what we were seeing happening in this
10 area.
11 Q. Look down at the heading that says “Key Base
12 Business Goals and Objectives.” Do you see that?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. And the fifth of the Key Base Business Goals
15 says “Grow and protect share in child/adolescents.” Is
16 that right?
17 A. Yes, that’s correct.
18 Q. My question is, how can Johnson & Johnson grow
19 a share in a child and adolescent market when the drug
20 isn’t even indicated for use in the child and
21 adolescent market?

22 A. Well, my interpretation of that is, this is in
23 fact a marketing plan, (1) not a selling plan. As a
24 marketing plan, its intent is to cover a wide range of
1 activities regarding the development as well as the
2 promotion of Risperdal.



3 That being said, all of our actual promotion
4 to the physicians would follow what was outlined in our
5 package insert and all of our materials went through a
6 significant review process, and that’s the way our
7 representatives were trained. And in an area such as
8 this, this is a marketer versus a sales representative,
9 their language.
10 And when in fact physicians took it upon
11 themselves and their patients to prescribe the product,
12 their statement would in fact be correct: To ensure
13 that when a physician made that choice, that it was in
14 fact Risperdal.
15 Q. You were the vice-president of sales and
16 marketing at this time frame, 2000/2001, correct?

And according to now CEO, and then VP of Marketing and Selling Gorsky, there's a Difference between Marketing plans and Selling plans. Apparently it's only illegal if it leaves the J&J premises themselves as Marketing rather than Selling, but In House Off Label Marketing is a different Ideation.

UPDATES:
March 20, 2014
Arkansas Supreme Court Reverses Billion Dollar Risperdal Case

June 1st, 2015
Janssen To Pay $7.5 Million In Risperdal Settlement


Back to the deposition:
On pg 21 of the pdf:
8 Q. And then one of the safety areas that’s
9 discussed there is prolactin. Is that right?
10 A. It says, “Safety areas include prolactin (in
11 publication), cardiovascular” and a number of other
12 items.
pg 38
18 Q. The date is May 17th, 2002 in the top
19 left-hand corner?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. If we turn to page two at the topline results
22 summary, it has two numbers there I want to talk about.
23 The first one in the second paragraph: What was the
24 rate of EPS-related adverse events and risperidone, if
1 you can find that for me?
2 A. It was noted as 47.8 percent.
3 Q. And what was it for haloperidol?
4 A. 57.8 percent.
5 Q. And then next under that they say there was a
6 statistically significant difference between the
7 treatment groups and the number of patients with
8 prolactin-related adverse events, too. Is that
9 correct?
10 A. That’s correct.
11 Q. And what was the percentage of
12 prolactin-related adverse events for Risperdal?
13 A. It says five percent.
14 Q. And what was it for haloperidol?
15 A. 0.4 percent.
16 Q. So, let’s turn back to page 8779, please. Do
17 you see in the middle there 3.1.3, it has
18 “Prolactin-related adverse events”?
19 A. Yes, I do.
20 Q. And then it has the same percentages down
21 there in the third or fourth row, the total number of
22 patients with prolactin-related AEs? It has five
23 percent for risperidone and 0.4 for Haloperidol?
24 A. Yes, it does.
Page 148
1 Q. And that’s fourteen patients out of 278 had
2 prolactin-related adverse events in this clinical
3 trial. Is that right?
4 A. That’s correct.
11 Q. And what was the percentage of
12 prolactin-related adverse events for Risperdal?
13 A. It says five percent.
14 Q. And what was it for haloperidol?
15 A. 0.4 percent.

Prolactin/Gynecomastia, a 12.5 fold Increase over Haldol.
And as we All know, Haldol, Another J&J Wonder Drug, is Also a Dr. Paul Janssen developed product.

Atypical Trials Rigged: Haldol, Risperdal, Tardive Dyskinesia & SFDPH, Again