Joe Biden: Trump Can't Be Trusted With The Nuclear Launch Codes, Then POINTS Out The Guy With Him Who HAS The Codes

Biden's sole purpose in being VP has been, from the start, to be Obama's Fail Safe Insurance Policy against Impeachment.

So, you want to trust Hillary with those launch codes?

She's the one who approved Joe Biden to convince the voters that she Does possess the judgment skills to be trusted with those launch codes.

The Torture Never Stops: Micro Chipped Pills

GreenMed Info has;

Microchip Laden Drugs Given FDA Approval

Post date: 

Friday, August 3rd 2012 at 1:00 pm

Written by: 

Sayer Ji, founder

Rumors regarding the development of a 'digital pill' with a microchip inside have been circulating for some time, but today, the FDA actually green lighted the product.
The company, Proteus Digital Health, gained FDA approval for its 1 square millimeter device (the size of a grain of sand), which it believes will "shift the care paradigm" into an era of digital medicine.
According to Proteus Digital Health's website:

Digital Medicines are the same pharmaceuticals you take today, with one small change: each pill also contains a tiny sensor that can communicate, via our digital health feedback system, vital information about your medication-taking behaviors and how your body is responding.

The company added "As a result, you can be sure you're taking your medicines as prescribed, while at the same time receiving unprecedented feedback on your physical response to treatment."
The aim of the "ingestible sensor" is to electronically verify patient compliance in taking the medication.  Proteus Digital Health estimates that over 50% of patients do not get the full benefit from the pharmaceuticals they take because of taking the wrong dose or taking the medication inconsistently.
There are huge sums of money at stake in getting people to take their drugs as prescribed. In a 2008 article published in the drug industry marketing journal Pharma Marketing News titled "Moving The Needle on Adherence: Highlights from the 7th Annual Patient Compliance, Adherence and Persistency," ‎it was estimated that an 18% improvement in compliance would translate into increased revenues of approximately $8000 per patient a year.
Here is how the technology intends to work:

The Proteus ingestible sensor can be integrated into an inert pill or other ingested products, such as pharmaceuticals. Once the ingestible sensor reaches the stomach, it is powered by contact with stomach fluid and communicates a unique signal that determines identity and timing of ingestion. This information is transferred through the user's body tissue to a patch worn on the skin that detects the signal and marks the precise time an ingestible sensor has been taken. Additional physiologic and behavioral metrics collected by the patch include heart rate, body position and activity. The patch relays information to a mobile phone application. With the patient's consent, the information is accessible by caregivers and clinicians, helping individuals to develop and sustain healthy habits, families to make better health choices, and clinicians to provide more effective, data-driven care.

What are the unintended, adverse health effects of this technology? Has it been sufficiently safety-tested? These are questions that remain largely unanswered, but have already been raised in connection with other proposed RFID technologies intended to be implanted within the human body.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which has recently come under criticism for their financial support of GMO agriculture, 'edible' and 'flying' vaccines, pesticide-laden traditional scarves, and other questionable technological interventions ostensibly to reduce suffering, are also prominently figured partners on the Proteus Digital Health website.
The European Union was the first to approve Proteus' system device in 2010, indicating the market for the technology is global.

Sayer Ji is the founder and director of GreenMedInfo.com and co-author of the bookThe Cancer Killers: The Cause Is The Cure with New York Times best-seller Dr. Ben Lerner and Dr. Charles Majors. His writings and research have been published in the Wellbeing Journal, the Journal of Gluten Sensitivity, and have been featured on Mercola.com, NaturalNews.com, Reuters.com, GaryNull.com, Infowars.com and Care2.com.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

Thank You Mr Sayer Ji.

Do we Have to snark this latest from FDA for you?

Or isn't the built in potential/pre-planning for yet another enormous brick on the road to hell being dropped here immediately apparent to Everyone? Scanners integrated into mall security systems? Scanners integrated into public building metal detectors? "Step over here for a minute Miss, It appears you haven't taken your Political Health/Mind and Mood Control Pill Today."

Hospitals Report Only 1% Of Patient Harm Events

FierceHealthcare has;
Hospitals Report Only 1% Of Patient Harm Events
July 20, 2012 | By Alicia Caramenico

Although about 60 percent of patient harm events occurred at hospitals in states with reporting systems, only 12 percent of the events met state requirements for reporting, according to new report from the Office of the Inspector General released today that looked at Medicare beneficiaries discharged in October 2008.


What's more, hospitals reported only 1 percent of the adverse and temporary harm events. Many of the unreported events that require reporting under state regulations, involve serious harm, including six patient deaths, the OIG noted in a spotlight.


However, the OIG acknowledges that low levels of reporting to state systems likely stem from hospital staff not knowing that patient-safety incidents are reportable events, not hospitals failing to report known events.


In light of previous OIG reports, hospitals are changing systems to reduce the likelihood of human error and implementing processes that are proven to provide better care with less risk of harm, Ruth Ann Dorrill, deputy regional inspector general for the Office of Evaluation and Inspections, said a podcast.
For example, using hospital checklists can help providers reduce infection rates, save money and cut the risk of death for surgical patients practically in half.


Another threat to patient safety is that most health professionals are afraid to report errors, worried that their mistakes and event reports will be held against them.


However, the OIG findings could raise the financial stakes to improve adverse event reporting systems. Patient harm events for one month alone cost the Medicare program $324 million, according to the report.


To learn more:
- read the report summary and spotlight
- listen to the OIG podcast
Related Articles:
ID re-entry helps reduce wrong-patient errors
Wake up your zombie workforce to patient safety risks
How to apologize for adverse events
Hospital staff afraid to speak up about medical errors
Hospital workers don't report 86% of patient harm events

Thank You Very Much Fierce Healthcare and Ms Caramenico


Ya Know, ...... you can't Buy stuff like this, and the beauty of it is you don't Have to because Ms Caramenico and her co-workers will deliver Reports like this FREE, No Strings Attached, Nothing to Buy right to your E-Mail Box daily just for your signing up.