Friday, April 7, 2017

Withdrawal From Mood Stabilizers

madinamerica
by Emily Wheeler

Editor’s note: We know that our reviews of the withdrawal literature are incomplete, and we urge readers to help us add to them. Please send study citations that are relevant to the withdrawal literature for mood stabilizers to rwhitaker@madinamerica.com.
Introduction
The class of drugs known as “mood stabilizers” is a disparate group of medications with different theorized mechanisms of action and effects. The classification of mood stabilizer is itself contested, with no standardized definition. This document will review the drugs lithium and the “antiepileptic” or “anticonvulsant” medications carbamazepine, lamotrigine, and valproate/divalproex/sodium valproate. As the longest prescribed drug in the class, lithium is the most thoroughly researched, although areas of needed research exist across this class of drugs as a whole. 
Mechanism of Action
Various theories of the mechanisms of action of lithium and other mood stabilizers have been proposed, but no prevailing or unifying theory has been established. Thus is it unknown how the neurochemical effects of these drugs result in any therapeutic effects, nor how their withdrawal might affect users.
1) Balon R, Yeragani VK, Pohl RB, Gershon S. Lithium discontinuation: withdrawal or relapse? Compr Psychiatry 1988;29:330-4. PubMed link
 Balon et al. review animal and human studies of lithium discontinuation, including the possible pathophysiological explanation for rebound phenomena. The authors conclude that the research is mixed, and that no research has specifically addressed the neurochemical basis of withdrawal from lithium.                                                    
2) Williams R, Cheng L, Mudge A, Harwood A. A common mechanism of action for three mood-stabilizing drugs. Nature 2002;417(6886):292-295. PubMed link
 In this article, the authors propose that a common mechanism of action in which lithium, carbamazepine, and valproic acid “inhibit the collapse of sensory neuron growth cones and increase growth cone area.”
3) Harwood A, Agam G. Search for a common mechanism of mood stabilizers. Biochem Pharmacol 2003;66(2):179-189. PubMed link 
Authors review the search for a common mechanism of action among mood stabilizers, as a means of understanding their therapeutic effects and justification for being a unified class of drugs. While reviewing some possibilities, the authors conclude that no common mechanism has been established, nor theory of common action.
4) Post R. Kindling and sensitization as models for affective episode recurrence, cyclicity, and tolerance phenomena. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007;31(6):858-873. PubMed link
In this article, Post outlines his kindling hypothesis of treatment of bipolar disorder, including the hypothesis and supporting research that discontinuation of lithium treatment can lead to a refractory period. In the refractory period, Post proposes that outcomes may be worse than before the introduction of treatment and that reintroduction may not achieve the same effects, although this phenomenon only occurs in 10-15% of patients.
5) Moncrieff J. The Myth of the Chemical Cure: A Critique of Psychiatric Drug Treatment. 2009; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Publisher link
Moncrieff’s critical text on psychiatric drugs includes two chapters on drugs used to treat bipolar disorder. Moncrieff discusses the lack of consensus on a biological theory or animal model of bipolar disorder that would explain or justify the effects of mood stabilizers. She proposes that theoretically the withdrawal effects of lithium could be accounted for by a rebound from its toxic effects, resulting in excitability of the nervous system. She also reviews research on effectiveness of lithium and other mood stabilizers.
6) Schloesser RJ, Martinowich K, Maji HK. Mood stabilizing drugs: mechanisms of action. Trends Neurosci 2012;35:36-46. PubMed link
The authors discuss recent research on the effect of mood stabilizing drugs and that, “at least some of the therapeutic effects of mood-stabilizing drugs appear to be induced by activating neurotrophic and neuroprotective pathways, and related intracellular signaling pathways.” The reason for their therapeutic effects, or how to identify more effective drugs, are unknown.
7) Malhi GS, Tanious M, Das P, Coulston CM, Berk M. Potential mechanisms of action of lithium in bipolar disorder. CNS Drugs 2013;27:135-153. PubMed link
The authors review research on the various theories of mechanisms of action of lithium from microscopic to macroscopic levels, including that lithium affects enzymes involved in second messenger systems that then modulate neurotransmission, resulting in generally inhibitory effects, and that lithium may also be neuroprotective. However, it is unknown why or how lithium’s varied neurochemical effects are implicated in the treatment of mania and depression.
Animal Studies
Animal studies have attempted to explain treatment efficacy of mood stabilizers, as well as account for any “rebound” effects of withdrawal from these drugs. In many cases, withdrawal rat studies suggest that some effects of these medications are reversible whereas others persist after discontinuation.
8) Ahluwalia P, Singhal R. Effect of low-dose lithium administration and subsequent withdrawal on biogenic amines in rat brain. Br J Pharmacol 1980;71(2):601-607. PubMed link
The authors found that lithium administration and withdrawal affected levels of tyrosine, tryptophan, noradrenaline, dopamine, 3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic, and 5-Hydroxytryptamine. Effects varied across different brain regions. Two days of withdrawal of lithium did not result in a straightforward return to baseline levels. 
9) Ahluwalia P, Singhal R. Monoamine uptake into synaptosomes from various regions of rat brain following lithium administration and withdrawal. Neuropharmacology 1981;20(5):483-487. PubMed link
The authors examined noradrenaline, dopamine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) uptake across different brain regions during lithium administration and 2 days of withdrawal. Lithium administration resulted in variable effects on uptake across different regions; withdrawal resulted in return to control levels in all regions except the dopamine and 5-HT uptake in the striatum and 5-HT uptake in the midbrain. The authors propose that “rebound” mania following lithium withdrawal may be a result of this persistent effect on monoamine uptake.
10) Ahluwalia P, Singhal R. Effect of lithium treatment and withdrawal on uptake of noradrenaline into rat brain synaptosomes: a kinetic study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1982;6(4-6):339-342. PubMed link
The authors report on a rebound phenomenon related to noradrenaline uptake following lithium withdrawal. In control animals, two different uptake mechanisms for noradrenaline were found, one low-capacity mechanism and one high-capacity mechanism. Following withdrawal of lithium, uptake returned to control levels in the low-capacity mechanism but further increased uptake in the high-capacity mechanism. The authors posit that the noradrenaline uptake increase seen in the high-capacity mechanism may help explain “rebound” mania seen after lithium withdrawal.
11) Christensen S, Hansen B, Faarup P. Functional and structural changes in the rat kidney by long-term lithium treatment. Ren Physiol 1982;5(2):95-104. PubMed link
The authors observed renal concentrating ability is impaired during long-term (21 week) administration of lithium in rats and that these effects were completely reversed upon drug withdrawal, despite reports that impairment can persist in humans. 
12) Ahluwalia P, Singhal R. Comparison of the changes in central catecholamine systems following short- and long-term lithium treatment and the consequences of lithium withdrawal. Neuropsychobiology 1984;12(4):217-223. PubMed link
This study provides support that withdrawal of lithium, in this case following either short-term or long-term treatment, does not lead to a return to normal states in central catecholamine systems in the rat brain.
13) Lerer B, Globus M, Brik E, Hamburger R, Belmaker R. Effect of treatment and withdrawal from chronic lithium in rats on stimulant-induced responses. Neuropsychobiology 1984;11(1):28-32. PubMed link
The authors found inhibition of hyperactivity induced by a lower dose of stimulants but not by a higher dose during administration of lithium. After withdrawal from lithium, rats showed a subsensitivity to this hyperactivity response; the authors theorize a relationship between this subsensitivity and reports of psychotic symptoms in humans following withdrawal.
14) Ahluwalia P, Singhal R. Kinetics of the uptake of monoamines into synaptosomes from rat brain. Consequences of lithium treatment and withdrawal. Neuropharmacology 1985;24(8):713-720. PubMed link
Results of this study suggest increased uptake of dopamine during lithium treatment across observed brain regions, whereas withdrawal resulted in decreased uptake below control levels.
15) Berggren U. The effect of chronic lithium administration and withdrawal on locomotor activity and apomorphine-induced locomotor stimulation in rats. J Neur Transm 1988;71(1):65-72. PubMed link
Berggren observed no change in in apomorphine-induced locomotor stimulation in rats following administration of lithium, but reported an increase in stimulation following withdrawal. This effect was short-term, with no difference found 4 days after withdrawal, suggesting a temporary increased sensitivity of dopamine receptors.
16) Barros H, Tannhauser S, Tannhauser M, Tannhauser M. Effect of sodium valproate on the open-field behavior of rats. Braz J Med Biol Res 1992;25(3):281-287. PubMed link
Rats were observed for 14 days following interruption of sodium valproate treatment, with no changes in behavior observed.
17) Carli M, Morissette M, Hébert C, Di Paolo T, Reader T. Effects of a chronic lithium treatment on central dopamine neurotransporters. Biochem Pharmacol 1997;54(3):391-397. PubMed link
The authors found some effects of lithium on dopamine systems, supporting the role of dopamine in affective disorders, but did not find any prolonged effects following 48 hours of lithium withdrawal.
18) Miki M, Hamamura T, Kuroda S, et al. Effects of subchronic lithium chloride treatment on G-protein subunits (Golf, Ggamma7) and adenylyl cyclase expressed specifically in the rat striatum. Eur J Pharmacol 2001;428(3):303-309. PubMed link 
The authors found an increase in G-protein after 2 weeks of lithium administration, and that levels did not return to baseline levels until 1 week after withdrawal. The authors discuss the possible relationship between these results and “rebound” mania phenomena after lithium withdrawal. 
19) Sattin A, Senanayake S, Pekary A. Lithium modulates expression of TRH receptors and TRH-related peptides in rat brain. Neuroscience 2002;115(1):263-273. PubMed Link
The authors report the observed effects of acute and chronic lithium administration and its withdrawal on Thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptors and TRH-related peptides. Lithium administration resulted in varied effects (both increases and decreases) in different brain regions, and opposite effects in the 48-hours of observed withdrawal. Observed withdrawal effects were not equivalent to a return to baseline levels.
20) Pekary A, Sattin A, Meyerhoff J, Chilingar M. Valproate modulates TRH receptor, TRH and TRH-like peptide levels in rat brain. Peptides 2004;25(4):647-658. PubMed link
The authors report on the effects of valproate on TRH levels, finding that TRH levels increased with valproate administration and persisted after two days of withdrawal from treatment. The authors discuss these results in light of theories of this drug’s mood regulating potential.
21) Ferrie L, Young A, McQuade R. Effect of chronic lithium and withdrawal from chronic lithium on presynaptic dopamine function in the rat. J Psychopharmacol 2005;19(3):229-234. PubMed link
The authors found in this study that lithium administration decreased presynaptic dopamine release in rats and that dopamine release levels returned to normal once lithium was withdrawn. The authors conclude that lithium’s effects on dopamine release are not related to rebound mania phenomena.
22) Ferrie L, Young A, McQuade R. Effect of lithium and lithium withdrawal on potassium-evoked dopamine release and tyrosine hydroxylase expression in the rat. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2006;9(6):729-735. PubMed link
The authors found that lithium treatment attenuated release of dopamine in treated rats and that this effect persisted 3 days after withdrawal of lithium. Thus, these results do not suggest a “rebound” effect of withdrawal on dopamine release, as has been theorized due to recurrent mania in humans. 
Withdrawal Symptoms
The main concern in withdrawal of mood stabilizing drugs is potential “relapse,” principally in the form of manic episodes.  Research related to relapse is discussed in the “Discontinuation Success Rate” section below, although some researchers have suggested that the experience of mania after withdrawal from mood stabilizers is a withdrawal reaction rather than relapse. Reports of other withdrawal symptoms are mixed, from no effects to more typical drug- withdrawal symptoms such as anxiety and irritability to kidney-related effects related to lithiumwithdrawal. Some research suggests that mood stabilizers are protective against suicidality, such that withdrawal may increase this risk.
23) Rifkin A, Quitkin F, Howard A, Klein D. A study of abrupt lithium withdrawal. Psychopharmacologia 1975;44(2):157-158. PubMed link
Twelve participants were prescribed lithium for 6 weeks and then abruptly withdrawn to placebo. The authors compared reported side effects in the last week of lithium and the first week on placebo. Reported symptoms were similar, leading the authors to conclude that lithium does not produce withdrawal effects.
24) Rabin E, Garston R, Weir R, Posen G. Persistent nephrogenic diabetes insipidus associated with long-term lithium carbonate treatment. Can Med Assoc J 1979;121(2):194-198. PubMed link
This case report describes persistent urine concentration ability of the kidneys of a woman for 4 years following discontinuation of lithium. The authors conclude that the persistent renal effects were likely related to lithium administration.
25) Christodoulou G N, Lykouras E P. Abrupt lithium discontinuation in manic-depressive patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1982:65:310-314. PubMed link
Eighteen patients were discontinued from lithium and followed for 15 days. The authors found reduced side effects and no withdrawal symptoms in their sample, although 3 individuals relapsed within the first four days of discontinuation.
26) King JR, Hullin RP. Withdrawal symptoms from lithium: four case reports and a questionnaire study. Br J Psychiatry 1983;143:30-5. PubMed link
This questionnaire study surveyed lithium users about withdrawal symptoms. Users reported short-term anxiety as a symptom, as well as longer-term effects such as increased emotional responsiveness, improved concentration, and decreased thirst.
27) Bendz H. Kidney function in a selected lithium population. A prospective, controlled, lithium-withdrawal study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1985;72(5):451-463. PubMed link
By studying withdrawal effect, the author found that long-term use of lithium effects kidney functioning in both reversible and irreversible ways.
28) Goodnick P. Clinical and laboratory effects of discontinuation of lithium prophylaxis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1985;71(6):608-614. PubMed link
Twelve patients who had been taking lithium for at least a year and were in remission discontinued lithium for three weeks and completed weekly rating scales regarding mood symptoms and side effects. No significant changes in mood symptoms or relapses were found. Side effects decreased after two weeks of discontinuation, particularly renal functioning improvement.
