Prozac In The Tower Of Babel

The Bonkers Institute For Nearly Genuine Research has;

The Many Faces Of Prozac

The Multiplicity of AKAs begs the obvious Why? Unless of course the obvious answer that the makers don't want all the rotten press their chemical gets Everywhere it lands to become more widely known, since those different names must be different drugs, and therefore people falling apart from Prozac in America shouldn't worry those people falling apart from it in some Other name in some Other country.

But, Wherever on the planet your home Is, and whatever language some 100% Incompetent FRAUD offers to Poison you with this virulent NEUROTOXIN in, whether it's "Hapilux" in Greece & Thailand, "Courage" in Indonesia or "Reconcile" at the Vets in Philly, .......

Here's what you, your children, parents and family dog are Really buying, ...... under Any name.

http://psychroachesadverseevent.blogspot.com/2009/03/prozac-adverse-reactions.html

Top 20 Prozac side effects reported to MedWatch between Jan. 2004 and Dec. 2006:

Completed Suicide - 187 cases
Depression - 166 cases
Drug Ineffective - 161cases
Anxiety - 117 cases
Drug Interaction - 113 cases
Suicidal Ideation - 113 cases
Agitation - 101 cases
Condition Aggravated - 87 cases
Nausea - 79 cases
Feeling Abnormal - 77 cases
Headache - 77 cases
Insomnia - 72 cases
Tremor - 72 cases
Serotonin Syndrome - 70 cases
Somnolence - 68 cases
Suicide Attempt - 68 cases
Overdose - 67 cases
Confusional State - 65 cases
Aggression - 64 cases

Hyponatraemia - 63 cases

And those numbers are Only the infinitesimal number of cases that Anyone bothered to report.

If this stuff were Really as good as the makers and pushers Claim it is, ..... Why aren't they pushing for global brand recognition to boost sales under One, Consolidated Name?

Ya don't suppose that the actual TRACK RECORD of screwing up a person's Serotonin levels might have anything to do with it, do ya?

SSRISTORIES.com

58 School Shootings/Incidents Involving SSRIs

Most of the stories on this site describe events that occurred after the year 2000. The increase in online news material and the efficiency of search engines has greatly increased the ability to track stories. Even these 4,400+ documented stories only represent the tip of an iceberg since most stories do not make it into the media. There are 77 cases of bizarre behavior, 58 school shootings/incidents, 68 road rage tragedies, 18 air rage incidents, 70 postpartum depression cases, over 1,000 murders (homicides) or murder attempts, over 300 murder-suicides (30% committed by women) and other acts of violence including workplace violence on this site. There are also over 100 Journal Articles and FDA reports listed in the Index. They are at the top of the Index immediately below the 58 school shootings/incidents and the 23 "won" cases.

Because you see, no matter How unhappy, depressed, or even downright Goth, (Sweet Jeezus! That kid's wearing - gasp - black clothes! Get him some Mental Health, Quick!) Any of those kids were, Nobody got shot until After those kids were "Diagnosed" by Supra Science,

and poisoned, by Avaricious Svengalis who Have Never Cured, and Will Never Cure, ........ anything.

American Citizen Dragged Off For FORCED ELECTROCUTION In Minnesota

Mindfreedom.org has;

Elizabeth Ellis Back In Institution, At Risk Of "Months" Of "Maintenance Forced Electroshock"

Elizabeth Ellis, 67, is back in a psychiatric institution. Elizabeth had been living peacefully at home with her husband in Moorhead, Minnesota. Last month she stayed home rather than have another involuntary court-ordered outpatient electroshock. Two days ago, Minnesota mental health officials threatened to transport her to an institution for "months" of forced "maintenance" electroshocks. URGENT ACTION: Contact Elizabeth's elected federal officials.

Elizabeth K. Ellis, 67, of Moorhead, Minnesota: Forced outpatient electroshock survivor.

Alert3 - 18 February 2011

Out of her home, back in an institution, for saying "no" to electroshock!

Document Reveals: Elizabeth Ellis Faces "Months" of "Maintenance" Forced Electroshock

Tonight, MindFreedom was informed by Susan Opp, the daughter of Elizabeth Ellis, that Elizabeth has been placed back inside a psychiatric institution.

This is exactly what Elizabeth and her advocates have feared.

Elizabeth Ellis, 67, had been living peacefully in her own home, with her husband Robert, during January, but was under court-order to report for regular involuntary electroconvulsive therapy or ECT.

On 27 January, Elizabeth stayed home instead of reporting for the procedure. As she feared, she has lost her liberty.

