dailycaller Peter HassonAssociate Editor 9:17 PM 11/03/2017 Unfortunately we're going to have to excerpt this one, but the link is there for you. There are embeds to Scribd docs. We don't have the required to access subscription to Scribd, BUT, you can use the magnify function to check through them.
Here's Mr Hasson's opening. "Major American foundations have given millions of dollars in funding to Islamic organizations accused of having ties to radical Islamist movements or designated terrorist organizations and a group of activists are trying to convince them to stop.
Groups like Islamic Relief Worldwide, which some countries have banned for allegedly funding Hamas and other terrorist organizations, have received millions of dollars from corporate charities like the GE Foundation, community foundations like the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, and independent foundations like George Soros’ Open Society Foundation. (RELATED: Soros Transfers $18 BILLION To His Open Society Foundations)
Researchers with the Middle East Forum, an activist group devoted to promoting American interests abroad, identified the financial stream from American foundations to seven Islamic groups with radical ties: Islamic Relief Worldwide and its sister organization in the United States — Islamic Relief USA, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Muslim American Society (MAS), the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) and, despite rebounding from highly damaging terrorist allegations in 2008, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
The various foundations have given $5.8 million to these seven groups since 2000, IRS filings show, with $5.6 million of that taking place since 2008.
In total, 46 corporate foundations, eight community foundations, nine private foundations and one donor-advised fund have given money to these seven groups.
The MEF researchers tried — with very limited success — to privately persuade every foundation on the list to cease giving money to the seven groups, before sharing their findings exclusively with TheDC. In the interest of transparency, TheDC included the entire list of donations — with accompanying documentation — at the bottom of this article."
(CNSNews.com) - Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), a member of the intelligence committee, said on Sunday that she’s spent a lot of time on North Korea. “I have read most, if not all, of the intelligence, and the real intelligence,” she told CNN’s “State of the Union.”
And she said she is concerned about the threat posed by a rogue nation with a nuclear arsenal: “We know that they can hit anywhere within the United States now,” Feinstein said.
“How concerned are you about the United States and the safety of the United States?” CNN’s Dana Bash asked Feinstein:
“How concerned are you about the United States and the safety of the United States?” CNN’s Dana Bash asked Feinstein:
Well, I am concerned about the safety of the United States. Our missile defense isn't perfect. It certainly leaves more to be desired. And it has to really be worked on to be improved. And we know that they can hit anywhere within the United States now.
And they have done this in a relatively short time. And this particular leader, over his father, has moved much more quickly. And it's been effective. The science apparently is good, because they have been able put together tests that are successful.
The Trump administration has insisted there will be no talks with North Korea until it ends its nuclear program, but Feinstein said she doesn’t think that is the right approach:
I have spent a lot of time on Intelligence looking at North Korea. I have read most, if not all, of the intelligence, and the real intelligence.
I think that North Korea is not going to give up its program with nothing on the table. I think that what could happen is that we could have reliable verification of a freeze of both the nuclear program and the missile arsenal, and that we could conceivably talk China into supporting that kind of a freeze, because it would carry with it no regime change and no war.
Feinstein expressed concern about North Korea's “recklessness":
“They now have very powerful weapons. They have done six nuclear tests. They have big missiles. And they have missiles that can carry a nuclear threat.”
Thank You Ms Jones and CNS.
Wonderful. Who was behind the Korean war and the Vietnam war?
Think real hard on this the next time (which is practically Every time) you're forced to buy something/anything/almost Everything, Made In China.