Where were these '"Save The Children" types when Lego was whoring JNJ's Risperdal?
It was fine to use Lego toys to sell lobotomies to very young children, but not toy guns and light sabers?
It’s come to this.
In what may be a sad reflection of society as a whole, a new study has found Legos have become increasingly more violent in the last 30 years.
The study, conducted by the University of Canterbury, looked at the numberweapons included in Lego kits produced since 1978 (the first year weapons were available) and the perceived violence in imagery created by the company. It found an “exponential increases of violence over time” in both categories.
While the iconic, brightly colored toy blocks have existed since 1949, the first weapons weren’t introduced until 1978, when a castle kit included “a sword, a halberd, and a lance.”
The number of Lego weapons overall has increased greatly since then. Researchers found that nearly 30 percent of all Lego sets sold today now include at least one weapon. In 1978, that figure was under 5 percent.
The researchers only looked at smaller, pre-manufactured weapons that are one brick large (guns, cannons, swords, etc.) and excluded larger weapons that have to be assembled.
That means the Death Star — which by conventional standards is “certainly a weapon,” the study concedes — isn’t included in the total weapons count. The light saber introduced in the “Star Wars” kit, however, is considered a weapon.
The study also looked at imagery produced by Lego that accompanies the sets, and found it has become more violent as well.
Today, close to 40 percent of all the images in the Lego catalog contain some sort of violence, the study found, with the fastest growth occurring in cases of shooting.
HT: Michelle Malkin
Thank You HuffPo, Ms Malkin, and Zip.
As for the psychological linkers, take your asinine, humanist, collectivist theories up with Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, and Roger Rabbit.