Urgent Action to Stop Elizabeth's Forced Electroshock

Because the Minn. Governor's office has been non-responsive to citizen concerns about Elizabeth for three weeks, advocates in Minnesota ask concerned people to contact Elizabeth's elected US Congresspeople.

Email and phone civil but strong messages to the below three elected officials with this message, in your own words:

"Please investigate the well being of Elizabeth Ellis of Moorhead, Minnesota, who refused to leave her home for another involuntary outpatient electroshock. Institute an immediate ban on forced ECT, which an FDA panel has called hazardous and untested. See the MindFreedom.org web site for more information."

US Sen. Al Franken:

• Web form: http://www.franken.senate.gov/?p=email_al

• Phone St. Paul office: (651) 221-1016

U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar: http://www.klobuchar.senate.gov/emailamy.cfm

U.S. Rep Collin Peterson: http://www.collinpeterson.house.gov/contact.html

Note: To use the web form, you need a district zipcode. You can write your note 'c/o Elizabeth Ellis' and use her address:

606 20TH AVE S

MOORHEAD MN 56560

You may now visit a "Elizabeth Campaign Gateway" for the latest updates and news here:

http://www.mindfreedom.org/elizabeth

.

We Are All Elizabeth!

Elizabeth was afraid this would happen, and knew she was threatened with "months" of forced electroshock.

Two days ago, on 16 February, Elizabeth received a court order threatening her with being forcibly transported from her home, mainly because she had refused to report for another court-ordered involuntary outpatient electroshock on 27 January 2011.

By coincidence, the very next day after that "sit in" at her own home, a Food & Drug Administration panel voted on 28 January 2011 that the ECT device is "hazardous," and should for the first time in its more than 70 years of use in the USA be tested for safety and efficacy by the FDA.

The court document Elizabeth received on 16 February stated that on Valentine's Day, 14 February 2011, Elizabeth's outpatient electroshock doctor - psychiatrist Nadeem Haider with a "shock shop" in nearby Fargo, North Dakota - told Elizabeth's case manager, Kirsten Wegenast, that "she be hospitalized, and that she remain in the hospital for several months and establish a consistent maintenance ECT schedule."

Perhaps because of the growing controversy, Dr. Haider also asked Ms. Wegenast - according to her report - that after Elizabeth's discharge, a clinic other than his own, preferably based in Minnesota, be found to do future outpatient electroshocks.

Elizabeth is a retired teacher and school counselor, with a master's degree in counseling. She personally faxed MindFreedom this document and others, because of the risk to her liberty.

In the Elizabeth Campaign Gateway you can find:

• A folder of this and other court and agency documents you can download about Elizabeth's forced electroshock, including the court order to transport her to a psychiatric institution for saying "no" to forced electroshock.
• A personal plea Elizabeth made two days ago after receiving her court notice that a Sheriff may pick her up "at any minute."
• An interview with Elizabeth on 12 Feb. on MindFreedom Free Web Radio.
• How to join a new Facebook Cause for Elizabeth.
• Learn how the day after Elizabeth refused her outpatient electroshock... an FDA panel voted that the device is "hazardous," and should finally be tested for safety and efficacy for the first time in 70 years!
• A blog entry by MindFreedom director David Oaks calls for the global mental health advocacy community to create a peaceful revolution like that in Egypt.
• And more...

Two days ago, on 16 February, Elizabeth told MindFreedom in an interview that she saw this coming:

"I have gotten the orders to 'revoke and transport.' I spoke with my public defender. He said the sheriff can come at any minute. My attorney has written an affidavit challenging the need to continue ECT. I also have an appointment with a new psychiatrist this weekend who supports my right to say 'no' to electroshock."

Said Elizabeth: "They claim they are trying to save my life. But maybe they are trying to save their image, now that they know I'm challenging them and I have an organization's backing."

Elizabeth added, "I'm in very good mental health. I'm active, eating, sleeping, doing everything. I'm in deep appreciation of MindFreedom for putting out alerts."

Her husband Robert (see photo of the couple above) agreed: "Elizabeth doesn't need electroshock. She's been fine, active. We've been doing things together. She's pretty sharp, but her memory is still off from the electroshock. I'm angry and upset about this court order for her to have forced outpatient electroshock."

For the latest info, check frequently at the Elizabeth Ellis Campaign Gateway.

Somebody needs to tell this Judge that Elizabeth's 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th & 8th Amendment Rights under the Constitution are being violated Wholesale.

And the 9th Amendment specifically Prohibits the States from Violating the 1st 8.