29) Balon R, Yeragani VK, Pohl RB, Gershon S. Lithium discontinuation: withdrawal or relapse? Compr Psychiatry 1988;29:330-4. PubMed link 
The authors conclude that little evidence documents “true” withdrawal (i.e., symptoms not attributable to relapse) but that its existence is probable, with symptoms of anxiety, irritability, and disturbed sleep.
30) Duncan J, Shorvon S, Trimble M. Withdrawal symptoms from phenytoin, carbamazepine and sodium valproate. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;51(7):924-928. PubMed link
This withdrawal study was conducted in order to determine withdrawal symptoms from these medications in the treatment of seizures and seizure disorders. Faster and slower rates of withdrawal were compared to a control group that maintained the medications. No significant differences in symptoms were found between groups.
31) Souza F, Mander A, Foggo M, Dick H, Shearing C, Goodwin G. The effects of lithium discontinuation and the non-effect of oral inositol upon thyroid hormones and cortisol in patients with bipolar affective disorder. J Affect Disord July 1991;22(3):165-170. PubMed link
The authors monitored hormone levels in 14 individuals who were withdrawn from lithium treatment. Significant changes in hormones were found among the participants, which the authors related to the research supporting decreased thyroid functioning during lithium treatment. Seven of the participants relapsed following withdrawal, and relapse was not associated with changes in hormones. 
32) Suppes, T, Baldessarini, RJ, Fredda, GL, Tohen, M. Risk of recurrence following discontinuation of lithium treatment in bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991;48:1082–1088. PubMed link
This article reviews research on the risks to users following discontinuation from lithium, first and foremost the risk of relapse. The possibility of a risk of users becoming refractory to lithium after discontinuing and then reintroducing it, as well as increased suicide risk, are discussed in terms of a being areas of concern that require further research.
33) Post R, Leverich G, Altshuler L, Mikalauskas K. Lithium-discontinuation-induced refractoriness: preliminary observations. Am J Psychiatry 1992;149(12):1727-1729. PubMed link
The authors present a case study of four individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder who experienced relapses following discontinuation of long-term treatment, followed by ineffectiveness of the treatment once reinstated. The authors suggest that this refractoriness may be a withdrawal effect.
34) Schou M. Is there a lithium withdrawal syndrome? An examination of the evidence. Br J Psychiatry 1993;163:514-518. PubMed link
After reviewing research evidence, the author concludes that little quality evidence of a withdrawal syndrome for lithium had been produced to date. In the review, Schou explores other interpretations of reported symptoms and methodological weaknesses of studies that have led to inconclusive results.
35) Ketter T, Malow B, Flamini R, White S, Post R, Theodore W. Anticonvulsant withdrawal-emergent psychopathology. Neurology 1994;44(1):55-61. PubMed link
The authors studied psychopathology symptoms that occurred during withdrawal of anticonvulsant (carbamazepine, valproic acid, or phenytoin) drugs used to treat seizures among 32 participants. Tapering ranged between 5 and 45 days. The authors found increases in reported symptoms in the final week of tapering, followed by dramatic increases once the drugs were discontinued. Moderate to severe pathology was documented in 12 participants, including 2 with psychotic symptoms. The authors conclude that this symptomatology may have been due in part to withdrawal effects.
36) Swartz C, Dolinar L. Encephalopathy associated with rapid decrease of high levels of lithium. Ann Clin Psychiatry 1995;7(4):207-209. PubMed link 
This case study documents neurotoxicity following rapid withdrawal from high doses of lithium, which the authors distinguish from toxicity resulting from high doses of lithium alone.
37) Bendz H, Sjödin I, Aurell M. Renal function on and off lithium in patients treated with lithium for 15 years or more. A controlled, prospective lithium-withdrawal study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11(3):457-460. PubMed link 
Results supported decreased kidney functioning in long-term lithium patients that persisted for 9 weeks after withdrawal. 
38) Darbar D, Connachie A, Jones A, Newton R. Acute psychosis associated with abrupt withdrawal of carbamazepine following intoxication. Br J Clin Pract 1996;50(6):350-351. PubMed link
This case study discusses the incidence of psychotic symptoms, including agitation and paranoid delusions, after withdrawal from a toxic dose of carbamazepine in a patient with no history of psychosis.
39) Tondo L, Baldessarini R, Floris G, Rudas N. Effectiveness of restarting lithium treatment after its discontinuation in bipolar I and bipolar II disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154(4):548-550. PubMed link
The authors studied the effects of withdrawing and restarting lithium treatment, finding no evidence to support any “refractoriness” after interruption of treatment.
40) Tondo L, Jamison K, Baldessarini R. Effect of lithium maintenance on suicidal behavior in major mood disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997;836:339-351. PubMed link
In this review, the authors discuss the evidence of an increased risk of suicidality following discontinuation of lithium.
41) Tondo, L, Baldessarini RJ, Hennen J, et al.: Lithium treatment and risk of suicidal behavior in bipolar disorder patients. J Clin Psychiatry 1998, 59:405–414. PubMed link
This article found an increased risk of suicidality in the year following discontinuation of lithium when compared to those who maintained treatment.
42) Baldessarini R, Tondo L, Hennen J. Effects of lithium treatment and its discontinuation on suicidal behavior in bipolar manic-depressive disorders. J Clin Psychiatry 1999;60 Suppl 2:77-84. PubMed link 
From their review, the authors conclude that lithium discontinuation, and particularly abrupt discontinuation, is associated with increased risk of suicidal ideation and death by suicide.
43) Bowden C. The ability of lithium and other mood stabilizers to decrease suicide risk and prevent relapse. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2000;2(6):490-494. PubMed link
In this review article, the author discusses evidence of suicide risk reduction via use of lithium, divalproex, and carbamazepine. Evidence for lithium’s effects were mostly drawn from naturalistic studies and suggest that length of lithium use may be a factor in the lower rates of suicidality found. The author also discusses two trials that compared lithium to other mood stabilizers, and that it remains unclear the extent to which any medication reduces suicide risk versus other psychosocial interventions delivered in the course of medication management.
44) Faedda G, Tondo L, Baldessarini R. Lithium discontinuation: uncovering latent bipolar disorder? Am J Psychiatry 2001;158(8):1337-1339. PubMed link
In this letter to the editor, the authors comment on a recent study of discontinuation of adjunctive lithium treatment among individuals with unipolar depression. The authors point out that the incidence of manic episodes after lithium withdrawal, and thus rediagnosis to bipolar disorder, is greater than would be expected than would be expected statistically. These results suggest that manic episodes experienced after discontinuation are withdrawal-related rather than relapse.
45) Gelisse P, Kissani N, Crespel A, Jafari H, Baldy-Moulinier M. Is there a lamotrigine withdrawal syndrome? Acta Neurol Scand 2002;105(3):232-234. PubMed link
This case reports describes the development of psychomotor inhibition in a patient withdrawn from lamotrigine abruptly. The authors discuss the possibility of a withdrawal syndrome, with typically minor and less typically severe reactions.
46) Carmaciu C, Anderson C, Lawton C. Thyrotoxicosis after complete or partial lithium withdrawal in two patients with bipolar affective disorder. Bipolar Disord 2003;5(5):381-384. PubMed link
In this case study the authors describe the emergence of thyrotoxicosis in two patients following withdrawal from lithium, one having been withdrawn fully and the other partially. The authors discuss possible explanations for the relationship between withdrawal and this condition and the need for further research. 
47) Yerevanian B, Koek R, Mintz J. Bipolar pharmacotherapy and suicidal behavior. Part I: Lithium, divalproex and carbamazepine. J Affect Disord 2007;103(1-3):5-11. PubMed link
The authors compared individuals maintained on lithium, divalproex, and carbamazepine to those withdrawn in rates of suicidality. For all three medications, rates of suicidality were higher after withdrawal of the medication than with treatment.
48) Frey L, Strom L, Shrestha A, Spitz M. End-of-dose emergent psychopathology in ambulatory patients with epilepsy on stable-dose lamotrigine monotherapy: a case series of six patients. Epilepsy Behav 2009;15(4):521-523. PubMed link
The authors identified six individuals via retrospective chart review who experienced distressing psychiatric symptoms during late-dose withdrawal from lamotrigine. The principal symptoms reported were anxiety and irritability. 
49) Grünfeld J, Rossier B. Lithium nephrotoxicity revisited. Nat Rev Nephrol 2009;5(5):270-276. PubMed link
This article reviews literature on the effects of lithium use on renal functioning. The authors discuss the costs and benefits of discontinuing lithium treatment, especially given that discontinuation can sometimes but not always improve renal functioning. 
50) Howland R. Potential adverse effects of discontinuing psychotropic drugs. Part 3: Antipsychotic, dopaminergic, and mood-stabilizing drugs. J Psychosoc Nurs 2010;48(8):11-14. PubMed link
Howland reviews research on potential withdrawal symptoms of mood instability and risk of mood episode relapse, with the highest risk associated with more sudden discontinuation. The anticonvulsants have different side effects, but generally discontinuation is also associated with mood instability, as well as anxiety, agitation, and sleep disturbance. These drugs, and thus their discontinuation, also affect metabolism of other medications. 
51) Werneke U, Ott M, Renberg E, Taylor D, Stegmayr B. A decision analysis of long-term lithium treatment and the risk of renal failure. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2012;126(3):186-197. PubMed link
The authors discuss relative risks and benefits of lithium continuation and discontinuation in response to kidney disease. The authors conclude that lithium continuation is still recommended in most cases given risk of relapse and suicide upon discontinuation.
52) Chen M, Zhang W, Guo Z, Zhang W, Chai Y, Li Y. Withdrawal reaction of carbamazepine after neurovascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: a preliminary study. J Neurol Sci 2014;338(1-2):43-45. PubMed link
Ninety patients were followed after carbamazepine withdrawal; 26 patients reported withdrawal symptoms within 4 days of withdrawal. Symptoms included insomnia, dysphoria, hallucination, hand fremitus, and headaches, and symptoms alleviated within 1 week.
Discontinuation Success Rates
The incidence of withdrawal-related relapses is fairly well-established for lithium, although less is known about discontinuation of other drugs in this class. Differentiation of symptoms that result from drug withdrawal from a recurrence of illness is not systematic in the research literature, making it difficult to assess withdrawal (see Peter Breggin’s book Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal: A Guide for Prescribers, Therapists, Patients, and Their Families and Guy Chouinard’s article “Issues in the clinical use of benzodiazepines: potency, withdrawal and rebound” in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry for further discussion of this issue). Dropouts from clinical studies also complicate this research. Shorter term studies favor drug-treated groups over those taking placebo in terms of risk of relapse, but longer term studies suggest that the risk of relapse is comparable for those who maintain drug treatment and those who withdraw. In addition, the time spent withdrawing the drug treatment may affect the risk of relapse, with abrupt withdrawal increasing that risk. (See “tapering speed” section below.”)
53) Baastrup P, Poulsen J, Schou M, Thomsen K, Amdisen A. Prophylactic lithium: double blind discontinuation in manic-depressive and recurrent-depressive disorders. Lancet 1970;2(7668):326-330. PubMed link
The authors found that 21 of 39 patients discontinued from lithium relapsed during the trial, whereas none of the patients who continued taking lithium relapsed. The authors reported that the relapses were distributed across the period of the trial (5 months) and did not indicate “rebound” effects.
54) Small JC, Small IF, Moore DF. Experimental withdrawal of lithium in recovered manic-depressive patients. Am J Psychiatry 1971:127:1555-1558. PubMed link
In this case study five patients were withdrawn from lithium; the authors found that 4 of the 5 patients relapsed within seven weeks of withdrawing from the drug.
55) Lapierre Y D, Gagnon A, Kokkinidis L. Rapid recurrence of mania following lithium withdrawal. Biol Psychiatry 1980:15:859-864. PubMed link
In this study of 20 patients who were withdrawn from lithium after a long period of mood stability, 4 were found to relapse within one week. The authors suggest that the manic relapses were rebound phenomena, reflecting a reaction to lithium withdrawal.
56) Klein H, Broucek B, Greil W. Lithium withdrawal triggers psychotic states. Br J Psychiatry 1981;139:255-256. PubMed link
In this study of lithium withdrawal of 21 patients, 11 patients relapsed within two weeks of discontinuation. Among the other 10 participants, discontinuation symptoms of anxiety, irritability, disturbed sleep, and some mood lability were reported.
57) Margo A, McMahon P. Lithium withdrawal triggers psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 1982:141:407-410. PubMed link
The authors of this case study of lithium withdrawal concluded that all 4 of 4 patients relapsed with manic episodes within 2 weeks of discontinuation.
58) Christodoulou G N, Lykouras E P. Abrupt lithium discontinuation in manic-depressive patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1982:65:310-314. PubMed link
Eighteen patients were discontinued from lithium and followed for 15 days. The authors found reduced side effects and no withdrawal symptoms in their sample, although 3 individuals relapsed within the first four days of discontinuation.
59) Sashidharan S, McGuire R. Recurrence of affective illness after withdrawal of long-term lithium treatment. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;68(2):126-133. PubMed link
The authors followed 22 patients who had discontinued lithium in this observational study and found that 16 experienced mood episode recurrence within 67 months of discontinuation. The observed that manic episodes seemed to occur closer to discontinuation than depressive episodes, and 4 of the 16 experienced a mood episode within 3 months of discontinuation.
60) Mander A. Is there a lithium withdrawal syndrome? Br J Psychiatry 1986;149:498-501. PubMed link
The author compared a control group of participants who had never taken lithium, or had taken it for less than three months, to those who were treated with lithium. All participants had been discharged from care and had been stable for three months afterward. Mander found that the risk of recurrence was higher for those who had taken lithium and discontinued use than in those who had never taken lithium, concluding that these results support the existence of a lithium withdrawal syndrome. Most relapses within the first three months of discontinuation were manic rather than depressive episodes.
