Shouldn’t she be protecting us from Muslims?
Via Daily Wire:
Thank You Zip and Daily Wire.The day after a horrific shooting spree by a “radicalized” Muslim man and his partner in San Bernardino, California, Attorney General Loretta Lynch pledged to a group of Muslim activists that she would take aggressive action against anyone who used “anti-Muslim rhetoric” that “edges toward violence.”Speaking to the audience at the Muslim Advocate’s 10th anniversary dinner Thursday, Lynch said her “greatest fear” is the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric” in America and vowed to prosecute any guilty of what she deemed violence-inspiring speech. She said:The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence. My message to not just the Muslim community but to the entire American community is: we cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on.Assuring the pro-Muslim group that “we stand with you,” Lynch said she would use her Justice Department to protect Muslims from “violence” and discrimination.
And if you subscribe to this magazine and its Editorial Twerkings, feel free to let it loose. Obama's AG is interested in prosecuting you for "Anti Muslim" speech this week, not calling someone a seditious, Eff-ing idiot.
New Yorker Mag's Next Cover: Blame American Gun Owners For Islamic Terrorism
This is particularly odious, after a terrorist attack, to paint American gun owners as evil.
Obviously, there is no supermarket where you can get guns, milk and grenades. Ordinary people don’t have access to grenades. And of course, evil white people stocking up on guns.
But perhaps I should cut the New Yorker a break, maybe they are implying this is what is needed to fight Islamic terrorism?
Thank You Nick.