Disruptive"Mentally Ill" Physicians: STILL ABOVE THE LAW

February 18, 2011 — 1:58pm ET | By Sandra Yin

Fierce Healthcare has;

How To End Disruptive Behavior That Compromises Patient Safety

When faced with disruptive behavior, managers at hospitals and other healthcare facilities oftentimes will brush it under the rug. They're reluctant to deal with it, says Dr. Alan Rosenstein, medical director at Physician Wellness Services, which helps doctors with performance and behavioral issues. Rosenstein has written extensively on the topic of disruptive physicians.

Failing to confront the problem allows it to grow. A 2004 study by the American College of Physician Executives found that 70 percent of respondents said most problems involved repeat offenders.

The risks of not addressing bad behavior are significant. Taking the path of least resistance and doing nothing can not only compromise a person's ability to do a job and lower staff morale, it also can potentially harm the patient. A physician could end up on TV as the target of a malpractice suit.

Since the landmark Institute of Medicine report, To Err is Human, was published in 2000, much has been said about the need for the right systems and processes to improve patient safety. While human factors deserve far more attention than they tend to receive, though, it seems that no one ever wants to talk about them.

Hospitals fail to address behavioral problems, in part, because not everyone knows what disruptive behavior is. Some physicians see disruptive behavior as physical assault, while dismissing yelling and screaming as such. Others can overreact to the latter. Ultimately, there's a fine line, especially in the case of yelling. You have to distinguish when barked out orders are warranted. Perhaps a patient's care is on the verge of being compromised and someone had to take charge.

Dangerous behavior isn't always loud, nor does it necessarily have to involve overtly abusive language. In fact, one passive aggressive approach is to not respond at all to questions, or to withhold important information, David Danielson told me. Danielson is senior executive vice president and chief administrative officer for Sanford Clinic, which has over 340 physicians and more than 120 clinic sites in the Upper Midwest.

When poor behavior or interpersonal skills begin to interfere with another person's ability to think or do their job, it can affect patient care. Case in point, a physician doesn't return calls, or when he does, tends to be abrupt or antagonistic. People will not want to call that physician. A nurse's reluctance to make the call to a physician about a change in a patient's condition and resulting delays could lead to a compromise patient safety. (Note: Nurses too can be chronic disruptors.)

The good news is that in most interventions, it's enough to just sit down and tell the physician what happens when they behave a certain way, said Danielson. Show them how it affects other people and patients. Most people don't know the extent of their impact on another or downstream on patient care.

"They self correct," Rosenstein said. "When you show them the downstream effect of something bad happening to the patient, that's a wake-up call."

An informal discussion with the individual is one way to probe for underlying causes. Some offenders may be dealing with stress or burnout. Chronic offenders may benefit from stress management, anger management or diversity training. Others may need more intensive counseling, especially if something like substance abuse is involved.

Seven things organizations can do to prevent disruptive behavior from putting patient safety at risk include:

• Using a mediator who has no hiring or firing authority. People will open up more. And make sure any discussion of behavior does not come off as a witch hunt.
• Ensuring your organization has a disruptive behavior policy that doctors sign upon re-credentialing.
• Finding a champion for this, perhaps the chief medical officer or VP or medical affairs. A clinical head who aims to both improve staff relations and clinical outcomes could make a difference.
• Creating a reporting mechanism and formal process for reviewing incidents.
• Providing educational programs to define disruptive behavior and its impact. This will raise the level of awareness.
• Offering sensitivity training, conflict management, stress management and improving overall communication skills.
• Adding more behavioral expectations into your orientations.

Even if your hospital or healthcare organization doesn't have much in place right now to discourage disruptive behavior, it's never too late to get started. It's one way to make your care more patient-centered. -

Read more: How to end disruptive behavior that compromises patient safety - FierceHealthcare http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/story/how-end-disruptive-behavior-compromises-patient-safety/2011-02-18#ixzz1ELDRFYaf
Subscribe: http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/signup?sourceform=Viral-Tynt-FierceHealthcare-FierceHealthcare

Here's how you address the Problem. Enforce the LAW.

Either Psychiatrically Diagnose these Physicians, FOR LIFE, Brain Bash them with their own Brain Eating Antipsychotics and Set Them Up with Life Time Police Registration - because Physicians 'Behavioral' medications are So Destructive that they CREATE a Homicide Risk - REVOKE their Licenses and Declare them Incurably Mentally Ill, ..... or Get Rid of those medications and the Baloney-Science Based, Behavioral Medicine Frauds who peddle them.