61) Heh C, Sramek J, Herrera J, Costa J. Exacerbation of psychosis after discontinuation of carbamazepine treatment. Am J Psychiatry 1988;145(7):878-879. PubMed link
Twenty individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia were discontinued abruptly, with an exacerbation of psychotic symptoms for two individuals. The authors review several hypotheses that could account for the increase in symptoms following discontinuation.
62) Suppes T, Baldessarini R, Faedda G, Tohen M. Risk of recurrence following discontinuation of lithium treatment in bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991;48(12):1082-1088. PubMed link
The authors analyzed risk of recurrence from 14 studies in which participants were discontinued from lithium. They found that 50% of mood episodes that occurred following discontinuation occurred within the first 10 weeks after treatment was stopped.
63) Suppes T, Baldessarini R, Faedda G, Tondo L, Tohen M. Discontinuation of maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder: risks and implications. Harv Rev Psychiatry 1993;1(3):131-144. PubMed link
This review article discusses recurrence risk following discontinuation, as well as other potential risks such as treatment refractoriness and suicidality. 
64) Scull D, Trimble MR. Mania precipitated by carbamazepine withdrawal. Br J Psychiatry 1995; 167:698. PubMed link
This case study of a woman being treated for epilepsy with carbamazepine describes the appearance of symptoms of mania following withdrawal, suggesting a possible relationship between withdrawal and “rebound” mania.
65) Johnson R, McFarland B. Lithium use and discontinuation in a health maintenance organization. Am J Psychiatry 1996;153(8):993-1000. PubMed link
The authors compared rate of mental health service use among patients who maintained lithium treatment and those who discontinued it, finding that those who discontinued had higher rates of psychiatric hospitalization and emergency services.
66) Coryell W, Winokur G, Solomon D, Shea T, Leon A, Keller M. Lithium and recurrence in a long-term follow-up of bipolar affective disorder. Psychol Med 1997;27(2):281-289. PubMed link
In this study, patients with bipolar disorder were followed for 5 years, with one group of patients continuing lithium prophylaxis and another group discontinuing and patients taking lithium were compared to those who were not. The authors suggest that lithium prophylaxis may be helpful in preventing relapse but not recurrence, as there was no significant difference between the two groups in rates of recurrence in the long term.
67) Kennebäck G, Ericson M, Tomson T, Bergfeldt L. Changes in arrhythmia profile and heart rate variability during abrupt withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs. Implications for sudden death. Seizure 1997;6(5):369-375. PubMed link
The authors studied cardiac symptoms in ten patients following abrupt withdrawal from carbamazepine and phenytoin in the last day of treatment and four days following withdrawal. The authors conclude that the cardiac symptoms associated with abrupt withdrawal may contribute to sudden unexpected deaths among patients with epilepsy.
68) Baldessarini R, Tondo L. Recurrence risk in bipolar manic-depressive disorders after discontinuing lithium maintenance treatment: an overview. Clin Drug Investig 1998;15(4):337-351. PubMed link
In this review, the authors conclude that discontinuation carries a risk of recurrence of mood symptoms, particularly within the first year of discontinuation, but that gradual discontinuation attenuates this risk. The authors also conclude that individuals risk only minor loss of effectiveness of lithium if it is reintroduced after discontinuation.
69) Baldessarini R, Tondo L, Viguera A. Discontinuing lithium maintenance treatment in bipolar disorders: risks and implications. Bipolar Disord 1999;1(1):17-24. PubMed link
This review of the research evidence highlights the increased risk of recurrence and suicidality after lithium discontinuation, particularly abrupt discontinuation, and the authors’ hypothesis that this phenomenon reflects a reaction the body’s adaptations to long-term treatment. The authors caution interpretation of discontinuation studies and any conclusion that the heightened recurrence risk resulting from discontinuation in placebo arms is comparable to non-treatment.
70) Davis J, Janicak P, Hogan D. Mood stabilizers in the prevention of recurrent affective disorders: a meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999;100(6):406-417. PubMed link
In this meta-analysis, Davis et al. conclude that maintenance lithium reduces relapses when compared to no treatment, and they present their argument against evidence of lithium withdrawal-related relapse.
71) Bowden C. The ability of lithium and other mood stabilizers to decrease suicide risk and prevent relapse. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2000;2(6):490-494. PubMed link
The author discusses evidence of reduced risk of relapse when patients are maintained with lithium or divalproex when compared to placebo, while also discussed the limitations of the designs of earlier studies from the 1970s that overinflated the apparent risk of relapse upon discontinuation.
72) Calabrese J, Suppes T, Monaghan E, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, prophylaxis study of lamotrigine in rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. Lamictal 614 Study Group. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61(11):841-850. PubMed link
This withdrawal study found that 23 of 89 participants who withdrew to placebo had not relapsed after the 26-week study period. Forty-nine required some intervention, and the remaining participants withdrew before the end of the study. The authors did not find a significant difference in the time to additional intervention between those withdrawn to placebo and those maintained on lamotrigine.
73) Macritchie K, Hunt N. Does ‘rebound mania’ occur after stopping carbamazepine? A pilot study. J Psychopharmacol 2000;14(3):266-268. PubMed link
This pilot study followed 6 individuals who had withdrawn carbamazepine treatment and did not support a “rebound” effect as has been reported with lithium discontinuation.
74) Bowden C, Calabrese J, DeVeaugh-Geiss J, et al. A placebo-controlled 18-month trial of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance treatment in recently manic or hypomanic patients with bipolar I disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60(4):392-400. PubMed link
This study compared patients who were all treated with lamotrigine before being maintained on lamotrigine, lithium, or placebo. Participants in the two maintenance treatment groups had significantly longer time to a subsequent mood episode than those who had discontinued.
75) Calabrese J, Bowden C, DeVeaugh-Geiss J, et al. A placebo-controlled 18-month trial of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance treatment in recently depressed patients with bipolar I disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64(9):1013-1024. PubMed link
Participants in this study were stabilized on lamotrigine in an open-label phase and then maintained on lamotrigine, lithium, or placebo. For those participants stabilized on lamotrigine and then withdrawn to placebo, the median time to treatment was significantly shorter than for those maintained on lithium or lamotrigine. Adverse events reported by placebo participants were headache, nausea, dizziness, tremor, rash, somnolence, diarrhea, insomnia, and infection or influenza. 
76) Jess G, Smith D, Mackenzie C, Crawford C. Carbamazepine and rebound mania. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161(11):2132-2133. PubMed link
The authors describe a case study of patient with no history of mood disorders who experienced manic symptoms after withdrawing from carbamazepine.
77) Biel M, Peselow E, Mulcare L, Case B, Fieve R. Continuation versus discontinuation of lithium in recurrent bipolar illness: a naturalistic study. Bipolar Disord 2007;9(5):435-442. PubMed link
This 2-year study followed 159 individuals who maintained treatment and 54 patients who discontinued lithium. Illness recurrence occurred in both groups, with higher odds of recurrence among the discontinued group.
78) Viguera A, Whitfield T, Cohen L, et al. Risk of recurrence in women with bipolar disorder during pregnancy: prospective study of mood stabilizer discontinuation.  Am J Psychiatry 2007;164(12):1817-1824. PubMed link
Pregnant female participants who had discontinued mood stabilizer treatment were compared to women who maintained drug treatment up to a year postpartum. Most participants were also taking adjunctive antidepressants. The authors reported higher risk of recurrence of bipolar symptoms among those who had discontinued medication, as well as longer duration of episodes. Postpartum findings were not reported. 
79) Franks M, Macritchie K, Mahmood T, Young A. Bouncing back: is the bipolar rebound phenomenon peculiar to lithium? A retrospective naturalistic study. J Psychopharmacol 2008;22(4):452-456. PubMed link
This study found that the “rebound” of bipolar disorder symptoms after discontinuation of medication occurred in the majority (74%) of cases reviewed and included those discontinuing all medications in this class. Rates of relapse were highest among those who had withdrawn from lithium and anticonvulsants versus those discontinuing antidepressants or antipsychotics. 
80) Moncrieff J. The myth of the chemical cure: a critique of psychiatric drug treatment. 2009; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Publisher link
Moncrieff critically reviews clinical trials on prophylactic treatment with lithium and other mood stabilizing drugs, noting the many methodological issues in this research that make it difficult to determine if long-term treatment does in fact reduce the risk of mania and/or depression in comparison to no treatment. 
81) Sharma P, Kongasseri S, Praharaj S. Outcome of mood stabilizer discontinuation in bipolar disorder after 5 years of euthymia. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2014;34(4):504-507. PubMed link
This study followed 23 individuals withdrawing from lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine after at least 5 years of prophylactic treatment. Discontinuation was planned over 3 to 12 months. Twenty individuals had a recurrent manic episode following discontinuation; the time to the recurrent episode was a median of 10 months. 
82) Simhandl C, König B, Amann B. A prospective 4-year naturalistic follow-up of treatment and outcome of 300 bipolar I and II patients. J Clin Psychiatry 2014;75(3):254-262. PubMed link
The authors followed 300 patients over 4 years and found that stopping medication, either by the patient or the prescribing psychiatrist, decreased the time to relapse in comparison to those who maintained medication, including those who reduced their dosage. No differences in risk to relapse were found in relation to various demographic and clinical variables or bipolar I versus bipolar II diagnoses.
Tapering Speed
Most researchers agree that gradual tapering (2 weeks or longer) of lithium is safer than abrupt tapering (less than two weeks). This conclusion has been broadened to other mood stabilizers, although less research supports the superiority of a particular tapering speed among the anticonvulsant drugs.
83) Baldessarini R, Tondo L, Faedda G, Suppes T, Floris G, Rudas N. Effects of the rate of discontinuing lithium maintenance treatment in bipolar disorders. J Clin Psychiatry 1996;57(10):441-448. PubMed link
In this trial comparing of rapid (1-14 days) and gradual (15-30 days) discontinuation of lithium, the time to recurrence was 5 times faster with rapid discontinuation and specifically in the first year after discontinuation. Participants were 20 times more likely to be stable 3 years post-discontinuation following a gradual versus rapid taper. 
84) Darbar D, Connachie A, Jones A, Newton R. Acute psychosis associated with abrupt withdrawal of carbamazepine following intoxication. Br J Clin Pract 1996;50(6):350-351. PubMed link
Due to the incidence of psychotic symptoms following withdrawal from a toxic dose of carbamazepine, the authors suggested slow tapering of carbamazepine treatment given the risk of these symptoms after abrupt withdrawal.
85) Faedda G, Tondo L, Baldessarini R, Suppes T, Tohen M. Outcome after rapid vs gradual discontinuation of lithium treatment in bipolar disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993;50(6):448-455. PubMed link
In comparing gradual versus rapid discontinuation, the authors found that risk of recurrence was higher among those who had discontinued rapidly, and that this risk was highest within the first year of discontinuation. Beyond the first year, recurrence rates were not significantly different between groups. 
86) Baldessarini R, Tondo L, Floris G, Rudas N. Reduced morbidity after gradual discontinuation of lithium treatment for bipolar I and II disorders: a replication study. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154(4):551-553. PubMed link
This replication study (Faedda et al., 1993) included a 2-year follow-up of participants withdrawn rapidly (less than 2 weeks) or gradually (2+ weeks) from lithium. Slower discontinuation was associated with increased latency to first relapse; in addition, significantly more of the gradual taper group had remained stable at the 2-year follow-up than the rapid taper group. Thus, the authors conclude that gradual discontinuation could reduce recurrent episodes as well as delaying them.
87) Baldessarini R, Tondo L. Recurrence risk in bipolar manic-depressive disorders after discontinuing lithium maintenance treatment: an overview. Clin Drug Investig 1998;15(4):337-351. PubMed link
In this review of studies on lithium discontinuation, the authors provide support for their hypothesis that gradual discontinuation (over 2-4 weeks) reduces risk of relapse versus more abrupt discontinuation (2 weeks or less). The authors propose that the brain’s need to adapt gradually to the withdrawal of lithium accounts for this reduced risk.
88) Baldessarini R, Tondo L, Viguera A. Discontinuing lithium maintenance treatment in bipolar disorders: risks and implications. Bipolar Disord 1999;1(1):17-24. PubMed link
In this study, the authors reviewed research on clinical effects of lithium discontinuation, concluding that a) discontinuation increases suicide risk and risk of relapse and b) gradual tapering is associated with less risk.
89) Gelisse P, Kissani N, Crespel A, Jafari H, Baldy-Moulinier M. Is there a lamotrigine withdrawal syndrome? Acta Neurol Scand 2002;105(3):232-234. PubMed link
This case reports describes the development of psychomotor inhibition in a patient withdrawn from lamotrigine abruptly. The authors recommend withdrawal of lamotrigine over two weeks whenever possible to reduce risk.
90) Perlis R, Sachs G, Rosenbaum J, et al. Effect of abrupt change from standard to low serum levels of lithium: a reanalysis of double-blind lithium maintenance data. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159(7):1155-1159. PubMed link
Ninety-four patients were followed for up to 182 weeks after maintaining their dose of lithium or dose reduction. The authors conclude that the abrupt change in lithium serum levels is a stronger predictor of illness recurrence than dosage, and thus that abrupt dose changes should be avoided.
91) Cavanagh J, Smyth R, Goodwin G. Relapse into mania or depression following lithium discontinuation: a 7-year follow-up. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004;109(2):91-95. PubMed link
Through long-term follow-up after discontinuation of lithium, the results of this study support that the risk of relapse is highest immediately after acute discontinuation. The authors did not find evidence of significantly increased risk of relapse after the increased period of risk immediately after discontinuation.

