In The News October 22, 2015
A California jury ruled that Johnson
& Johnson’s Janssen Pharmaceutical and a psychiatrist are responsible for
the death of 25-year-old Leo Liu. During a clinical trial for Risperdal, Liu
died of a heart injury that was “further complicated” by the drug and ignored
by the study doctors. Janssen was found 70% responsible for Liu’s death and
ordered to pay $5.6 million to the family.
When Liu was first recommended for the Risperdal trial a pre-screening exam yielded abnormal electrocardiogram (EKG) readings and irregular blood tests, which indicated possible heart disease, according to a Fox 11 report.
When Liu was first recommended for the Risperdal trial a pre-screening exam yielded abnormal electrocardiogram (EKG) readings and irregular blood tests, which indicated possible heart disease, according to a Fox 11 report.
Despite these results, Liu was cleared for the
study and he began the Risperdal trial in February of 2009. Just days
after starting the study his condition worsened. He died 5 days after his
first Risperdal injection.
According to Law360, Doctors testified at the trial that Liu would
have had a 50% better chance of surviving if the researchers would have
transferred him to an acute-care facility when they first realized that his
condition was worsening.
The family alleges that Liu’s psychiatrist
convinced him to sign a consent form and enter the study and later received a
“finder's fee” of $30 thousand dollars from the drug company for his
enrollment. The psychiatrist was found 30% responsible and ordered to pay the
remainder of the settlement.
--Justin
Karter, News Editor
This entry was posted
in Adult, Adverse Effects, Antipsychotics, Bias, Corruption & Accountability, Coercion,Disorders, Drug Page, Featured News, Hearing Voices, In the News, In the News, Informed Consent,Involuntary Treatment, Metabolic Syndrome, Obesity/Metabolic Syndrome, Psychiatric Drugs, Research,Schizophrenia and Psychosis, Schizophrenia and Psychosis and tagged bioethics, clinical trials, ethics of clinical trials, finders
fee, Janssen pharmaceuticals, johnson & johnson, lawsuits, risperdal, risperidol,risperidone.
Bookmark the permalink.
RELATED
POSTS
New York Times Issues Correction on RAISE Study ReportOctober 26, 2015
Confusion Over Antipsychotic Dosing Data in RAISE StudyOctober 21, 2015
Landmark Schizophrenia Study Recommends More TherapyOctober 20, 2015
Meta-Analysis Ties Gray Matter Loss to Antipsychotic DoseSeptember 9, 2015
Antipsychotics Prescribed Off-Label for Challenging BehaviorsSeptember 8, 2015
Thank You Mr Karter and MIA.
Now, how long you think it will take J&J's Lawyers to shop the
Judge whose right for them and get it reversed?
UPDATES:
March 20, 2014
Arkansas Supreme Court Reverses Billion Dollar Risperdal Case
June 1st, 2015
Janssen To Pay $7.5 Million In Risperdal Settlement
March 20, 2014
Arkansas Supreme Court Reverses Billion Dollar Risperdal Case
June 1st, 2015
Janssen To Pay $7.5 Million In Risperdal Settlement
No comments:
Post a Comment
All standard cautions apply. Your milage may vary.
So Try to be an Adult, [no carpet F bombings, Pron, open threats, etc.] and not a Psychiatrist, about it. Google account, for now, is no longer required to comment, but moderation is in effect.