Amendment 14 US Constitution

Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

67 Year Old Woman Refuses ECT Shock: Judge Says "Drag Her In!"

Mindfreedom.org has;

Court Orders Elizabeth Ellis to be Taken From Her Home for Refusing Forced Outpatient Electroshock

A judge has asked the Sheriff to pick up Elizabeth Ellis, 67, living peacefully at home with her husband in Moorhead, Minnesota, and bring her to a psychiatric institution. The main reason? Elizabeth refused to report last month for another involuntary court-ordered outpatient electroshock. Support a grassroots campaign to phone Minnesota's new governor at 651-201-3400.

Elizabeth K. Ellis, 67, of Moorhead, Minnesota: Forced outpatient electroshock survivor.

Alert2 - 16 February 2011

"Elizabeth may be picked up any minute."

Stop the Forced Electroshock of Elizabeth Ellis!

URGENT ACTION:

Join a phone-in to office of Minn. Governor Mark Dayton at

651-201-3400

Your message in your own words: "What is your office doing to stop the involuntary outpatient electroshock of Elizabeth Ellis and others? Why have your staff not responded to MindFreedom?"

MindFreedom International director David Oaks said:

"Join me in peacefully flooding the Governor's office with calls every day. Be civil and strong, but do not give up, until this new Governor speaks up and takes action.

"For nearly three weeks, we've heard nothing back from the Governor's staff. Now it's an emergency! The mental health industry needs an 'Egyptian' moment! Phone now! 651-201-3400!"

Latest News Updates about Elizabeth Campaign:

You may now visit a new "Elizabeth Campaign Gateway" for the latest updates and news here:

http://www.mindfreedom.org/elizabeth

An international campaign has sprung up to help Elizabeth and her husband say "No!" to her forced outpatient electroshock.

In the new Elizabeth Campaign Gateway you can find:

• A folder of court and agency documents you can download about Elizabeth's forced electroshock, including the new court order to transport her to a psychiatric institution for saying "no" to forced electroshock.
• A personal plea Elizabeth made today after receiving her court notice that a Sheriff may pick her up.
• An interview with Elizabeth on 12 Feb. on MindFreedom Free Web Radio.
• How to join a new Facebook Cause for Elizabeth.
• Learn how the same week Elizabeth refused her outpatient electroshock... an FDA panel voted that the device is "hazardous," and should finally be tested for safety and efficacy for the first time in 70 years!
• A blog entry by MindFreedom director David Oaks calls for the global mental health advocacy community to create a peaceful revolution like that in Egypt.
• And more...

Elizabeth told the MindFreedom office in an interview today:

"I have gotten the orders to 'revoke and transport.' I spoke with my public defender. He said the sheriff can come at any minute. My attorney has written an affidavit challenging the need to continue ECT. I also have an appointment with a new psychiatrist this weekend who supports my right to say 'no' to electroshock."

Said Elizabeth: "They claim they are trying to save my life. But maybe they are trying to save their image, now that they know I'm challenging them and I have an organization's backing."

Elizabeth added, "I'm in very good mental health. I'm active, eating, sleeping, doing everything. I'm in deep appreciation of MindFreedom for putting out alerts."

Her husband Robert (see photo of the couple above) agreed: "Elizabeth doesn't need electroshock. She's been fine, active. We've been doing things together. She's pretty sharp, but her memory is still off from the electroshock. I'm angry and upset about this court order for her to have forced outpatient electroshock."

For the latest info, check frequently at the Elizabeth Ellis Campaign Gateway.

Related content

• Elizabeth Ellis Campaign: Stop Her Forced Outpatient Electroshock

Document Actions

• Send this
• Print this

Ok, in 1975 the Supreme Court had This to say: O'Connor v. Donaldson

O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975), was a landmark decision in mental health law. The United States Supreme Court ruled that states cannot confine citizens to an institution (or similar) without treatment if they are non-dangerous and capable of living by themselves, or with the aid of responsible family or friends, and that involuntary hospitalization and/or treatment violates an individual's civil rights, unless the individual is exhibiting behavior that is a danger to themselves or others. Also, if involuntary hospitalization and/or treatment is allowed, the hold must be for evaluation only and a court order must be received for more than very short term treatment or hospitalization (typically no longer than 72 hours), and the treatment must take place in the least restrictive setting possible. This ruling has severely limited involuntary treatment and hospitalization in the United States; however, the statutes vary somewhat from state to state. ^{[1] [2]} Kenneth Donaldson (confined patient) had been held for 15 years in Florida State Hospital at Chattahoochee, due to needs of "care, maintenance, and treatment". He filed a lawsuit against the hospital and staff members claiming they had robbed him of his constitutional rights, by confining him against his will. Donaldson won his case (including monetary damages) in United States District Court, won the appeals, and in 1975 the victory was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court.