Thank You Ms Wheeler and Mia.

Thursday, April 6, 2017

Withdrawal From ADHD Medications

madinamerica
By Shannon Peters December 19, 2016

Editor’s note: We know that our reviews of the withdrawal literature are incomplete, and we urge readers to help us add to these withdrawal reviews. Please send study citations that are relevant to the withdrawal literature for stimulants to rwhitaker@madinamerica.com.

 
Introduction

Much of the research on withdrawal from stimulant drugs is focused on the effects of withdrawal from recreational use or abuse of these drugs, as opposed to modeling discontinuation of these drugs following treatment for ADHD. This is true of both the animal studies and human studies. Nevertheless, this research literature provides insight into how stimulant use changes the brain; possible long-lasting behavioral effects from such brain changes, and withdrawal symptoms.
Mechanism of Action and Drug-Induced Compensatory Response

Both stimulants and non-stimulants are prescribed to treat ADHD. Stimulant medications are the most commonly prescribed, and are of two classes: amphetamines and methylphenidate. The amphetamines include mixed amphetamine salts (Adderall), dextroamphetamine (Dexedrine), and lisdexamfetamine (Vyanse). Amphetamines increase the amount of norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine in the brain by increasing the neuronal release of these neurotransmitters into the synaptic cleft (the tiny gap between neurons.)

The methylphenidate stimulants include Ritalin, Concerta, and Daytrana, and also dexmethylphenidate (Focalin). Methlyphenidates increase dopamine and norepinephrine activity in the brain by blocking their reuptake from the synaptic cleft. The neurotransmitters thus remain longer than normal in the synaptic cleft.

There are also two classes of non-stimulants for ADHD. Atomoxetine (Strattera) inhibits the reuptake of norepinephrine, and thus increases norepinephrine activity in the brain. The second class of non-stimulants are alpha adrenergic agents, such as guanfacine (Intuniv) and clonidine (Kapvay). Alpha adrenergic agents mimic epinephrine and norepinephrine and stimulate the same receptors as these neurotransmitters.

Given that these drugs increase dopamine and norepinephrine activity, they trigger compensatory responses in the brain that, in one way or another, alter this activity. These compensatory changes may include a change in the density of dopamine and norepinephrine receptors; a decrease in the production and release of these molecules by the presynaptic neurons; and changes in the density of transporter molecules involved in the reuptake of the neurotransmitters from the synaptic cleft.
Animal Studies

There is an abundance of animal research on the effects of withdrawal from stimulant drugs, mainly in the form of rat studies. Many of these studies focus on the effect of medications during adolescence on later drug abuse, with contradictory findings. However, in general, the animal studies on stimulant drug withdrawal strongly suggest that the drug exposure leads to a number of both short-term and long-lasting behavioral effects and brain changes.

Models of brain changes follow withdrawal from ADHD medications
Barr JL, Renner KJ, Forster GL. Withdrawal from chronic amphetamine produces persistent anxiety-like behavior but temporally-limited reductions in monoamines and neurogenesis in the adult rat dentate gyrus. Neuropharmacology. 2010;59(6):395-405. PubMed Link

In this study, researchers exposed adult male rats to amphetamine for two weeks and monitored them for four weeks of withdrawal. Results showed that rats had increased anxiety behaviors during withdrawal. The rats’ corticosterone levels were unchanged. Their norepinephrine and serotonin levels in the dentate gyrus of the brain were reduced immediately following treatment, showing evidence of reduced neurogenesis, or new neuron growth, but the levels did not remain low by the end of the study.

2) Sadasivan S, Pond BB, Pani AK, Qu C, Jiao Y, Smeyne RJ. Methylphenidate exposure induces dopamine neuron loss and activation of microglia in the basal ganglia of mice. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33693. PubMed Link

Researchers administered methylphenidate at two doses to rats for 90 days during the developmental period that matches adolescence and young adulthood in humans, and studied the effects on the brain seven days after withdrawal. Researchers found increased levels of dopamine in the striatum for the lower dose, but not higher dose, of methylphenidate. The authors concluded that long-term therapeutic doses of methylphenidate can have long-term degenerating effects in the brain.

3) Somkuwar SS, Kantak KM, Dwoskin LP. Effect of methylphenidate treatment during adolescence on norepinephrine transporter function in orbitofrontal cortex in a rat model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2015;252:55-63. PubMed Link

Researchers orally exposed rats to methylphenidate from early to late adolescence and then discontinued the drug. Researchers found that during treatment, rats exposed to methylphenidate had lower than normal rates of norepinephrine reuptake. and considered this a normalization of the norepinephrine transporter through treatment. Three to five weeks after discontinuation, norepinephrine transporter function remained at this lower rate which the researchers concluded as persisting treatment effects even after drug discontinuation.

Impacts of ADHD medication treatment and withdrawal on later drug use

4) Brandon CL, Marinelli M, Baker LK, White FJ. Enhanced reactivity and vulnerability to cocaine following methylphenidate treatment in adolescent rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;25(5):651-61. PubMed Link

Researchers exposed rats to methylphenidate during adolescence, withdrew the drug, and then studied rats’ behavior toward cocaine as adults. Findings showed that rats exposed to low doses, but not moderate doses, of methylphenidate engaged in more cocaine self-administration. Researchers concluded that early exposure to low doses of methylphenidate may increase susceptibility to low doses of cocaine, and consequently increase risk of cocaine use as adults.

5) Andersen SL, Arvanitogiannis A, Pliakas AM, LeBlanc C, Carlezon WA. Altered responsiveness to cocaine in rats exposed to methylphenidate during development. Nature Neuroscience. 2002;5(1):13-4. PubMed Link

Researchers exposed pre-adolescent rats to methylphenidate and then withdrew the drug in order to study its effects on the rats’ responsiveness to cocaine in adulthood. They found that the rats were less responsive to cocaine’s rewarding effects and concluded that pre-adolescent exposure to methylphenidate may cause lasting changes to dopaminergic function. The researchers also studied rats exposed to methylphenidate in adulthood and concluded that neurobiological effects differ depending on the developmental stage when rats are exposed to the medication.

6) Carlezon WA, Mague SD, Andersen SL. Enduring behavioral effects of early exposure to methylphenidate in rats. Biological Psychiatry. 2003;54(12):1330-7. PubMed Link

In this study, researchers examined how exposure to methylphenidate or cocaine in preadolescence affected behaviors in adult rats. Researchers found that exposure to methylphenidate in preadolescence can cause behavioral changes in adulthood including finding cocaine less rewarding and demonstrating depressive-like symptoms.

7) Mague SD, Andersen SL, Carlezon WA. Early developmental exposure to methylphenidate reduces cocaine-induced potentiation of brain stimulation reward in rats. Biological Psychiatry. 2005;57(2):120-5. PubMed Link

Researchers exposed rats to methylphenidate during pre-adolescence, withdrew the drug, and then studied the impacts on cocaine’s ability to simulate the reward system in the brain. The authors found that early exposure to methylphenidate resulted in a decreased effect of cocaine on the reward system, suggesting that the dopamine system functioned in an abnormal manner.

8) Augustyniak PN, Kourrich S, Rezazadeh SM, Stewart J, Arvanitogiannis A. Differential behavioral and neurochemical effects of cocaine after early exposure to methylphenidate in an animal model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavioural Brain Research. 2006;167(2):379-82. PubMed Link

Researchers exposed pubertal rats to methylphenidate and then withdrew the drug to examine its effects on cocaine use and dopamine levels in adulthood. The researchers found that the exposure reduced the rats’ sensitivity to cocaine in adulthood, but did not alter the dopamine system in the mesolimbic brain pathway.

9) Gill KE, Pierre PJ, Daunais J, Bennett AJ, Martelle S, Gage HD, Swanson JM, Nader MA, Porrino LJ. Chronic treatment with extended release methylphenidate does not alter dopamine systems or increase vulnerability for cocaine self-administration: a study in nonhuman primates. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(12):2555-65. PubMed Link

In this rhesus monkey model for ADHD treatment, monkeys were given methylphenidate for a year and studied 3-5 months after discontinuation of treatment. Findings showed that methylphenidate-treated monkeys had unchanged levels of specific dopamine receptor, D2/D3, while controls had a decreasing number of receptors (a decrease of receptors in this context is seen as a developmental process of synaptic pruning). The authors found no evidence that methylphenidate increases vulnerability to cocaine later in life.

10) Somkuwar SS, Jordan CJ, Kantak KM, Dwoskin LP. Adolescent atomoxetine treatment in a rodent model of ADHD: effects on cocaine self-administration and dopamine transporters in frontostriatal regions. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(13):2588-97. PubMed Link

Researchers exposed rats to atomoxetine during adolescence, withdrew the drug, and then studied the impacts on cocaine self-administration and on dopamine and norepinephrine transporters. Findings showed that atomoxetine did not increase vulnerability to cocaine and authors concluded that atomoxetine may be a better treatment choice than methylphenidate when the prescriber is worried about drug abuse.

11) Jordan CJ, Harvey RC, Baskin BB, Dwoskin LP, Kantak KM. Cocaine-seeking behavior in a genetic model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder following adolescent methylphenidate or atomoxetine treatments. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2014;140:25-32. PubMed Link

Researchers exposed rats to methylphenidate and atomoxetine during adolescence, withdrew the drug, and then studied rats’ cocaine-seeking behavior as adults. Results showed that adult rats previously treated with methylphenidate had increased cocaine intake, but there was no increase in cocaine intake for rats previously treated with atomoxetine. Neither drug resulted in increases in cocaine seeking in adulthood.

12) Jordan CJ, Taylor DM, Dwoskin LP, Kantak KM. Adolescent D-amphetamine treatment in a rodent model of ADHD: Pro-cognitive effects in adolescence without an impact on cocaine cue reactivity in adulthood. Behavioural Brain Research. 2016;297:165-79. PubMed Link

Researchers exposed rats to d-amphetamine during adolescence, withdrew the drug, and then studied rats’ cocaine-seeking behavior as adults. The findings showed that d­-amphetamine exposure during adolescence did not change self-administration of cocaine and decreased cocaine-seeking behavior in adulthood. The authors concluded that treatment with d-amphetamine may result in lower risk of future cocaine use than methylphenidate treatment.

Behavioral impacts of withdrawal

13) Herman ZS, Trzeciak H, Chruściel TL, Kmieciak-Kołada K, Drybański A, Sokoła A. The influence of prolonged amphetamine treatment and amphetamine withdrawal on brain biogenic amine content and behaviour in the rat. Psychopharmacologia. 1971;21(1):74-81. PubMed Link

Researchers exposed rats to D–L-amphetamine sulphate for 9 months and studied the behavioral effects of the drug and drug withdrawal. Authors found that, during withdrawal, rats moved around less (measured for 12 days post-withdrawal) and had lower levels of noradrenaline and serotonin in the cerebellum part of the brain (measured at 3 days post-withdrawal).

14) Leith NJ, Barrett RJ. Amphetamine and the reward system: evidence for tolerance and post-drug depression. Psychopharmacologia. 1976;46(1):19-25. PubMed Link

In this study, researchers measured the effects of withdrawal from d-amphetamine on self-electrical brain stimulation, examining effects on the reward system in the brain. One day after d-amphetamine withdrawal, rats had reduced self-stimulation, which the authors interpreted as dysregulation in the brain’s reward system and depression.

15) Schreiber H, Bell R, Conely L, Kufner M, Palet J, Wright L. Diminished reaction to a novel stimulus during amphetamine withdrawal in rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 1976;5(6):687-90. PubMed Link

Researchers examined the effects of d-amphetamine withdrawal on response to a new stimulus. Rats were exposed to two doses of d-amphetamine or saline for eight days and tested one day after discontinuing the drug. Findings showed that rats exposed to more d-amphetamine had the least response to a new stimulus and rats exposed to the smaller dose of d-amphetamine had less response than control rats.

16) Simpson DM, Annau Z. Behavioral withdrawal following several psychoactive drugs. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 1977;7(1):59-64. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers assessed behavioral withdrawal from four types of psychoactive drugs, including amphetamine, by measuring self-electrical stimulation of the brain. Findings showed that rats exposed to amphetamine had increased rates of self-stimulation while on the drug, but decreased their self-stimulation during withdrawal.

17) Cassens G, Actor C, Kling M, Schildkraut JJ. Amphetamine withdrawal: Effects on threshold of intracranial reinforcement. Psychopharmacology. 1981;73(4):318-22. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers examined the effects of withdrawal from d-amphetamine on the threshold to activate the reward system in the brain. Results showed an increased threshold, meaning rats found a stimulus less rewarding than control rats, within 24 hours of withdrawal, with the highest threshold increase around 24 to 72 hours.

18) Kokkinidis L, Zacharko RM, Anisman H. Amphetamine withdrawal: A behavioral evaluation. Life sciences. 1986;38(17):1617-23. PubMed Link

In this study, researchers exposed mice to amphetamines for 10 days and studied the behavioral effects of withdrawal 24 hours after the mice’s last exposure to amphetamine. Results showed that withdrawn mice responded less to electrical stimulation in the brain, and moved less in the forced swim test. However, withdrawn mice did not differ from controls on behaviors in the shuttle escape task or acoustic startle reflex. The authors concluded that depressive behaviors induced by amphetamine withdrawal are due more to motivation than mechanisms of motor-activity or arousal.

19) Paulson PE, Camp DM, Robinson TE. Time course of transient behavioral depression and persistent behavioral sensitization in relation to regional brain monoamine concentrations during amphetamine withdrawal in rats. Psychopharmacology. 1991;103(4):480-92. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers investigated the withdrawal syndrome for d-amphetamine. Researchers found that withdrawn rats showed depressive behaviors as soon as two days post-withdrawal, but the behaviors were gone by one month. Depressive behaviors were associated with short-term lower levels of norepinephrine in the hypothalamus part of the brain.

20) Schindler CW, Persico AM, Uhl GR, Goldberg SR. Behavioral assessment of high-dose amphetamine withdrawal: importance of training and testing conditions. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 1994;49(1):41-6. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers investigated the effects of withdrawal from chronic (2 weeks) versus acute (one time) d-amphetamine use. Results showed that chronic rats engaged in less movement in a locomotor activity test 24-54 hours after withdrawal, and engaged in less movement during a swim test 36-72 hours after withdrawal.

21) Wise RA, Munn E. Withdrawal from chronic amphetamine elevates baseline intracranial self-stimulation thresholds. Psychopharmacology. 1995;117(2):130-6. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers measured self-stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus in the brain after withdrawal from amphetamine. Rats were exposed to amphetamine for six weeks and self-stimulation was measured starting at 36 hours post-withdrawal up to three weeks. Authors found that drug withdrawn rats engaged in self-stimulation less frequently and had higher thresholds, meaning they required a stronger stimulus to engage in self-stimulation. By two weeks after drug discontinuation, amphetamine exposed rats did not differ from control rats.

22) Barr AM, Phillips AG. Withdrawal following repeated exposure to d-amphetamine decreases responding for a sucrose solution as measured by a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology. 1999;141(1):99-106. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers investigated whether withdrawal from d-amphetamine after four days of exposure reduced rats’ effort for a natural reward of sugar water. Results showed that rats withdrawing from the drug were less motivated to obtain a natural reward.

23) Barr AM, Fiorino DF, Phillips AG. Effects of withdrawal from an escalating dose schedule of d-amphetamine on sexual behavior in the male rat. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 1999;64(3):597-604. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers investigated the impact of withdrawal from d-amphetamine on sexual behavior in male rats. Rats were exposed to d-amphetamine for four days and tested 12 hours after final dose. The results showed decreased motivation in preparatory sexual behaviors, but no change in consummatory behaviors.

24) Barr AM, Phillips AG. Increased successive negative contrast in rats withdrawn from an escalating-dose schedule of D-amphetamine. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 2002;71(1):293-9. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers examined the effects of withdrawal from d-amphetamine on behavior by measuring their consumption of sugar water compared to rats not exposed to the drug. Findings showed rats withdrawn from d-amphetamine that were previously given 34% sugar water and then given 4% sugar water consumed much less than controls for up to 60 hours. The authors understood this behavior to be connected to higher emotionality during withdrawal.

25) Russig H, Durrer A, Yee BK, Murphy CA, Feldon J. The acquisition, retention and reversal of spatial learning in the Morris water maze task following withdrawal from an escalating dosage schedule of amphetamine in Wistar rats. Neuroscience. 2003;119(1):167-79. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers examined the effects of d-amphetamine withdrawal on spatial learning using the Morris water maze task. Researchers found that rats withdrawing from amphetamine had enhanced reversal learning (learning to locate a new place in the water maze) than control rats.

26) Cryan JF, Hoyer D, Markou A. Withdrawal from chronic amphetamine induces depressive-like behavioral effects in rodents. Biological Psychiatry. 2003;54(1):49-58. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers investigated behavioral effects of amphetamine withdrawal. Findings showed a number of changes in behavior that reflect depressive symptoms including higher thresholds to activate reward system, less swimming and climbing behaviors in a forced swim test, and less movement in a mouse tail suspension test, lasting for the 72 hours of observation.

27) Peterson JD, Wolf ME, White FJ. Impaired DRL 30 performance during amphetamine withdrawal. Behavioural Brain Research. 2003;143(1):101-8. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers measured impulsivity during amphetamine withdrawal by measuring rats’ ability to wait at least 30 seconds to poke a hole with their nose in order to receive food. Rats were exposed to amphetamine for five days and then withdrawn from amphetamine for three days before testing began. Researchers found amphetamine withdrawn rats had more nose pokes than controls, demonstrating higher rates of impulsivity, for up to two weeks after withdrawal.

28) Che Y, Cui YH, Tan H, Andreazza AC, Young LT, Wang JF. Abstinence from repeated amphetamine treatment induces depressive-like behaviors and oxidative damage in rat brain. Psychopharmacology. 2013;227(4):605-14. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers explored causes of depressive symptoms in amphetamine withdrawal. Results showed that rats demonstrated depressive symptoms during withdrawal and that withdrawal caused oxidative damage in the brain.

Physiological Impacts of Withdrawal

29) Lynch MA, Leonard BE. Changes in brain γ-aminobutyric acid concentrations following acute and chronic amphetamine administration and during post amphetamine depression. Biochemical pharmacology. 1978;27(14):1853-5. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers investigated changes of GABA, an inhibitory neurotransmitter, in different parts of the brain from d-amphetamine exposure and withdrawal. After an increase in GABA during administration of the drug, researchers found that GABA levels decreased to normal levels compared to the control group within 7 days of withdrawal in the striatum and brain stem. They also found that GABA levels in the amygdala increased during withdrawal. The authors described the rats as behaviorally depressed during withdrawal.

30) Cassens G, Kuruc A, Orsulak PJ, Schildkraut JJ. Amphetamine withdrawal: effects on brain levels of MHPG-SO4 in the rat. Communications in psychopharmacology. 1979;3(4):217. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers measured brain levels of a metabolite of norepinephrine, MHPG-SO4, after withdrawal from d-amphetamine. The authors found that up to 48 hours after withdrawal, rats had decreased MHPG-SO4 levels.

31) Koike Y, Togashi H, Shimamura K, Yomaida I, Saito H. Effects of abrupt cessation of treatment with clonidine and guanfacine on blood pressure and heart rate in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clinical and experimental hypertension. 1981;3(1):103-20. PubMed Link

In this rat study, authors researched the impact of guanfacine withdrawal on blood pressure. Rats had low blood pressure while exposed to 5 weeks of guanfacine, and abrupt discontinuation of the medication did not result in a fast rise in blood pressure.

32) Ricaurte G, Seiden LS, Schuster C. Further evidence that amphetamines produce long-lasting dopamine neurochemical deficits by destroying dopamine nerve fibers. Brain Research. 1984;303(2):359-64. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers administered either methamphetamine or amphetamine to rats for three days and then studied the effects on the brain two weeks after withdrawal. The authors found decreased levels of dopamine and evidence of nerve fiber degeneration in the striatum.

33) Swerdlow NR, Hauger R, Irwin M, Koob GF, Britton KT, Pulvirenti L. Endocrine, immune, and neurochemical changes in rats during withdrawal from chronic amphetamine intoxication. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1991;5(1):23-31. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers examined the impacts of withdrawal from 10-day amphetamine exposure. The researchers found that adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosterone levels, which are normally correlated, uncoupled by the fifth day of withdrawal, with the effect persisting for the 10 days of observation. They also found decreased levels of dopamine and ­­­­its metabolite, DOPAC, in certain brain regions. The researchers concluded this represented dysregulation in the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis.

34) Rossetti ZL, Hmaidan Y, Gessa GL. Marked inhibition of mesolimbic dopamine release: a common feature of ethanol, morphine, cocaine and amphetamine abstinence in rats. European Journal of Pharmacology. 1992;221(2-3):227-34. PubMed Link

In this rat study, authors investigated the effects on dopamine levels in the brain for a number of drugs that are frequently abused. The authors found that with amphetamine withdrawal, dopamine levels decreased quickly, to about 50% of control levels in the first day, and remained low for several days, and then return to levels equivalent to controls within 10 days.

35) Persico AM, Schindler CW, Brannock MT, Gonzalez AM, Surratt CK, Uhl GR. Dopaminergic gene expression during amphetamine withdrawal. Neuroreport. 1993;4(1):41-4. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers studied the effects of amphetamine withdrawal on gene expression that affects dopamine. The researchers did not find changes in dopaminergic gene expression, but found a slight increase in tyrosine hydroxylase gene expression and substantially decreased expression of a specific amine transporter, both of which are involved in dopamine transmission. The authors concluded that these changes in gene expression may be involved in restoring the balance of dopamine in the brain.

36) Persico AM, Schindler CW, Zaczek R, Brannock MT, Uhl GR. Brain transcription factor gene expression, neurotransmitter levels, and novelty response behaviors: alterations during rat amphetamine withdrawal and following chronic injection stress. Synapse. 1995;19(3):212-27. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers explored the effects of withdrawal from amphetamine on transcription factors that impact neurotransmitter gene expression in the brain. Findings showed decreased transcription factor and decreased dopamine levels in areas of the brain within 12 hours of withdrawal. The levels returned to normal, compared to control, by 54 hours.

37) Paulson PE, Robinson TE. Regional differences in the effects of amphetamine withdrawal on dopamine dynamics in the striatum: analysis of circadian patterns using automated on-line microdialysis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1996;14(5):325. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers explored behavioral symptoms and their connection to dopamine concentration in different brain regions during circadian rhythms at 3, 7, and 28 days post amphetamine withdrawal. Rats displayed depressive behaviors within a week of drug discontinuation and at 3 and 7 days post-withdrawal, rats had decreases in dopamine in the dorsolateral caudate nucleus. At 28 days, rats no longer presented with depressive behaviors and dopamine levels increased in the caudate and accumbens parts of the brain.

38) Melega WP, Raleigh MJ, Stout DB, Huang SC, Phelps ME. Ethological and 6-[18F] fluoro-L-DOPA-PET profiles of long-term vulnerability to chronic amphetamine. Behavioural Brain Research. 1997;84(1):259-68. PubMed Link

In this study on vervet monkeys, researchers used PET scans to measure dopamine function in the striatum of the brain. The researchers administered amphetamine to the monkeys to increase dopamine function, and then withdrew the drug after ten days. Findings showed that monkeys slowly recovered baseline dopamine functioning after 24 months of drug discontinuation.

39) Robinson TE, Kolb B. Persistent structural modifications in nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex neurons produced by previous experience with amphetamine. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1997;17(21):8491-7. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers examined the changes in the brain caused by exposure to amphetamine for a month after discontinuing the drug. They found a number of structural changes to neurons in specific parts of the brain that affect communication between neurons and hypothesized that these changes are connected to behavioral changes seen in humans after withdrawal from amphetamine abuse.

40) Raheem KA, Ismael N, Saad A, El-Sayad S. Gluconeogenic activity in response to chronic administration of amphetamine sulphate and drug withdrawal. General Pharmacology: The Vascular System. 1997;29(4):687-90. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers explored the impact of chronic amphetamine use and withdrawal on serum levels. Results showed that rats that discontinued amphetamine after four weeks of use had glucose levels close to controls, and glutamate oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) enzyme activity returned to normal, but corticosterone levels remained elevated during 30 hours of studied withdrawal. The authors conclude rats can recover from the effects of amphetamine after withdrawing from the drug.

41) Lu W, Monteggia LM, Wolf ME. Withdrawal from repeated amphetamine administration reduces NMDAR1 expression in the rat substantia nigra, nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience. 1999;11(9):3167-77. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers investigated whether NMDA receptors, a neuron receptor for the neurotransmitter glutamate, were altered by amphetamine use even after withdrawal. The researchers did not find changes in a subunit of the NMDA receptor after three days of withdrawal, but found decreased expression of the subunit of the receptor 14 days after withdrawal. The authors hypothesized that this may signify reduced excitation in dopaminergic neurons.

42) Onn SP, Grace AA. Amphetamine withdrawal alters bistable states and cellular coupling in rat prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens neurons recorded in vivo. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2000;20(6):2332-45. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers explored changes in gap junction functioning, a type of communication between neurons, in the corticoaccumbens network after withdrawal from amphetamine. Researchers found changes in gap junction function 28 days after withdrawal.

43) Murphy CA, Russig H, Pezze MA, Ferger B, Feldon J. Amphetamine withdrawal modulates FosB expression in mesolimbic dopaminergic target nuclei: effects of different schedules of administration. Neuropharmacology. 2003;44(7):926-39. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers investigated the effects on gene expression of withdrawal from a low dose compared to a moderately high dose of amphetamine. Findings showed an increased expression of the FosB gene only in the higher dose. The authors concluded that withdrawal from a higher dose of amphetamine changes gene expression that impacts dopamine, but that does not affect monoamine levels.

44) Kolb B, Gorny G, Li Y, Samaha AN, Robinson TE. Amphetamine or cocaine limits the ability of later experience to promote structural plasticity in the neocortex and nucleus accumbens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100(18):10523-8. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers examined the effects of amphetamine and cocaine use on neural plasticity, the ability for the brain to adapt, after 3.5 months of withdrawal. The authors found that rats previously exposed to amphetamine had inhibited neural plasticity when exposed to a complex environment and concluded that even after withdrawal, amphetamine use may lead to persistent behavioral and cognitive deficits.

45) Mohila CA, Onn SP. Increases in the density of parvalbumin-immunoreactive neurons in anterior cingulate cortex of amphetamine-withdrawn rats: evidence for corticotropin-releasing factor in sustained elevation. Cerebral Cortex. 2005;15(3):262-74. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers investigated changes to the inhibitory neurotransmitter, GABA’s, signaling in the brain during withdrawal from amphetamines. Researchers concluded that withdrawal from amphetamine alters GABA signaling.