A finding of "mental illness" alone cannot justify a State's locking a person up against their will and keeping them indefinitely in simple custodial confinement. Assuming that that term can be given a reasonably precise content and that the "mentally ill" can be identified with reasonable accuracy, (???) there is still no constitutional basis for confining such persons involuntarily if they are dangerous to no one and can live safely in freedom.

“

May the State confine the mentally ill merely to ensure them a living standard superior to that they enjoy in the private community? That the State has a proper interest in providing care and assistance to the unfortunate goes without saying. But the mere presence of mental illness does not disqualify a person from preferring his home to the comforts of an institution. Moreover, while the State may arguably confine a person to save him from harm, incarceration is rarely if ever a necessary condition for raising the living standards of those capable of surviving safely in freedom, on their own or with the help of family or friends. May the State fence in the harmless mentally ill solely to save its citizens from exposure to those whose ways are different? One might as well ask if the State, to avoid public unease, could incarcerate all who are physically unattractive or socially eccentric. Mere public intolerance or animosity cannot constitutionally justify the deprivation of a person's physical liberty. In short, a State cannot constitutionally confine without more a nondangerous individual who is capable of surviving safely in freedom by himself or with the help of willing and responsible family members or friends. ...

"Mental Health Treatment" = You're 20 TIMES More Likely To Die

We've done this before. We'll do it again.

The 'Diagnosis' of "Mental Illness" remains a Political rather than Biologically Science based pursuit. Psychiatry's Bio-Science (which it's still peddling with a vengeance) is a FRAUD. Genetics, Chemical Imbalances & Brain Scans are all coming up Empty.

IF, ..... you submit to the FRAUD of Psychoanalysis you will be Paperworked into ever more severe underlying psychopathologies (which still don't Exist in an actual laboratory) due to the combined Analyst's need to get Paid, and the Behavioral Toxicity of the Drugs. And you Will be quacked into a Bipolar/Schizophrenic/Mood Disordered drooling wreck, ...... so that Francis & Dave & the rest of their Illuminati can keep reviewing movies.

Dr FG Lu Is An Illuminati: And Yes, He's Serious

The dreaded Schizophrenia itself, did not even exist until the Word itself was coined a century ago by Bleuler, who got suckered in Seances and performed his investigations of the heritability/genetics of behaviors in Saint Bernards. And Wiki's got him down for being a synesthete to boot, with his Own mis-wired brain.

Eugen Bleuler

"Bleuler is also recognized today for having a neurological condition called synesthesia, in which information from the sensory systems crosses over with the result that an individual experiences one sensation as another – tasting colours, hearing numbers or seeing music, for example."

Psychiatry today can't even make up its own mind as to what constitutes its 'Illnesses'.

Inside The Battle To Define Mental Illness

Its Bio-Based Treatments/Brain Bashings Will put you in an early grave: if not immediately then by taking 25 years off your life if you Stay on the drugs.

Its Schizophrenia drugs destroy Brain Tissue.

The More Drugs You're Given, The More Brain Tissue You Lose

So, with that in mind, here's a reminder from 2006, ..... 5 YEARS AGO.

AHRP has;

Comparison of Suicide Rates In TReated Schizophrenia Patients Found 20-Fold Increase

2006, and virtually Nothing has been done in terms of even instituting any type of Oversight over the American Psychiatric Association, much less getting rid of it, or its partners in drug company Store Front, like NAMI.

NAMI 81% Owned By The Chemical Cartels Who've Foisted The Fraud Of Psychiatry Upon You To Begin With

And those Chemical Makers who Own NAMI and the APA? Johnson & Johnson is at it again: recalling defective product:

Pharmalot has;

Another Johnson & Johnson Recall: 70,000 Syringes

full of Invega Sustenna Injectable Antipsychotic

And so, with apologies to our regular readers because we so love recalling this FACT: Even the publishers of Psychiatry's "Research Must Continue" - who are making a Handsome Profit Publishing that, ... ahhhm, ... "Research", ..... are calling Psychiatry on its, ..... "Research".

Medical Publishing Company Calls Bullshit

American Medicine has already been over run by the Political, junk science 'Behaviorists'. If you think this doesn't directly affect you, because You're not one of Their 1 in 5 who are suffering from an Incurable Mental Illness, ..... you need a refresher, ..... because it didn't directly affect (most of) the German people of 80 years ago either.


The Men Behind Hitler 4: The Secret Seizure Of Power