46) McCracken CB, Patel KM, Vrana KE, Paul DL, Roberts D. Amphetamine withdrawal produces region‐specific and time‐dependent changes in connexin36 expression in rat brain. Synapse. 2005;56(1):39-44. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers explored changes in gap junction functioning, a type of communication between neurons, after withdrawal from extended amphetamine exposure. Findings showed that during the withdrawal period there were changes in the expression of a gap junction protein, connexin36, in brain regions considered to be involved in sensitization and addiction.

47) Russig H, Pryce CR, Feldon J. Amphetamine withdrawal leads to behavioral sensitization and reduced HPA axis response following amphetamine challenge. Brain Research. 2006;1084(1):185-95. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers investigated stress hormone release related to depression-like symptoms during amphetamine withdrawal. Rats were exposed to amphetamine three times a day for three days and withdrawal was studied for 30 days. Results showed no effect of withdrawal on release of adrenocorticotropic hormone or corticosterone in stressful situations.

48) Parelkar NK, Wang JQ. Upregulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 8 mRNA expression in the rat forebrain after repeated amphetamine administration. Neuroscience Letters. 2008;433(3):250-4. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers measured gene expression of glutamate receptors in the forebrain in response to amphetamine exposure and withdrawal. Findings showed significant increases in glutamate receptor gene expression at both one and 21 days after withdrawal.

49) Boikess SR, O’Dell SJ, Marshall JF. A sensitizing d-amphetamine dose regimen induces long-lasting spinophilin and VGLUT1 protein upregulation in the rat diencephalon. Neuroscience Letters. 2010;469(1):49-54. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers investigated synaptic protein expression in the diencephalon part of the brain one month after discontinuing amphetamine. Results showed differences from controls in some, but not all areas of the diencephalon. Authors concluded that amphetamine use does alter the brain even after medication is discontinued, and changes may occur more in excitatory synapses.

50) Murray RC, Hebbard JC, Logan AS, Vanchipurakel GA, Gilbert YE, Horner KA. Stress and withdrawal from d-amphetamine alter 5-HT2A receptor mRNA expression in the prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience Letters. 2014;559:44-9. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers measured the effects of both withdrawal from amphetamine and stress, induced by a forced swim test, on serotonin receptor gene expression at 24 hours and four days post withdrawal. Findings showed that 24 hours after withdrawal, rats had decreased expression of the serotonin receptor gene than controls, with no impact based on the forced swim test. But, at 4 days, withdrawn rats showed higher levels of expression than controls, and levels were lowered by the forced swim test. The authors concluded that stress can prolong decreased serotonin functioning caused by withdrawal.

51) Renard GM, Sotomayor‐Zarate R, Blanco EH, Gysling K. Withdrawal from chronic amphetamine reduces dopamine transmission in the rat lateral septum. Journal of Neuroscience Research. 2014;92(7):937-43. PubMed Link

In this rat study, researchers investigated the impact of amphetamine withdrawal on dopamine transmission in the lateral septum, a part of the brain thought to be involved in addiction. The researchers found decreased release of dopamine in the lateral septum, but not decreased levels of dopamine in the tissue for the 14 day duration of the observation period. The authors hypothesized that the decrease in dopamine release is caused by decreased dopamine reuptake during withdrawal.

Using Rat Model for Schizophrenia

52) Murphy CA, Fend M, Russig H, Feldon J. Latent inhibition, but not prepulse inhibition, is reduced during withdrawal from an escalating dosage schedule of amphetamine. Behavioral neuroscience. 2001;115(6):1247. PubMed Link

In this rat model for schizophrenia, researchers investigated amphetamine withdrawal symptoms. Rats were exposed to amphetamine for 6 days and tested up to four weeks after withdrawal. Results showed that expression of latent inhibition was eliminated during the withdrawal period, which they interpreted as potential evidence of a depressive state caused by withdrawal.

53) Russig H, Murphy CA, Feldon J. Prepulse inhibition during withdrawal from an escalating dosage schedule of amphetamine. Psychopharmacology. 2003;169(3-4):340-53. PubMed Link

In this rat model for schizophrenia, researchers studied effects of amphetamine withdrawal on prepulse inhibition, where exposure to a previous moderate-intensity stimulus decreases responsiveness to a later, higher-intensity stimulus. Researchers observed rats for up to 60 days post-withdrawal and did not find a difference in their prepulse inhibition compared to control rats. They did find a short-term decreased acoustic startle response and disruptions in latent inhibition.

54) Peleg-Raibstein D, Sydekum E, Feldon J. Differential effects on prepulse inhibition of withdrawal from two different repeated administration schedules of amphetamine. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;9(6):737-49. PubMed Link

In this rat model for schizophrenia, researchers investigated the effects of withdrawal from amphetamine at two different dosing schedules on behavior and brain monoamine levels. The researchers found that the rats that were given higher doses of amphetamine had reduced dopamine levels in the caudate putamen part of the brain 55 days after withdrawal.

55) Selemon LD, Begović A, Goldman-Rakic PS, Castner SA. Amphetamine sensitization alters dendritic morphology in prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons in the non-human primate. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007;32(4):919-31. PubMed Link

In this model of schizophrenia using rhesus monkeys, researchers exposed young adult monkeys to amphetamine for 6 or 12 weeks and studied changes in their brains 3 to 3.5 years after discontinuing amphetamine. Their findings suggested long-lasting degeneration of pyramidal dendrites in the prefrontal cortex.
Withdrawal Symptoms

Studies have been conducted to learn about the effects of withdrawal from stimulant drugs when being used recreationally or abused. Although these studies can provide information on potential withdrawal symptoms when discontinuing ADHD medication, it is important to note that stimulants used recreationally are often at higher doses and frequencies, as well as via different routes (such as injected, snorted, or smoked versus swallowing pills). Therefore, withdrawal effects from recreational use or abuse may be stronger than from prescription use. The most common withdrawal symptoms found in these studies were fatigue, altered sleep patterns, and depression.

56) Monroe RR, Drell HJ. Oral use of stimulants obtained from inhalers. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1947;135(14):909-15. PubMed Link

Authors studied inhaler misuse of amphetamines. Survey results from 264 inmates indicated the most common withdrawal effects were feeling tired, sleeping, shaking hands, and feeling sick to one’s stomach.

57) Oswald I, Thacore VR. Ampehtamine and phenmetrazine addiction: Physiological abnormalities in the abstinence syndrome. Br Med J, 1963;2(5354):427-31. PubMed Link

Authors studied six individuals with amphetamine addictions to assess the effect of withdrawal on sleep patterns. Withdrawal from the drug resulted in a large increase in REM sleep. Return to normal sleep patterns took up to eight weeks. Subjects also reported listlessness, depression, and sleepiness.

58) Watson R, Hartmann E, Schildkraut JJ. Amphetamine withdrawal: Affective state, sleep patterns, and MHPG excretion. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1972;129(3):263-9. PubMed Link

Authors studied four subjects who had been using moderately high doses of amphetamines for at least five months and wanted to discontinue their use. Results showed that subjects became depressed during drug withdrawal, most severely in the first few days, but persisting up to several months. Depression was positively related to increased REM sleep and decreased urine excretion of MHPG, a metabolite of norepinephrine, suggesting decreased levels of norepinephrine in the brain.

59) Gossop MR, Bradley BP, Brewis RK. Aphetamine withdrawal and sleep disturbance. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 1982;10(2):177-83. PubMed Link

Authors studied sleep patterns in 20 amphetamine dependent individuals during drug withdrawal in a hospital setting for 20 days. Results showed an initial period of over-sleeping followed by a longer period of under-sleeping. Amphetamine users also had more variability in their sleep patterns than the control group.

60) Tuma TA. Depressive stupor following amphetamine withdrawal. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 1993;49(5):361-3. PubMed Link

Author provided case studies of three men in Saudi Arabia who presented at a hospital after discontinuing recreational use of amphetamine. The author described depressive symptoms that all three men experienced and concluded that amphetamine withdrawal can cause a depressive stupor when the drug was taken for long periods.

61)Thompson P, Gillin J, Golshan S, Irwin M. Polygraphic sleep measures differentiate alcoholics and stimulant abusers during short-term abstinence. Biological Psychiatry. 1995;38(12):831-836. PubMed Link

Authors compared sleep patterns of individuals withdrawing from stimulants (amphetamines or cocaine) and alcohol. Results showed that individuals who abuse stimulants slept more and had more REM sleep during the first 10 days of withdrawal than days 11-14. Compared to controls, stimulant users had similar amounts of sleep during the first 10 days, but below normal amounts of sleep during days 11-14.

62) Cantwell B, McBride AJ. Self detoxication by amphetamine dependent patients: A pilot study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1998;49(2):157-63. PubMed Link

Authors interviewed fifty current or past amphetamine dependent clients about previous attempts to stop using amphetamines. All but two subjects injected amphetamines intravenously. Eighty six percent of subjects reported symptoms of withdrawal with the most common symptoms being irritability, aches and pains, feeling depressed, and impaired social functioning. Subjects reported that the symptoms lasted up to three weeks.

63) Schuckit MA, Daeppen JB, Danko GP, Tripp ML, Smith TL, Li TK, Hesselbrock VM, Bucholz KK. Clinical implications for four drugs of the DSM-IV distinction between substance dependence with and without a physiological component. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;156(1):41-9. PubMed Link

Authors interviewed individuals diagnosed with substance dependence. Results showed that 87% of subjects identified as amphetamine-dependent experienced withdrawal effects.
Discontinuation Success Rates

Very few studies have explicitly explored how to come off of ADHD medications and withdrawal side effects in humans. The studies that have been done do not suggest there is a strong difference between tapering or abruptly discontinuing ADHD medications.

64) Wernicke JF, Adler L, Spencer T, West SA, Allen AJ, Heiligenstein J, Milton D, Ruff D, Brown WJ, Kelsey D, Michelson D. Changes in symptoms and adverse events after discontinuation of atomoxetine in children and adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A prospective, placebo-controlled assessment. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004;24(1):30-35. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000104907.75206.c2. PubMed Link

Researchers investigated the potential for discontinuation syndrome of atomoxetine in children and adults diagnosed with ADHD, who had been taking the medication for 9-10 weeks and then discontinued the medication all at once. Results showed that subjects had worsening of ADHD symptoms, but not to pretreatment levels. Researchers did not find evidence of a discontinuation syndrome and determined atomoxetine can be safely discontinued, and tapering is not necessary.

65) Kisicki JC, Fiske K, Lyne A. Phase I, Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of the effects on blood pressure of abrupt cessation versus taper down of guanfacine extended-release tablets in adults aged 19 to 24 years. Clinical Therapeutics. 2007;29(9):1967-1979. doi: l0.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.020. PubMed Link

Researchers investigated the effects of abrupt cessation versus taper-down of guanfacine ER on blood pressure. Researchers did not find significant differences in blood pressure for abrupt cessation compared to taper-down. Both treatment groups had a significantly greater decrease in systolic blood pressure than the placebo group by the first day that medication was reduced/withdrawn, but it was no longer significant at the end of the trial. The most common side effects were headache, dry mouth, and fatigue in the abrupt cessation group and dry mouth in the taper-down group.
Conclusion

In sum, the animal research suggests that there are a number of withdrawal effects when discontinuing from stimulant drugs. However, this evidence is limited as results from animal studies are difficult to translate into effects for humans and most of the animal research is mimicking abusive levels of stimulant drugs rather than prescribed doses that are common when treating ADHD. Human studies on withdrawing from stimulants for recreational use have similar findings as animal studies and outline a number of withdrawal effects, primarily fatigue, altered sleep patterns, and depression. Because individuals who abuse stimulants are often taking higher, more frequent doses of the drug, their withdrawal symptoms are most likely more severe than individuals withdrawing from prescription doses. There is very limited research in humans on the effects of coming off ADHD prescription medication, or studies that could provide information on how to come off the medication. However, compared to other psychiatric medications, ADHD medications appear easier to discontinue with less severe withdrawal effects. 



Thank You Ms Peters and MIA.

Withdrawal From Antidepressants

madinamerica
By Akansha Vaswani December 19, 2016

Editor’s note: We know that our reviews of the withdrawal literature are incomplete, and we urge readers to help us add to these withdrawal reviews. Please send study citations that are relevant to the withdrawal literature for antidepressants to rwhitaker@madinamerica.com


Introduction

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) have been used in the treatment of depression since the late 1980s. Serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) were introduced in the 1990s. It is proposed that SSRIs work by increasing serotonin activity in the brain, and that SNRIs work by increasing both serotonin and norepinephrine. These are chemicals that have been linked to the regulation of mood.

Although these drugs were initially indicated for depression, they have also been FDA approved for other conditions, including anxiety disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, premenstrual dysphoric disorder and fibromyalgia. Antidepressant medication (ADM) use has dramatically increased over the last few years in the United States; about 1 in 10 Americans aged 12 and over take an ADM. This document reviews drugs classified as SSRIs or SNRIs, although a bulk of the research focuses on SSRIs.
Mechanism of Action

1) Moncrieff J, Cohen D. Do antidepressants cure or create abnormal brain states? Plos Medicine. 2006;3(7):e240-e. Link

The authors provide evidence against the “disease model” of depression which states that depression is the result of a biochemical abnormality that ADM corrects. They argue for the adoption of a “drug-centred model” which posits that ADM lead to the creation of an abnormal brain that can have an effect on certain symptoms of depression. Treatment decisions should be based on the short-term, known effects of the drug according to this view.

2) Fava GA. Can long-term treatment with antidepressant drugs worsen the course of depression? Journal Of Clinical Psychiatry. 2003;64(2):123-33. Pubmed link

This literature review summarizes research supporting the oppositional tolerance hypothesis, that is continued treatment with ADM may activate processes that go against the initial effects of the drug and lead to a loss of clinical effect. At worse these processes can continue even when the drug is discontinued and increase vulnerability to relapse. The author proposes that withdrawal symptoms that occur after an ADM is discontinued may be clinical evidence of the oppositional tolerance hypothesis.

3) Andrews P, Kornstein S, Halberstadt L, Gardner C, Neale M. Blue Again: Perturbational Effects of Antidepressants Suggest Monoaminergic Homeostasis in Major Depression. Full Text Link

This meta-analysis tests the “oppositional tolerance” hypothesis – that is patients whose symptoms lessen with ADM treatment will have a higher risk of relapse after treatment stops than patients whose symptoms improve without ADM. It further tests the hypothesis that greater oppositional tolerance is linked to the greater disturbance of the monoamine neurotransmitter system in the brain. Both hypotheses were supported – over time ADM use leads to an increased risk of relapse, and this risk is even greater when the drug has more of an impact on the monoamine system. The authors compare these findings to the mechanism of action of of a spring – the further a spring is pulled away from it’s equilibrium or original position, the greater will be the force produced by this spring when it is released.
Animal Studies: Long-term Effects of Exposure to ADMs

4) Kepser L-J, Homberg JR. The neurodevelopmental effects of serotonin: A behavioural perspective. Behavioural Brain Research. 2015 1/15/;277:3-13. Pubmed link

This is a review of animal studies which summarizes the behavioral effects of early exposure to SSRIs. The authors conclude that serotonin disturbances during the prenatal and postnatal phases are linked to an increased risk for mood disorders whereas the risk for autism-like behaviors and sexual abnormalities is linked to increased serotonin levels in the postnatal period. These findings in rats are discussed in relation to similar findings on the role of serotonin exposure in human studies.

5) Maciag D, Simpson KL, Coppinger D, et al. Neonatal antidepressant exposure has lasting effects on behavior and serotonin circuitry. Neuropsychopharmacology: Official Publication Of The American College Of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31(1):47-57. Pubmed link

This study provides evidence that rats exposed to an SSRI very early in life displayed disruptions in behavior as adult rats, long after the medications had been discontinued. This cluster of behavior changes called the “neonatal antidepressant exposure syndrome” are discussed in light of the implications of exposure to ssris at critical phases of brain development. Similar changes were not seen in rats exposed to ssris as adults.

6) Hilakivi LA, Hilakivi I. Increased adult behavioral ‘despair’ in rats neonatally exposed to desipramine or zimeldine: an animal model of depression? Pharmacology, Biochemistry, And Behavior. 1987;28(3):367-369. Pubmed link

In this study rats were exposed to a tricyclic ADM and an SSRI from 7-18 days after they were born. ADM was stopped after this period. The adult rats were assessed at 2 months and 5 months and it was found that early ADM exposure had negative emotional effects, which was observed in their behavioral responses to a stressful situation. These findings are explained as a cause of a reduction of neurotransmitters like serotonin and dopamine in the forebrain because of early exposure to ADM that cause changes that do not renormalize.

7) de Jong TR, Snaphaan LJAE, Pattij T, et al. Effects of chronic treatment with fluvoxamine and paroxetine during adolescence on serotonin-related behavior in adult male rats. European Neuropsychopharmacology: 2006;16(1):39-48. Pubmed link

Results of this study indicate that there are some effects on adult sexual activity and anxiety behaviors after adolescent SSRI exposure. However, the authors are unclear about whether these findings are limited to adolescent exposure, whether serotonin receptors play a role and did not investigate whether these effects are temporary or permanent.

8) Gouvêa TS, Morimoto HK, de Faria MJSS, Moreira EG, Gerardin DCC. Maternal exposure to the antidepressant fluoxetine impairs sexual motivation in adult male mice. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, And Behavior. 2008;90(3):416-9. Pubmed link

Exposure to SSRIs in utero is associated with impaired sexual motivation in adult male mice.

9) Iñiguez SD, Warren BL, Bolaños-Guzmán CA. Short- and Long-Term Functional Consequences of Fluoxetine Exposure During Adolescence in Male Rats. Biological Psychiatry. 2010;67(11):1057-66. Pubmed Link

The results of this study suggest that adolescent exposure to fluoxetine leads to lower levels of a behavioral response to a stressful situation in adulthood in male rats. This anxiety response reduced when the same rats were given fluoxetine for a few days as adults. The same long-term pattern was not observed in adult rats after their ADM was discontinued. Similarly, fluoxetine exposed adolescent rats showed signs of sexual dysfunction as adults. The authors conclude that exposure to the drug in adolescence can impact behavioral responses in adulthood.

10) Bosker FJ, Tanke MAC, Jongsma ME, et al. Biochemical and behavioral effects of long-term citalopram administration and discontinuation in rats: role of serotonin synthesis. Neurochemistry International. 2010;57(8):948-57. Pubmed link

The results of this study suggest that treatment with citalopram increased the number of serotonin receptors in the brain. The two treatment conditions were divided into a drug washout (abrupt discontinuation) and non-drug washout group (continuation). There were differences observed in these two groups on the turnover and synthesis of serotonin with an increase of both processes in the discontinuation group. There were also behavioral changes observed in the discontinuation but not the continuation or control groups. The authors conclude that chronic SSRI treatment does not impair brain serotonin function, but it may lead to an increased vulnerability fluctuations in its synthesis.

11) Raap DK, Garcia F, Muma NA, Wolf WA, Battaglia G, van de Kar LD. Sustained desensitization of hypothalamic 5-Hydroxytryptamine1A receptors after discontinuation of fluoxetine: inhibited neuroendocrine responses to 8-hydroxy-2-(Dipropylamino)Tetralin in the absence of changes in Gi/o/z proteins. The Journal Of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics. 1999;288(2):561-7. Link

The authors report a continued desensitization of a type of serotonin receptor (the 5-HT1A receptor) 60 days after discontinuation of fluoxetine, an SSRI, indicating that the receptors did not renormalize much after the medication had left the brain tissue. The authors conclude that mechanism of desensitization of receptors when the drugs are being used versus when they are discontinued are likely to be different. The implications of these results for humans are discussed.
Discontinuation Syndromes

12) Fava, M. . “Prospective Studies of Adverse Events Related to Antidepressant Discontinuation.” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (2006); 67, suppl. 4, 14-21. Pubmed link

Though varying in frequency and intensity, nearly all classes of antidepressants have been linked with discontinuation reactions and the associated psychological, physical, and somatic discomfort. Spontaneous reports have been typically used to gauge the risks of discontinuation reactions. Judging from a number of prospective studies, spontaneous reports very likely underestimate the occurrence of discontinuation reactions. The author provides a review of studies dealing with discontinuation-related adverse events.

13) Shelton, R. “The Nature of the Discontinuation Syndrome Associated With Antidepressant Drugs. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (2006); 67, suppl. 4, 3-7.

A common phenomenon accompanying treatment with nearly every major class of antidepressant is the emergence of the discontinuation syndrome. The term withdrawal has been used in the past; however, the distinctions between discontinuation symptoms and drug withdrawal are clear. In addition, awareness of the unique nature of discontinuation effects and a grasp of the typical time frame of their emergence can assist in distinguishing between discontinuation syndrome and relapse. As a result, it is vital that both patients and their relatives be provided with adequate education and a realistic and objective appraisal of expected outcomes upon initiation of antidepressant treatment, which may include experiencing discontinuation adverse events upon cessation of the drug treatment. Pubmed link

14) Smith, P. F. and C. L. Darlington. “A possible explanation for dizziness following SSRI discontinuation.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2010; 130(9): 981-983. Pubmed link

The authors provide an explanation for the often experienced symptom of dizziness upon SSRI discontinuation. They link to a reduction in a region of the brain that has an abundance of serotonin receptors. The implications of this finding are discussed.

15) Renoir T. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressant Treatment Discontinuation Syndrome: A Review of the Clinical Evidence and the Possible Mechanisms Involved. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2013; April 16, 4:45. Pubmed link

In this review the author examines the evidence for the phenomenon of a discontinuation syndrome and notes that even though it is clear that it exists, there are several limitations of existing studies. These include the absence of studies comparing drugs with similar half-lives but that have different effects upon discontinuation, the short durations of treatment interruptions and the lack of studies designed to take into account the pharmacokinetics of the drug and the role of its metabolite. He also summarizes the preclinical animal studies examining the effects of treatment discontinuation as well the limitations of this body of literature. For instance, they were designed to study the mechanism of action of SSRIs rather than the effects of discontinuation, and they used “normal” animals instead of animal models of depression. Potential directions for future studies that can shed light on our current limited understandings of the mechanism of discontinuation syndrome are discussed.

16) Michelson D, Fava M, Amsterdam J, et al. Interruption of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;176:363-8. Pubmed link

In this controlled study half the patients who had been taking SSRIs were assigned to continue their medication and the other half were given a placebo. The authors found that the effect of stopping the drug was associated with the drug’s half-life – the shorter the half-life, the more severe the adverse effects and functional impairment. The effects were most severe with paroxetine, followed by sertraline whereas no significant effects were observed upon discontinuing fluoxetine. The predominance of physical effects upon discontinuation were hypothesized as representing a drug induced reaction rather than a return of depression.

17) Rosenbaum JF, Fava M, Hoog SL, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor discontinuation syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Biol Psychiatry. 1998;44. Pubmed link

This study was conducted to understand the effects of ADM interruption for a brief period in light of “patient noncompliance” or missing doses. After being on a maintenance dose of ADM for anywhere between 4-24 months, 83% (192) patients were given a placebo instead of their ADM for 5-8 days. After this phase ADM was reintroduced. The frequency of psychological and somatic symptoms upon ADM interruption was greatest for paroxetine, followed by sertraline and lastly fluoxetine. Patients treated with sertraline and paroxetine but not fluoxetine also experienced a return of depressive symptoms. When the medication was reintroduced there was a rapid reduction of somatic symptoms and depression scores. Thus the results are hypothesized to reflect a response to the stopping of SSRIs rather than a relapse or return of depression.

18) Judge R, Parry MG, Quail D, et al. Discontinuation symptoms: comparison of brief interruption in fluoxetine and paroxetine treatment. International Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2002;17(5):217-225. Pubmed link

This study was conducted to understand the effects of a shorter treatment interruption of SSRIs (fluoxetine and paroxetine), that is 3-5 days, which has implications for when patients miss taking their medication. Results indicate that there was a significant increase in adverse events (as measured by the Discontinuation Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) scale) reported by the paroxetine but not the fluoxetine group. Stopping ADM also had negative clinical (return of depression) and quality of life implication for the paroxetine but not the fluoxetine group. The depression scores increased as a result of an increase in somatic symptoms upon ADM interruption.

19) Viguera AC, Baldessarini RJ, Friedberg J. Discontinuing antidepressant treatment in major depression. Harvard Review Of Psychiatry. 1998;5(6):293-306. Pubmed link

This literature review summarizes the results of 27 studies on long-term ADM use and effects after discontinuation of the medication. Results indicate that discontinuing treatment leads to higher rates of monthly relapse rates, shorter time to relapse and higher risk of relapse on a yearly basis. Also slower rates of discontinuation did not lead to a lower relapse risk. Lastly being on a maintenance dose for longer after being stabilized with ADM did not protect participants from a lower relapse rate one ADM was discontinued. This goes against the conventional wisdom that patients need to be on a maintenance dose for several months after acute symptoms have remitted.

20) Verbeek-Heida PM, Mathot EF. Better safe than sorry–why patients prefer to stop using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants but are afraid to do so: results of a qualitative study. Chronic Illness. 2006;2(2):133-142. Pubmed link

In this qualitative study the authors interviewed 16 SSRI users (range of use: 6 months to 10 years) to understand their decision making around continuing or stopping their medication. A subset of 9 patients had attempted to discontinue their medication in consultation with their physician, but all had been unsuccessful (the experience upon stopping is not described) and had re-started the drugs. Another relevant theme was that patients received conflicting advice from physicians which made them err toward continuing rather than discontinuing the medication.

21) Bahrick AS. Persistence of sexual dysfunction side effects after discontinuation of antidepressant medications: Emerging evidence. The Open Psychology Journal. 2008;1.

The author summarizes evidence from the literature on the occurrence of sexual side effects that persist long after stopping SSRIs. She notes that a great deal of evidence on this phenomenon emerged outside the professional community, from consumer reports on internet communities. Implications for prescribing and non-prescribing psychologists are discussed.

22) Valuck RJ, Orton HD, Libby AM. Antidepressant discontinuation and risk of suicide attempt: a retrospective, nested case-control study. Journal Of Clinical Psychiatry. 2009;70(8):1069-77. Pubmed link

This study compared a group of individuals who had been diagnosed with depression to a group of individuals who had been diagnosed with depression and attempted suicide. Relevant to discontinuation, the authors found that the first 2 weeks after stopping an ADM is a time for increased risk for suicide as well, whereas using AD was found to be a protective factor. Initiation of AD therapy was associated with the highest rate of suicide attempt, followed by phases where doses were reduced or increased. Also individuals who attempted suicide were more likely to use ADM and have multiple occurrences of depressive episodes.

23) Csoka AB, Shipko S. Persistent sexual side effects after SSRI discontinuation. Psychotherapy And Psychosomatics. 2006;75(3):187-188. Pubmed link

In this paper the authors present 3 cases where patients experienced persistent sexual dysfunction several years after discontinuing their ADM. Some potential hypotheses to explain this phenomenon are discussed.

24) Csoka AB, Bahrick A, Mehtonen O-P. Persistent sexual dysfunction after discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Journal Of Sexual Medicine. 2008;5(1):227-233. Pubmed link

In this paper the authors present 3 cases where patients experienced persistent sexual dysfunction several years after discontinuing their ADM. These 3 were chosen out of 1300 individuals who self-identified as having sexual problems post SSRI discontinuation. The findings are discussed in light of the changes that SSRIs produce in various systems that do not seem to renormalize upon discontinuing the medication.

25) Green, B. Persistent Adverse Neurological Effects Following SSRI Discontinuation (PANES). Psychiatry on-line. 2000. Available at http://www.priory.com/psych/panes.htm#discussion.

This brief report described four patients on SSRIs who all suffered prolonged neurological symptoms for months after discontinuing their medication. All patients were on drugs that affect the reuptake of serotonin despite being structurally dissimilar and having different mechanisms of action. The authors speculate that this may be responsible for the persistent neurological symptoms observed despite stopping the medication.

26) Bolton JM, Sareen J, Reiss JP. Genital anaesthesia persisting six years after sertraline discontinuation. Journal Of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2006;32(4):327-30 Pubmed link

This paper describes a case study of a 26-year-old man who experienced a sexual side-effect during active use and 6 years after discontinuation of the ADM sertraline, even as his mood remained stable. The authors hypothesize the cause of this persistent dysfunction a) may be related to psychological reasons or b) the sertraline led to long-term functional changes in the brain that did not reverse. The patient believed that his symptoms were an effect of the sertraline.

27) Kauffman, RP Murdock, A. Prolonged post-treatment genital anesthesia and sexual dysfunction following discontinuation of citalopram and the atypical antidepressant nefazodone. The Open Women’s Health Journal. 2007, 1: 1-3.

This paper describes a case of a 32-year-old woman who experienced sexual side effects during 4 weeks of treatment with an SSRI, citalopram which led to switching to nefazodone. Even though her depression symptoms remained in remission, the sexual side effects persisted even after a year of stopping all medication. Possible reasons for this phenomenon are discussed.

28) Sabljić V, Ružić K, Rakun R. Venlafaxine withdrawal syndrome. Psychiatria Danubina. 2011;23(1):117-9. Pubmed link.

Abrupt venlafaxine discontinuation involves a high risk of withdrawal syndrome. Mechanism of its development is similar to that of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), but of higher intensity. Venlafaxine withdrawal symptoms may include several somatic symptoms as well as several psychiatric symptoms. In some cases, symptoms may look like a stroke. A treatment option is re-inclusion of venlafaxine or a SSRI antidepressant.

29) Wang J, Greenberg H. Status cataplecticus precipitated by abrupt withdrawal of venlafaxine. Journal Of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2013;9(7):715-6. Pubmed link

A case study of a narcoleptic patient who developed status cataplecticus after abrupt withdrawal of venlafaxine.

30) Pinzani V, Giniès E, Robert L, Peyrière H, Abbar M, Blayac JP. Venlafaxine withdrawal syndrome: report of six cases and review of the literature. La Revue De Médecine Interne 2000;21(3):282-4. Pubmed link

A case study of six patients who developed withdrawal syndromes after discontinuing venlafaxine.

31) Rosenbaum J, Zajecka J. Clinical Management of Antidepressant Discontinuation. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1997; 58, suppl. 7, 37-40. Pubmed link

To minimize the symptoms of antidepressant discontinuation, gradual tapering is necessary for all serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) except fluoxetine, which has an extended half-life. Discontinuation symptoms, which frequently emerge after abrupt discontinuation or intermittent non-compliance and, less frequently, during dose reduction, are generally mild, short-lived, and self-limiting but can be distressing and may lead to missed work days and decreased productivity. The symptoms may be somatic (e.g., dizziness and light-headedness; nausea and vomiting; fatigue, lethargy, myalgia, chills, and other flu-like symptoms; sensory and sleep disturbances) or psychological (anxiety and/or agitation, crying spells, irritability).

32) El-Mallakh RS, Gao Y, Jeannie Roberts R. Tardive dysphoria: the role of long term antidepressant use in-inducing chronic depression. Medical Hypotheses. 2011;76(6):769-773. Pubmed link

The authors propose a model of tardive dysphoria, which is a potentially chronic depressive state that develops in some individuals who have been using ADM over a longer period of time. Discontinuation of ADM may lead to a gradual improvement in symptoms some people, but in others the chronic state of depression may be permanent and irreversible. A genetic explanation linked to a serotonin transporter gene for this phenomenon is provided. The authors conclude by stating the need for randomized control trials to test the existence of tardive dysphoria. They state that discontinuation may be more likely to be beneficial for those who have had briefer exposure to ADM, have greater brain neuroplasticity and have the long form on the serotonin transporter gene.

33) El-Mallakh RS, Karippot A. Antidepressant-associated chronic irritable dysphoria (ACID) in bipolar disorder: a case series. J Affect Disord 2005;84:267–72. Pubmed link

A case study of six bipolar patients who developed a chronic dysphoric mood, irritability and middle insomnia, which is associated with occupational and social dysfunction, after receiving antidepressants for three years. Discontinuation of antidepressants was associated with a slow and gradual improvement in these symptoms over the ensuing year.

34) Fava GA, Gotti A, Belaise C, Guidi J, Offidani E. Withdrawal Symptoms after Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Discontinuation: A Systematic Review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 2015;84 (2):72-81. Full Text.

A systematic review of the research literature for studies that reported on SSRI withdrawal symptoms. These studies showed that discontinuation symptoms typically occur within a few days following discontinuation and last a few weeks. This occurs with gradual tapering too. However, patient experiences are variable, and some may experience late onset of discontinuation symptoms, or disturbances that persist. Such withdrawal symptoms are often misidentified as signs of impending relapse.
Relapse Upon Discontinuation

35) Baldessarini RJ, Tondo L, Ghiani C, et al. Illness Risk Following Rapid Versus Gradual Discontinuation of Antidepressants. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2010;167(8):934-941. Pubmed link

In this naturalistic study patients on ADM were taken off their medication either rapidly (1-7 days) or gradually (over 14 days or more). Results indicate that rapid discontinuation leads not only to early withdrawal or physiological symptoms, but also to a quicker return of a new episode of depression or panic. They also found a link between a drug’s half life and recurrence of illness. They conclude that gradual dose tapering may be especially beneficial when discontinuing older antidepressants and those with shorter half-lives. However, since physiological discontinuation reactions are linked with drugs that act on the serotonin system, they recommend gradual dose tapering for all ADMs.

Tapering Speed

Tapering to be customized for a patient depending on the half life of the ADM being used as well as the dose. The general rule is that drugs with shorter half lives need a longer taper period. Another factor that impacts speed of taper is the dose the patient has been taking. Most guideline documents say “reduce dose gradually” over a certain number of weeks depending on the ADM but do tend not to specify exactly what gradual means.

36) Keks N, Hope J, Keogh S. Switching and stopping antidepressants. Australian Prescriber. 2016;39(3):76-83. Pubmed link

The authors recommend stopping ADMs over 4 weeks at least, but mention other factors that need to be taken into consideration when making this decision. They provide tables listing the approximate half-lives of ADMs, general techniques for switching between ADMs and guidelines for switching between specific ADMs.

37) Khan A, Musgnung J, Ramey T, et al. Abrupt discontinuation compared with a 1-week taper regimen in depressed outpatients treated for 24 weeks with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d. Journal Of Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2014;34(3):365-368. Pubmed link

This controlled clinical trial was conducted to assess if there were any differences in the emergence of discontinuations symptoms with an abrupt versus a taper protocol. The control group continued taking the medication as usual. The taper protocol switched patients to 25 mg/d for one week after 24 weeks of treatment with 50 mg/d, followed by a placebo for 3 weeks. Symptoms or adverse events after stopping the medication were measured using the Discontinuation Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) scale. The authors conclude that even though there were more absolute adverse events reported by patients in the abrupt taper group compared to the taper group, this difference was not statistically significant.

38) Ogle NR, Akkerman SR. Guidance for the discontinuation or switching of antidepressant therapies in adults. Journal Of Pharmacy Practice. 2013;26(4):389-396. Pubmed link

This is a guidance document based on evaluation of the literature and is intended as a guide for clinicians or other healthcare professionals in their management of patients who want to stop or switch their ADM (see Tables 1 and 2). They note that package inserts for ADMs warn of withdrawal risk but do not provide details about how to taper. They also mention that there is very little evaluation of the data presented and the source documents provide varied information.

39) Phelps J. Tapering antidepressants: is 3 months slow enough? Medical Hypotheses. 2011;77(6):1006-1008. Pubmed link

This study was designed to test a new drug for the treatment of cataplexy (a sleep-related disorder) which has a history of being treated with ADM. This necessitated stopping the ADM patients were taking. Control participants were patients who had never taken ADM. The author concluded based on the higher number of weekly cataplexy attacks for the ADM group that longer taper rates for ADM may be warranted. He proposes discontinuing over 4 months at a rate of 25% reduction per month or 12.5% every 2 weeks. However, he says, this needs further systematic study.

40) Fava M, Rosenbaum JF, Hoog SL, et al. A comparison of symptoms following treatment interruption: Evidence from a randomized, double-blind trial with fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine. European Neuropsychopharmacology 8:S171-S172

This controlled trial followed a protocol where ADM was stopped for 4-6 day periods in a group of patients who had responded to 4-10 weeks of treatment. Adverse events measured using checklists and spontaneous reporting by patients. Results indicate that brief interruption of SSRI treatment results in new or worse adverse events. The frequency of adverse events was greatest for paroxetine, followed by sertraline and lastly fluoxetine.

41) Pringsheim T, Kelly M, Barbui C. Stopping antidepressants following depression. BMJ 2016;352. Pubmed link

This is a 10-minute consultation guide for practitioners. It follows NICE guidelines in recommending ADM to be taperered over 4 weeks if the patient has been well for 6-12 months. If discontinuation symptoms occur they recommend tapering over a longer period, but do not specify how much longer.

42) Tint A, Haddad PM, Anderson IM. The effect of rate of antidepressant tapering on the incidence of discontinuation symptoms: a randomised study. Journal Of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England). 2008;22(3):330-332. Pubmed link

This study compared the emergence of SSRI discontinuation on tapering the medication over 3 versus 14 days. Results indicate that there were more adverse events reported upon quicker taper, but these results were not significant. However, the half-life of the drug is an important consideration – drugs with shorter half lives need to be tapered more slowly, especially because of the possibility of increased depressive and suicidal symptoms when SSRIs are discontinued.

43) Kaymaz, N., et al. (2008). Evidence that patients with single versus recurrent depressive episodes are differentially sensitive to treatment discontinuation: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. The Journal Of Clinical Psychiatry 69(9): 1423-1436. Pubmed link

This review of 30 trials (4890 patients) was conducted to understand what moderates the effect of the finding that ADM prevents the occurrence of relapse after remission from an episode of depression. Relapse rates were found to be greater in patients with recurring episodes of depression. The mode of discontinuation of ADM had an effect on this group, but not single episode patients. The authors found that acute withdrawal was more likely to lead to relapse in recurrent episode patients. Acute withdrawal was not as relevant for single episode patients. The authors conclude that the recommendation that patients should be treated for at least 6 months after achieving remission or that patients with more frequent episodes should receive maintenance treatment is not supported based on these findings. They recommend gradual discontinuation of ADM in general, to manage withdrawal symptoms.

44) Rothschild, Anthony J. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor-Induced Sexual Dysfunction: Efficacy of a Drug Holiday. The American Journal of Psychiatry 152.10 (1995): 1514-6. ProQuest. Web. 2 Sep. 2016. Pubmed link

This study was conducted on a group of 30 outpatients who experienced sexual dysfunction upon taking SSRIs to assess whether a “drug holiday” or brief break from medication would lead to improved sexual functioning. ADM was stopped for 4 weekends from Thursday to Sunday. Results indicate that sexual functioning improved in patients taking sertraline and paroxetine, but not fluoxetine. The authors presume this is because of the shorter half lives of sertraline and paroxetine compared to fluoxetine. There were no statistically significant increases in depression scores across all patients.

44) Fava GA, Bernardi M, Tomba E, Rafanelli C. Effects of gradual discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in panic disorder with agoraphobia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2007;10:835–8.
 Pubmed link

In a study of 20 remitted patients, antidepressants were tapered at the slowest possible pace and with appropriate patient education. Nine of the 20 patients (45%) experienced a discontinuation syndrome, which subsided within a month in all but three patients who had been taking paroxetine for a long time. Discontinuation syndromes appeared to be fairly common even when performed with slow tapering and during clinical remission. In some cases disturbances persisted for months after discontinuation. 



Thank You Ms Aswani and MIA.

Previous articleWithdrawal from ADHD Medications

GOP Invokes Nuclear Option To Confirm Justice Gorsuch To SCOTUS

weaselzippers



Will wonders never cease?

Democrats started it in 2013. Good on GOP for finishing it now.
WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans invoked the “nuclear option” Thursday, overturning the body’s rules so Neil Gorsuch could be confirmed to the Supreme Court with a simple majority vote.
The vote — entirely along party lines — was 52 to make the change and 48 against.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said the change — from 60 to 51 votes — was necessary to break a Democratic filibuster intended to block the Colorado appellate judge.
“This will be the first — and last — partisan filibuster of a Supreme Court nomination,” McConnell said of the history-making step.
Keep reading…


Democrats Block Gorsuch Setting Up Nuclear Response

Thank You New York Post and Nick. 

Color us thunderstruck.

We're actually going to get a Real Judge on the Supreme Court?

The GOP actually found a spine?